Literature DB >> 24951269

Differential impact of body mass index on absolute and percent breast density: implications regarding their use as breast cancer risk biomarkers.

Susann E Schetter1, Terryl J Hartman, Jason Liao, John P Richie, Bogdan Prokopczyk, Cindy DuBrock, Carina Signori, Christopher Hamilton, Laurence M Demers, Karam El-Bayoumy, Andrea Manni.   

Abstract

Percent breast density (PBD), a commonly used biomarker of breast cancer risk (BCR), is confounded by the influence of non-dense breast tissue on its measurement and factors, such as BMI, which have an impact on non-dense tissue. Consequently, BMI, a potent BCR factor, is, paradoxically, negatively correlated with PBD. We propose that absolute breast density (ABD) is a more accurate biomarker of BCR. We used a volumetric method to compare the correlation between PBD and ABD with baseline demographics and dietary and physical activity variables in a group of 169 postmenopausal women enrolled in a clinical trial prior to any intervention. As expected, a strong negative correlation between PBD and BMI was observed (Rho = -0.5, p < 5e(-12)). In contrast, we observed a strong, previously not well established, positive correlation of BMI with ABD (Rho = 0.41, p < 2.5e(-8)), which supports the use of ABD as a more accurate indicator of BCR. Correction of PBD by BMI did not frequently provide the same information as ABD. In addition, because of the strong influence of BMI on ABD, many correlations between dietary variables and ABD did not emerge, until adjustment was made for BMI. ABD corrected by BMI should be the gold standard BD measurement. These findings identify the optimal measurement of BD when testing the influence of an intervention on BD as a biomarker of BCR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24951269     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3031-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  16 in total

1.  Stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1, a novel target of omega-3 fatty acids for reducing breast cancer risk in obese postmenopausal women.

Authors:  A Manni; J P Richie; S E Schetter; A Calcagnotto; N Trushin; C Aliaga; K El-Bayoumy
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Assessment of mammographic breast density after sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Rafael Alvarez; Elika Ridelman; Natalie Rizk; Morgan S White; Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan; Oliver A Varban; Mark A Helvie; Randy J Seeley
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.734

3.  Using ultrasound tomography to identify the distributions of density throughout the breast.

Authors:  Mark Sak; Neb Duric; Peter Littrup; Mark E Sherman; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-04

Review 4.  Reproductive Factors and Mammographic Density: Associations Among 24,840 Women and Comparison of Studies Using Digitized Film-Screen Mammography and Full-Field Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Stacey E Alexeeff; Nnaemeka U Odo; Russell McBride; Valerie McGuire; Ninah Achacoso; Joseph H Rothstein; Jafi A Lipson; Rhea Y Liang; Luana Acton; Martin J Yaffe; Alice S Whittemore; Daniel L Rubin; Weiva Sieh; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Using Speed of Sound Imaging to Characterize Breast Density.

Authors:  Mark Sak; Neb Duric; Peter Littrup; Lisa Bey-Knight; Haythem Ali; Patricia Vallieres; Mark E Sherman; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  The effect of weight change on changes in breast density measures over menopause in a breast cancer screening cohort.

Authors:  Johanna Olga Pauline Wanders; Marije Fokje Bakker; Wouter Bernard Veldhuis; Petra Huberdina Maria Peeters; Carla Henrica van Gils
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Geographic variation in volumetric breast density between screening regions in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Daniëlle van der Waal; Marleen J Emaus; Marije F Bakker; Gerard J den Heeten; Nico Karssemeijer; Ruud M Pijnappel; Wouter B Veldhuis; André L M Verbeek; Carla H van Gils; Mireille J M Broeders
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Effects of statin use on volumetric mammographic density: results from the KARMA study.

Authors:  Ida Skarping; Judith S Brand; Per Hall; Signe Borgquist
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Cyclic endogenous estrogen and progesterone vary by mammographic density phenotypes in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Anita Iversen; Hanne Frydenberg; Anne-Sofie Furberg; Vidar G Flote; Sissi Espetvedt Finstad; Anne McTiernan; Giske Ursin; Tom Wilsgaard; Peter T Ellison; Grazyna Jasienska; Inger Thune
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Comparing Visually Assessed BI-RADS Breast Density and Automated Volumetric Breast Density Software: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Breast Cancer Screening Setting.

Authors:  Daniëlle van der Waal; Gerard J den Heeten; Ruud M Pijnappel; Klaas H Schuur; Johanna M H Timmers; André L M Verbeek; Mireille J M Broeders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.