Literature DB >> 24949569

Effect of environmental cues on the behavioral efficacy of haloperidol, olanzapine, and clozapine in rats.

Tao Sun1, Xinfeng Liu, Ming Li.   

Abstract

Previous studies have reported that context can powerfully modulate the inhibitory effect of an antipsychotic drug on phencyclidine (PCP)-induced hyperlocomotion (a behavioral test used to evaluate putative antipsychotic drugs). The present study investigated the experimental conditions under which environmental stimuli exert their influence through associative conditioning processes. Experiment 1 examined the extent to which previous antipsychotic treatment in the home cages affected a drug's ability to inhibit PCP-induced hyperlocomotion in novel motor activity test apparatus. Five days of repeated haloperidol (0.05 mg/kg, subcutaneously) and olanzapine (2.0 mg/kg, subcutaneously) treatment in the home cages still potentiated their inhibition of PCP-induced hyperlocomotion (i.e. sensitization) assessed in a new environment, whereas the clozapine (10.0 mg/kg, subcutaneously) treatment enhanced the development of clozapine tolerance, indicating a lack of environmental modulation of antipsychotic efficacy. Experiment 2 assessed the impact of different numbers of antipsychotic administrations (e.g. 4, 2 or 0), in either the home environment or test environment, on a drug's ability to inhibit PCP-induced hyperlocomotion. Repeated administration of clozapine (5.0 mg/kg, subcutaneously) or olanzapine (1.0 mg/kg, subcutaneously) for 4 consecutive days, irrespective of where these treatments occurred, led to a similar level of inhibition of PCP-induced hyperlocomotion. However, 4-day haloperidol (0.03 mg/kg, subcutaneously) treatment in the test apparatus led to significantly higher inhibition than a 4-day home-cage treatment. Thus, more exposures to the test environment under the influence of haloperidol (but not clozapine or olanzapine) caused a stronger inhibition than fewer exposures, indicating a strong environmental modulation. Collectively, these findings suggest that previous antipsychotic treatment in one environment could alter later antipsychotic-like response assessed in a different environment under certain test conditions. Therefore, whether the circumstances surrounding antipsychotic drug administration have a powerful effect on the expression of antipsychotic-like efficacy is dependent on specific experimental and drug treatment factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24949569      PMCID: PMC4102894          DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Pharmacol        ISSN: 0955-8810            Impact factor:   2.293


  28 in total

1.  Antipsychotic agents differ in how fast they come off the dopamine D2 receptors. Implications for atypical antipsychotic action.

Authors:  S Kapur; P Seeman
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 2.  Pavlovian psychopharmacology: the associative basis of tolerance.

Authors:  S Siegel; M A Baptista; J A Kim; R V McDonald; L Weise-Kelly
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Evidence from rats that morphine tolerance is a learned response.

Authors:  S Siegel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1975-07

4.  Pavlovian conditioning analysis of morphine tolerance.

Authors:  S Siegel
Journal:  NIDA Res Monogr       Date:  1978

5.  Memory processes governing amphetamine-induced psychomotor sensitization.

Authors:  Stephan G Anagnostaras; Timothy Schallert; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Morphine tolerance acquisition as an associative process.

Authors:  S Siegel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1977-01

7.  The role of Pavlovian processes in drug tolerance and dependence: implications for treatment.

Authors:  C X Poulos; R E Hinson; S Siegel
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Catalepsy intensifies context-dependently irrespective of whether it is induced by intermittent or chronic dopamine deficiency.

Authors:  A Klein; W J Schmidt
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.293

9.  Context-dependent catalepsy intensification is due to classical conditioning and sensitization.

Authors:  J Amtage; W J Schmidt
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.293

10.  Pavlovian conditional tolerance to haloperidol catalepsy: evidence of dynamic adaptation in the dopaminergic system.

Authors:  C X Poulos; R Hinson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-10-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of D- and L-govadine on the disruption of touchscreen object-location paired associates learning in rats by acute MK-801 treatment.

Authors:  Brittney R Lins; Anthony G Phillips; John G Howland
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Antipsychotic-induced sensitization and tolerance: Behavioral characteristics, developmental impacts, and neurobiological mechanisms.

Authors:  Ming Li
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.153

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.