Literature DB >> 24952835

Normative scores on the Berg Balance Scale decline after age 70 years in healthy community-dwelling people: a systematic review.

Stephen Downs1, Jodie Marquez2, Pauline Chiarelli2.   

Abstract

QUESTIONS: What is the mean Berg Balance Scale score of healthy elderly people living in the community and how does it vary with age? How much variability in Berg Balance Scale scores is present in groups of healthy elderly people and how does this vary with age?
DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Any group of healthy community-dwelling people with a mean age of 70 years or greater that has undergone assessment using the Berg Balance Scale. OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Mean and standard deviations of Berg Balance Scale scores within cohorts of elderly people of known mean age.
RESULTS: The search yielded 17 relevant studies contributing data from a total of 1363 participants. The mean Berg Balance Scale scores ranged from 37 to 55 out of a possible maximum score of 56. The standard deviation of Berg Balance Scale scores varied from 1.0 to 9.2. Although participants aged around 70 years had very close to normal Berg Balance Scale scores, there was a significant decline in balance with age at a rate of 0.7 points on the 56-point Berg Balance Scale per year. There was also a strong association between increasing age and increasing variability in balance (R(2) = 0.56, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Healthy community-dwelling elderly people have modest balance deficits, as measured by the Berg Balance Scale, although balance scores deteriorate and become more variable with age.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aged; Berg Balance Scale; Literature review; Meta-analysis; Normal values

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24952835     DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2014.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiother        ISSN: 1836-9561            Impact factor:   7.000


  11 in total

1.  Detecting subtle mobility changes among older adults: the Quantitative Timed Up and Go test.

Authors:  Erin Smith; Caitriona Cunningham; Barry R Greene; Ulrik McCarthy Persson; Catherine Blake
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  A Retrospective Analysis of Post-Stroke Berg Balance Scale Scores: How Should Normal and At-Risk Scores Be Interpreted?

Authors:  Kara K Patterson; Elizabeth Inness; William E McIlroy; Avril Mansfield
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Low normal FMR1 genotype in older adult women: Psychological well-being and motor function.

Authors:  Jessica Klusek; Roger Newman-Norlund; Amanda J Fairchild; Sarah Newman-Norlund; Sara Sayers; Jill C Stewart; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.163

4.  Metric properties of the "timed get up and go- modified version" test, in risk assessment of falls in active women.

Authors:  Margareth Lorena Alfonso Mora
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2017-03-30

5.  Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly.

Authors:  Jingjuan Ju; Yu Jiang; Peng Zhou; Lin Li; Xiaolei Ye; Hongmei Wu; Bin Shen; Jialei Zhang; Xiaoding He; Chunjin Niu; Qinghua Xia
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Educational and Exercise Intervention to Prevent Falls and Improve Participation in Subjects With Neurological Conditions: The NEUROFALL Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Davide Cattaneo; Elisa Gervasoni; Elisabetta Pupillo; Elisa Bianchi; Irene Aprile; Isabella Imbimbo; Rita Russo; Arianna Cruciani; Andrea Turolla; Johanna Jonsdottir; Michela Agostini; Ettore Beghi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  K-D Balance: An objective measure of balance in tandem and double leg stances.

Authors:  Chelsea Zhang; Alexandra Talaber; Melanie Truong; Bert B Vargas
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2019-11-04

8.  Group-Based and Individually Delivered LiFE: Content Evaluation and Predictors of Training Response - A Dose-Response Analysis.

Authors:  Corinna Nerz; Franziska Kramer-Gmeiner; Carl-Philipp Jansen; Sarah Labudek; Jochen Klenk; Clemens Becker; Michael Schwenk
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.829

9.  Age-dependent changes in dynamic standing-balance ability evaluated quantitatively using a stabilometer.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Suzuki; Shigeru Yatoh; Hiroaki Suzuki; Yuuki Tanabe; Yukiyo Shimizu; Yasushi Hada; Hitoshi Shimano
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-01-27

10.  Perceived and Functional Balance Control Is Negatively Affected by Diminished Touch and Vibration Sensitivity in Relatively Healthy Older Adults and Elderly.

Authors:  Anna Hafström
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Med       Date:  2018-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.