Tariq Ahmad1, Mona Fiuzat1, Benjamin Neely2, Megan L Neely2, Michael J Pencina2, William E Kraus3, Faiez Zannad4, David J Whellan5, Mark P Donahue3, Ileana L Piña6, Kirkwood F Adams7, Dalane W Kitzman8, Christopher M O'Connor1, G Michael Felker9. 1. Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina. 3. Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 4. Nancy University, Nancy, France. 5. Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 6. Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York. 7. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 8. Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 9. Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: michael.felker@duke.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether biomarkers of myocardial stress and fibrosis improve prediction of the mode of death in patients with chronic heart failure. BACKGROUND: The 2 most common modes of death in patients with chronic heart failure are pump failure and sudden cardiac death. Prediction of the mode of death may facilitate treatment decisions. The relationship between amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), galectin-3, and ST2, biomarkers that reflect different pathogenic pathways in heart failure (myocardial stress and fibrosis), and mode of death is unknown. METHODS: HF-ACTION (Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training) was a randomized controlled trial of exercise training versus usual care in patients with chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%). An independent clinical events committee prospectively adjudicated mode of death. NT-proBNP, galectin-3, and ST2 levels were assessed at baseline in 813 subjects. Associations between biomarkers and mode of death were assessed using cause-specific Cox proportional hazards modeling, and interaction testing was used to measure differential associations between biomarkers and pump failure versus sudden cardiac death. Discrimination and risk reclassification metrics were used to assess the added value of galectin-3 and ST2 in predicting mode of death risk beyond a clinical model that included NT-proBNP. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 2.5 years, there were 155 deaths: 49 from pump failure, 42 from sudden cardiac death, and 64 from other causes. Elevations in all biomarkers were associated with increased risk for both pump failure and sudden cardiac death in both adjusted and unadjusted analyses. In each case, increases in the biomarker had a stronger association with pump failure than sudden cardiac death, but this relationship was attenuated after adjustment for clinical risk factors. Clinical variables along with NT-proBNP levels were stronger predictors of pump failure (C statistic: 0.87) than sudden cardiac death (C statistic: 0.73). Addition of ST2 and galectin-3 led to improved net risk classification of 11% for sudden cardiac death, but not pump failure. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical predictors along with NT-proBNP levels were strong predictors of pump failure risk, with insignificant incremental contributions of ST2 and galectin-3. Predictability of sudden cardiac death risk was less robust and enhanced by information provided by novel biomarkers.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether biomarkers of myocardial stress and fibrosis improve prediction of the mode of death in patients with chronic heart failure. BACKGROUND: The 2 most common modes of death in patients with chronic heart failure are pump failure and sudden cardiac death. Prediction of the mode of death may facilitate treatment decisions. The relationship between amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), galectin-3, and ST2, biomarkers that reflect different pathogenic pathways in heart failure (myocardial stress and fibrosis), and mode of death is unknown. METHODS: HF-ACTION (Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training) was a randomized controlled trial of exercise training versus usual care in patients with chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%). An independent clinical events committee prospectively adjudicated mode of death. NT-proBNP, galectin-3, and ST2 levels were assessed at baseline in 813 subjects. Associations between biomarkers and mode of death were assessed using cause-specific Cox proportional hazards modeling, and interaction testing was used to measure differential associations between biomarkers and pump failure versus sudden cardiac death. Discrimination and risk reclassification metrics were used to assess the added value of galectin-3 and ST2 in predicting mode of death risk beyond a clinical model that included NT-proBNP. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 2.5 years, there were 155 deaths: 49 from pump failure, 42 from sudden cardiac death, and 64 from other causes. Elevations in all biomarkers were associated with increased risk for both pump failure and sudden cardiac death in both adjusted and unadjusted analyses. In each case, increases in the biomarker had a stronger association with pump failure than sudden cardiac death, but this relationship was attenuated after adjustment for clinical risk factors. Clinical variables along with NT-proBNP levels were stronger predictors of pump failure (C statistic: 0.87) than sudden cardiac death (C statistic: 0.73). Addition of ST2 and galectin-3 led to improved net risk classification of 11% for sudden cardiac death, but not pump failure. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical predictors along with NT-proBNP levels were strong predictors of pump failure risk, with insignificant incremental contributions of ST2 and galectin-3. Predictability of sudden cardiac death risk was less robust and enhanced by information provided by novel biomarkers.
