Literature DB >> 24950284

Complex Liver Resection Using Standard Total Vascular Exclusion, Venovenous Bypass, and In Situ Hypothermic Portal Perfusion: An Audit of 77 Consecutive Cases.

Daniel Azoulay1, Chetana Lim, Chady Salloum, Paola Andreani, Umberto Maggi, Tonine Bartelmaos, Denis Castaing, Gérard Pascal, Feetal Fesuy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify independent predictors of 90-day mortality after liver resection for patients undergoing standard total vascular exclusion (TVE) with hypothermic portal perfusion and venovenous bypass. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the long-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Tumors invading the vena cava and/or the hepatocaval confluence are indications for standard TVE. The inclusion of liver hypothermic perfusion permits safe TVE. There are a limited number of reports focusing on this complex technique and no relevant analysis of short-term and long-term results.
METHODS: Seventy-seven consecutive liver resections performed using standard TVE with hypothermic portal perfusion and venovenous bypass between 1998 and 2010 were analyzed. The independent predictors and rates of 90-day mortality, morbidity, and long-term survival were evaluated.
RESULTS: The 90-day mortality rate was 19.5% (15 cases). Three independent predictors of mortality were identified: age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index 3 or more (P = 0.0231; odds ratio = 47.565; 95% confidence interval = 1.701-1330.414), tumor size 10 cm or more (P = 0.0442; odds ratio = 6.374; 95% confidence interval = 1.049-38.734), and the presence of 50/50 criteria (P = 0.0407; odds ratio = 6.217; 95% confidence interval = 1.080-35.782). The overall 5-year survival rate was 30.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection using standard TVE with hypothermic portal perfusion and venovenous bypass is associated with a high mortality rate. The identification of preoperative predictors of mortality should improve the selection of patients for this aggressive surgery. Compared with nonsurgical management, the long-term results are acceptable and justify this aggressive surgery in selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24950284     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  18 in total

1.  Single-Centre Experience of Supra-Renal Vena Cava Resection and Reconstruction.

Authors:  Nikola Vladov; Radoslav Kostadinov; Vassil Mihaylov; Ivelin Takorov; Tsonka Lukanova; Maria Yakova; Tsvetan Trichkov; Evelina Odisseeva; Ventsislav Mutafchiyski
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Critical appraisal of the modified ante situm liver resection : Is the original method the better choice?

Authors:  Mohammad H Fard-Aghaie; Alexandros Kantas; Georgios Makridis; Tim Reese; Kim C Wagner; Karl J Oldhafer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Response to "Critical appraisal of the modified ante situm liver resection-is the original method the better choice?"

Authors:  F Oldhafer; K I Ringe; K Timrott; M Kleine; O Beetz; W Ramackers; S Cammann; J Klempnauer; H Bektas; Florian W R Vondran
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  The technical aspects of ex vivo hepatectomy with autotransplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Baimas-George; Kyle J Thompson; Michael D Watson; David A Iannitti; John B Martinie; Erin H Baker; David Levi; Dionisios Vrochides
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Central Hepatectomy versus Extended Hepatectomy for Malignant Tumors: A Propensity Score Analysis of Postoperative Complications.

Authors:  Nicola de'Angelis; Gérard Pascal; Chady Salloum; Eylon Lahat; Philippe Ichai; Faouzi Saliba; René Adam; Denis Castaing; Daniel Azoulay
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Acute kidney injury following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: incidence, risk factors and prognostic value.

Authors:  Chetana Lim; Etienne Audureau; Chady Salloum; Eric Levesque; Eylon Lahat; Jean Claude Merle; Philippe Compagnon; Gilles Dhonneur; Cyrille Feray; Daniel Azoulay
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Current trends in vena cava reconstructive techniques with major liver resection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Baimas-George; Christoph Tschuor; Michael Watson; Jesse Sulzer; Patrick Salibi; David Iannitti; John B Martinie; Erin Baker; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Dionisios Vrochides
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Extreme liver surgery as treatment of liver tumors involving the hepatocaval confluence.

Authors:  C Codony; S López-Ben; M Albiol; L Falgueras; E Castro; A Codina-Barreras; M Casellas; J Gil; A Codina-Cazador; J Figueras
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  In Situ Hypothermic Perfusion of the Liver for Complex Hepatic Resection: Surgical Refinements.

Authors:  François Cauchy; Raffaele Brustia; Fabiano Perdigao; Denis Bernard; Olivier Soubrane; Olivier Scatton
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Protective Mechanisms of Hypothermia in Liver Surgery and Transplantation.

Authors:  Pim B Olthof; Megan J Reiniers; Marcel C Dirkes; Thomas M van Gulik; Rowan F van Golen
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 6.354

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.