OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of increasing the spatial resolution of the prostate DWI protocol on image quality and lesion conspicuity. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer undergoing MRI examinations were imaged with two diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) protocols: current standard clinical protocol (6.7 mm(3) voxels) and a new high-resolution protocol (3.1 mm(3) voxels). Diffusion-weighted images were independently and subjectively scored on lesion conspicuity, internal architecture definition, and overall image quality by two radiologists. Average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured in normal tissue and cancerous lesions on both sequences. Reader scores and ADC and contrast values were compared between the two protocols. Cancer ADC values were correlated with Gleason scores. RESULTS: The signal-to-noise ratio of the new high-resolution DWI protocol was 40% lower than that of the standard protocol. The reader scores were higher by 0.73 (range, 0.29-1.16) grades, or 19% (range, 7-32%), on average, for the new protocol, indicating better image quality. The average ADC values were 8% higher with the new protocol, with ADC contrast values between cancer and normal prostate unchanged. There was marginally significant correlation of cancer ADC values with Gleason scores (p = 0.05, r ≈ -0.36). CONCLUSION: We showed that for DWI of the prostate at 3-7 mm(3) voxel sizes the benefits of higher spatial resolution outweigh the effects of reduced signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios, potentially improving the sensitivity to small or sparse prostate cancers. Radiologists can consider using higher-spatial-resolution DWI sequences in their practices.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of increasing the spatial resolution of the prostate DWI protocol on image quality and lesion conspicuity. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer undergoing MRI examinations were imaged with two diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) protocols: current standard clinical protocol (6.7 mm(3) voxels) and a new high-resolution protocol (3.1 mm(3) voxels). Diffusion-weighted images were independently and subjectively scored on lesion conspicuity, internal architecture definition, and overall image quality by two radiologists. Average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured in normal tissue and cancerous lesions on both sequences. Reader scores and ADC and contrast values were compared between the two protocols. Cancer ADC values were correlated with Gleason scores. RESULTS: The signal-to-noise ratio of the new high-resolution DWI protocol was 40% lower than that of the standard protocol. The reader scores were higher by 0.73 (range, 0.29-1.16) grades, or 19% (range, 7-32%), on average, for the new protocol, indicating better image quality. The average ADC values were 8% higher with the new protocol, with ADC contrast values between cancer and normal prostate unchanged. There was marginally significant correlation of cancer ADC values with Gleason scores (p = 0.05, r ≈ -0.36). CONCLUSION: We showed that for DWI of the prostate at 3-7 mm(3) voxel sizes the benefits of higher spatial resolution outweigh the effects of reduced signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios, potentially improving the sensitivity to small or sparse prostate cancers. Radiologists can consider using higher-spatial-resolution DWI sequences in their practices.
Entities:
Keywords:
MRI; high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI); prostate cancer
Authors: Ali-Reza Sharif-Afshar; Christopher Nguyen; Tom S Feng; Lucas Payor; Zhaoyang Fan; Rola Saouaf; Debiao Li; Hyung L Kim Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 8.143