Authors: Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Mark H Drazner; Gregg C Fonarow; Stephen A Geraci; Tamara Horwich; James L Januzzi; Maryl R Johnson; Edward K Kasper; Wayne C Levy; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; John J V McMurray; Judith E Mitchell; Pamela N Peterson; Barbara Riegel; Flora Sam; Lynne W Stevenson; W H Wilson Tang; Emily J Tsai; Bruce L Wilkoff Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: John J V McMurray; Stamatis Adamopoulos; Stefan D Anker; Angelo Auricchio; Michael Böhm; Kenneth Dickstein; Volkmar Falk; Gerasimos Filippatos; Cândida Fonseca; Miguel Angel Gomez-Sanchez; Tiny Jaarsma; Lars Køber; Gregory Y H Lip; Aldo Pietro Maggioni; Alexander Parkhomenko; Burkert M Pieske; Bogdan A Popescu; Per K Rønnevik; Frans H Rutten; Juerg Schwitter; Petar Seferovic; Janina Stepinska; Pedro T Trindade; Adriaan A Voors; Faiez Zannad; Andreas Zeiher Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-05-19 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: David J Whellan; Christopher M O'Connor; Kerry L Lee; Steven J Keteyian; Lawton S Cooper; Stephen J Ellis; Eric S Leifer; William E Kraus; Dalane W Kitzman; James A Blumenthal; David S Rendall; Nancy Houston-Miller; Jerome L Fleg; Kevin A Schulman; Ileana L Piña Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Donald Lloyd-Jones; Robert Adams; Mercedes Carnethon; Giovanni De Simone; T Bruce Ferguson; Katherine Flegal; Earl Ford; Karen Furie; Alan Go; Kurt Greenlund; Nancy Haase; Susan Hailpern; Michael Ho; Virginia Howard; Brett Kissela; Steven Kittner; Daniel Lackland; Lynda Lisabeth; Ariane Marelli; Mary McDermott; James Meigs; Dariush Mozaffarian; Graham Nichol; Christopher O'Donnell; Veronique Roger; Wayne Rosamond; Ralph Sacco; Paul Sorlie; Randall Stafford; Julia Steinberger; Thomas Thom; Sylvia Wasserthiel-Smoller; Nathan Wong; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Yuling Hong Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Domingo A Pascual-Figal; Jordi Ordoñez-Llanos; Pedro L Tornel; Rafael Vázquez; Teresa Puig; Mariano Valdés; Juan Cinca; Antoni Bayes de Luna; Antoni Bayes-Genis Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Christopher M O'Connor; David J Whellan; Kerry L Lee; Steven J Keteyian; Lawton S Cooper; Stephen J Ellis; Eric S Leifer; William E Kraus; Dalane W Kitzman; James A Blumenthal; David S Rendall; Nancy Houston Miller; Jerome L Fleg; Kevin A Schulman; Robert S McKelvie; Faiez Zannad; Ileana L Piña Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-04-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jari M Tapanainen; Kai S Lindgren; Timo H Mäkikallio; Olli Vuolteenaho; Juhani Leppäluoto; Heikki V Huikuri Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-03-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Robert R Jenq; Ying Taur; Sean M Devlin; Doris M Ponce; Jenna D Goldberg; Katya F Ahr; Eric R Littmann; Lilan Ling; Asia C Gobourne; Liza C Miller; Melissa D Docampo; Jonathan U Peled; Nicholas Arpaia; Justin R Cross; Tatanisha K Peets; Melissa A Lumish; Yusuke Shono; Jarrod A Dudakov; Hendrik Poeck; Alan M Hanash; Juliet N Barker; Miguel-Angel Perales; Sergio A Giralt; Eric G Pamer; Marcel R M van den Brink Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Hicham Skali; Robert Gerwien; Timothy E Meyer; James V Snider; Scott D Solomon; Craig M Stolen Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Marat Fudim; Jacob P Kelly; Aaron D Jones; Omar F AbouEzzeddine; Andrew P Ambrosy; Stephen J Greene; Yogesh N V Reddy; Kevin J Anstrom; Brooke Alhanti; Gregory D Lewis; Adrian F Hernandez; G Michael Felker Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2019-11-16 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Benjamin French; Le Wang; Bonnie Ky; Jeffrey Brandimarto; Anupam Basuray; James C Fang; Nancy K Sweitzer; Thomas P Cappola Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 5.712