| Literature DB >> 24951537 |
C Krump1, M Vogl2, L Brecker2, B Nidetzky3, R Kratzer3.
Abstract
Aldo-keto reductases tighten coenzyme binding by forming a hydrogen bond across the pyrophosphate group of NAD(P)(H). Mutation of the hydrogen bonding anchor Lys24 in Candida tenuis xylose reductase prevents fastening of the "safety belt" around NAD(H). The loosened NAD(H) binding leads to increased turnover numbers (k(cat)) for reductions of bulky-bulky ketones at constant substrate and coenzyme affinities (i.e. K(m Ketone), K(m NADH)).Entities:
Keywords: Aldo-keto reductase; chiral ethyl mandelates; enzyme engineering; saturation transfer difference NMR
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24951537 PMCID: PMC4064709 DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzu021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Protein Eng Des Sel ISSN: 1741-0126 Impact factor: 1.650
Fig. 1.The overall fold of AKRs is shown using the example of CtXR. The co-crystallized NAD+ is shown in green (PDB 1MI3). The three large loops are indicated by arrows (A). Structure rotated by 45 degrees around the x-axis (B). Close-up look of the “safety belt” formed by a hydrogen bond (dashed blue line) between Nξ of K24 to S223 (turquoise) (C). Visualized with PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, 0.99rc6, Schrödinger, LLC.
Apparent kinetic parameters of wild type and mutant for NADH-dependent reduction of a series of carbonyl substrates
| Substrate (maximal concentration in mM) | Kinetic parametersa,b,c | Wild type | Mutant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xylose (700) | 91d | 540 ± 110 | |
| 12d | 0.08 ± 0.01 | ||
| 132d | 0.23 ± 0.02 | ||
| 39d | 201 ± 35 | ||
| 308 000d | 550 ± 30 | ||
| 2′-Chloroacetophenone (10) | 13 ± 4 | 5 ± 2 | |
| 0.8 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | ||
| 290 ± 30 | 370 ± 50 | ||
| 110 ± 25 | 70 ± 20 | ||
| 8700 ± 400 | 7600 ± 500 | ||
| 2′,4′-Dichloroacetophenone (5) | 6 ± 2 | 4 ± 1 | |
| 2.7 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | ||
| 840 ± 70 | 1010 ± 260 | ||
| 170 ± 50 | 80 ± 25 | ||
| 14 300 ± 1300 | 8500 ± 900 | ||
| Ethyl 4-cyanobenzoylformate (10) | 5 ± 2 | 4 ± 1 | |
| 0.4 ± 0.06 | 17 ± 2 | ||
| 100 ± 10 | 6400 ± 900 | ||
| 140 ± 25 | 150 ± 50 | ||
| 2800 ± 100 | 77 000 ± 4000 | ||
| Ethyl benzoylformate (10) | 89 ± 5 | 6300 ± 800 | |
| Ethyl 2-chlorobenzoylformate (1.5) | 350 ± 20 | 29 000 ± 4000 | |
| Ethyl 3-chlorobenzoylformate (1.5) | 52 ± 4 | 3000 ± 80 | |
| Ethyl 4-chlorobenzoylformate (1.5) | 1200 ± 100 | 56 000 ± 5000 |
aUncertainties in Km values are due to incomplete substrate saturation, i.e. low substrate solubilities or high absorption of NADH (>300 µM). Km A is the Km value of the carbonyl substrate.
bkcat app were determined from initial rates at maximal substrate concentrations and 300 µM NADH.
cCatalytic efficiencies (kcat/Km) were calculated from the slope of the Michaelis–Menten plot where the rate is linearly dependent on the (co)substrate concentration and equals kcat[E]/Km.
dData are taken from Kratzer . All data show mean values from three independent measurements.
Fig. 2.CtXR-NADH interactions visualized by STD 1H-NMR. Wild type CtXR•NADH binary complex (A) compared to wild type ternary complexes with xylose (B), 2′-chloroacetophenone (C), 2′,4′-dichloroacetophenone (D) and mutant ternary complexes with xylose (E) and 2′,4′-dichloroacetophenone (F). (STD effects are shown by shades of gray; tight binding effect of the respective proton is indicated by light gray (scored 100), no binding effect is indicated by dark gray (scored 0). Signals of nicotinamide protons 4-pro-R and 4-pro-S are summarized to signal 2. Due to uncertainties in precise proton assignment, effects are allocated to molecule domains. Data is shown in the Supplementary material).