Literature DB >> 24951739

The Influence of Local Bone Density on the Outcome of One Hundred and Fifty Proximal Humeral Fractures Treated with a Locking Plate.

Franz Kralinger1, Michael Blauth1, Jörg Goldhahn2, Kurt Käch3, Christine Voigt4, Andreas Platz5, Beate Hanson6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is biomechanical evidence that bone density predicts the mechanical failure of implants. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the influence of local bone mineral density on the rate of mechanical failure after locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures.
METHODS: We enrolled 150 patients who were from fifty to ninety years old with a closed, displaced proximal humeral fracture fixed with use of a locking plate from July 2007 to April 2010. There were 118 women and thirty-two men who had a mean age of sixty-nine years. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were done to assess bone mineral density of the contralateral humerus, and dual x-ray absorptiometry of the distal end of the radius of the unaffected arm was conducted within the first six weeks postoperatively. At follow-up evaluations at six weeks, three months, and one year postoperatively, pain, shoulder mobility, strength, and multiple functional and quality-of-life outcome measures (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] questionnaire; Shoulder Pain and Disability Index [SPADI]; Constant score; and EuroQuol-5D [EQ-5D]) were done and standard radiographs were made. We defined mechanical failure as all complications related to bone quality experienced within one year.
RESULTS: After locking plate fixation, fifty-three (35%) of 150 patients had mechanical failure; loss of reduction and secondary screw loosening with perforation were common. CT assessments of local bone mineral density showed no difference between patients with and without mechanical failure (89.82 versus 91.51 mg/cm3, respectively; p = 0.670). One-year DASH, SPADI, and Constant scores were significantly better for patients without mechanical failure (p ≤ 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: We did not find evidence of an association between bone mineral density and the rate of mechanical failures, which may suggest that patients with normal bone mineral density are less prone to sustain a proximal humeral fracture. Future studies should target other discriminating factors between patients with and without mechanical failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24951739     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  15 in total

1.  Deltoid Tuberosity Index: A Simple Radiographic Tool to Assess Local Bone Quality in Proximal Humerus Fractures.

Authors:  Christian Spross; Nicola Kaestle; Emanuel Benninger; Jürgen Fornaro; Johannes Erhardt; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Bernhard Jost
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Clinical Management of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Adam Z Khan; Richard D Rames; Anna N Miller
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Mid-term results of a less-invasive locking plate fixation method for proximal humeral fractures: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Benjamin Bockmann; Benjamin Buecking; Daniel Franz; Ralph Zettl; Steffen Ruchholtz; Juliane Mohr
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 4.  The Applications of Finite Element Analysis in Proximal Humeral Fractures.

Authors:  Yongyu Ye; Wei You; Weimin Zhu; Jiaming Cui; Kang Chen; Daping Wang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-09-10       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 5.  Complications Associated with Locking Plate of Proximal Humerus Fractures.

Authors:  Venkat Kavuri; Blake Bowden; Neil Kumar; Doug Cerynik
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Fractures of the Proximal Part of the Humerus.

Authors:  C Spross; P Grueninger; S Gohil; M Dietrich
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2015-08-12

7.  Failure after proximal humeral fracture osteosynthesis: a one year analysis of hospital-related healthcare cost.

Authors:  Jan Dauwe; Gregory Walters; Lukas A Holzer; Kris Vanhaecht; Stefaan Nijs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Bench-to-bedside strategies for osteoporotic fracture: From osteoimmunology to mechanosensation.

Authors:  Yong Xie; Licheng Zhang; Qi Xiong; Yanpan Gao; Wei Ge; Peifu Tang
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 13.567

Review 9.  Finite Element Analysis of Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Dominic Mischler; Hwabok Wee; J Spence Reid; Peter Varga
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.163

10.  Histomorphometric Assessment of Cancellous and Cortical Bone Material Distribution in the Proximal Humerus of Normal and Osteoporotic Individuals: Significantly Reduced Bone Stock in the Metaphyseal and Subcapital Regions of Osteoporotic Individuals.

Authors:  Christoph M Sprecher; Florian Schmidutz; Tobias Helfen; R Geoff Richards; Michael Blauth; Stefan Milz
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.