PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an update on the outcomes and complications of laparoscopic (or robot-assisted) sacrocervicopexy with and without supracervical hysterectomy, and highlight the differences with sacrocolpopexy technique based on the most recent evidence. RECENT FINDINGS: Laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocervicopexy with supracervical hysterectomy and sacrohysteropexy have good success rates, with a mean objective success rate of 96% (range 90-100%), subjective success rates of 80-95% and mean reoperation rate of 3%. Also, pelvic symptoms and quality of life improved after laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy. These results are similar to laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy, and are confirmed by the results of two comparative studies. Mesh erosion risk is very low in patients treated with laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy. Studies that compare laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concomitant total hysterectomy and sacrocervicopexy with subtotal hysterectomy show that total hysterectomy is associated with a greater prevalence of vaginal mesh exposure when compared with a subtotal hysterectomy. In case of sacralpexy, if it is decided to proceed with a hysterectomy, it is recommended to limit this to a subtotal. SUMMARY: The benefits of laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy with or without supracervical hysterectomy in terms of outcomes and reduced risk of mesh erosion in comparison with sacrocolpopexy and concomitant total hysterectomy have to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials. Moreover, standardization of surgical technique is mandatory.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an update on the outcomes and complications of laparoscopic (or robot-assisted) sacrocervicopexy with and without supracervical hysterectomy, and highlight the differences with sacrocolpopexy technique based on the most recent evidence. RECENT FINDINGS: Laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocervicopexy with supracervical hysterectomy and sacrohysteropexy have good success rates, with a mean objective success rate of 96% (range 90-100%), subjective success rates of 80-95% and mean reoperation rate of 3%. Also, pelvic symptoms and quality of life improved after laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy. These results are similar to laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy, and are confirmed by the results of two comparative studies. Mesh erosion risk is very low in patients treated with laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy. Studies that compare laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concomitant total hysterectomy and sacrocervicopexy with subtotal hysterectomy show that total hysterectomy is associated with a greater prevalence of vaginal mesh exposure when compared with a subtotal hysterectomy. In case of sacralpexy, if it is decided to proceed with a hysterectomy, it is recommended to limit this to a subtotal. SUMMARY: The benefits of laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy with or without supracervical hysterectomy in terms of outcomes and reduced risk of mesh erosion in comparison with sacrocolpopexy and concomitant total hysterectomy have to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials. Moreover, standardization of surgical technique is mandatory.
Authors: Alexandra Dubinskaya; Diego Hernandez-Aranda; Dorothy B Wakefield; Jonathan P Shepherd Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2019-06-29 Impact factor: 2.894