Andrea B Bontrager Yoder1, Janice L Liebhart2, Daniel J McCarty3, Amy Meinen4, Dale Schoeller5, Camilla Vargas6, Tara LaRowe7. 1. Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. Electronic address: ayoder@wisc.edu. 2. Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity Prevention Program, Madison, WI. 3. School of Health Care Professions, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Stevens Point, WI. 4. Wisconsin Obesity Prevention Network, School of Medicine and Public Health, Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. 5. Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. 6. Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection, Madison, WI. 7. Department of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of Wisconsin Farm to School (F2S) programs in increasing students' fruit and vegetable (FV) intake. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental baseline and follow-up assessments: knowledge and attitudes survey, food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), and lunch tray photo observation. SETTING: Wisconsin elementary schools: 1 urban and 8 rural. PARTICIPANTS: Children, grades 3-5 (n = 1,117; 53% male, 19% non-Caucasian). INTERVENTION(S): Farm to School programming ranging from Harvest of the Month alone to comprehensive, including school garden, locally sourced produce in school meals, and classroom lessons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knowledge, attitudes, exposure, liking, willingness; FFQ-derived (total), and photo-derived school lunch FV intake. ANALYSIS: t tests and mixed modeling to assess baseline differences and academic-year change. RESULTS: Higher willingness to try FV (+1%; P < .001) and knowledge of nutrition/agriculture (+1%; P < .001) (n = 888), and lunch FV availability (+6% to 17%; P ≤ .001) (n = 4,451 trays), both with increasing prior F2S program exposure and across the year. There was no effect on overall dietary patterns (FFQ; n = 305) but FV consumption increased among those with the lowest intakes (FFQ, baseline very low fruit intake, +135%, P < .001; photos: percentage of trays with no FV consumption for continuing programs decreased 3% to 10%, P ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Farm to School programming improved mediators of FV consumption and decreased the proportion of children with unfavorable FV behaviors at school lunch. Longer-term data are needed to further assess F2S programs.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of Wisconsin Farm to School (F2S) programs in increasing students' fruit and vegetable (FV) intake. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental baseline and follow-up assessments: knowledge and attitudes survey, food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), and lunch tray photo observation. SETTING: Wisconsin elementary schools: 1 urban and 8 rural. PARTICIPANTS: Children, grades 3-5 (n = 1,117; 53% male, 19% non-Caucasian). INTERVENTION(S): Farm to School programming ranging from Harvest of the Month alone to comprehensive, including school garden, locally sourced produce in school meals, and classroom lessons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knowledge, attitudes, exposure, liking, willingness; FFQ-derived (total), and photo-derived school lunch FV intake. ANALYSIS: t tests and mixed modeling to assess baseline differences and academic-year change. RESULTS: Higher willingness to try FV (+1%; P < .001) and knowledge of nutrition/agriculture (+1%; P < .001) (n = 888), and lunch FV availability (+6% to 17%; P ≤ .001) (n = 4,451 trays), both with increasing prior F2S program exposure and across the year. There was no effect on overall dietary patterns (FFQ; n = 305) but FV consumption increased among those with the lowest intakes (FFQ, baseline very low fruit intake, +135%, P < .001; photos: percentage of trays with no FV consumption for continuing programs decreased 3% to 10%, P ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Farm to School programming improved mediators of FV consumption and decreased the proportion of children with unfavorable FV behaviors at school lunch. Longer-term data are needed to further assess F2S programs.
Authors: Melissa Pflugh Prescott; Rebecca Cleary; Alessandro Bonanno; Marco Costanigro; Becca B R Jablonski; Abigail B Long Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Eunlye Lee; Carol Smathers; Ana C Zubieta; Sarah Ginnetti; Anjli Shah; Darcy A Freedman Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 2.118
Authors: Diana Gabriela Figueroa-Piña; Jorge Luis Chávez-Servín; Karina de la Torre-Carbot; María Del Carmen Caamaño-Pérez; Gabriela Lucas-Deecke; Patricia Roitman-Genoud; Laura Regina Ojeda-Navarro Journal: Nutr Res Pract Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 1.926