Literature DB >> 12007741

Memory processes governing amphetamine-induced psychomotor sensitization.

Stephan G Anagnostaras1, Timothy Schallert, Terry E Robinson.   

Abstract

We investigated how, under certain circumstances, the expression of psychomotor sensitization comes to be context-specific. Rats that had previously sustained 6-hydroxydopamine-induced unilateral dopamine depletion received repeated injections of d-amphetamine (AMPH) or saline in group-specific environments, and rotational behavior was measured as an index of psychomotor activation. Following these treatments some groups were given electroconvulsive shock (ECS), when memories of the drug experience were reactivated (and therefore vulnerable to disruption), in order to produce retrograde amnesia. Animals given an AMPH challenge in the environment in which they received drug treatments (Paired) expressed robust sensitization. Animals given an AMPH challenge in a context that was never paired with drug administration (Unpaired) did not express sensitization. A saline challenge in the AMPH paired context produced a conditioned rotational response (CR). ECS had no effect in Control animals, no effect on the expression of sensitization in Paired animals, and no effect on the expression of the CR in Paired animals. However, ECS did affect Unpaired groups: unlike Unpaired animals given sham ECS, Unpaired animals given ECS expressed robust sensitization. Thus, without ECS, the expression of sensitization must have been suppressed in the Unpaired animals (who had the same drug history as Paired animals), and ECS released this otherwise suppressed sensitization. Based on these and other findings, we propose that three memory mechanisms regulate context-specificity of AMPH sensitization: (1) Repeated drug administration induces sensitization of the neural substrate that mediates the unconditional response (UR) to the drug, a form of non-associative learning; (2) An inhibitory process can block the expression of neural sensitization in contexts where the drug is not expected, a process we speculate may involve a form of inhibitory occasion-setting; (3) An excitatory conditioned response (CR) can amplify the sensitized response in a context where the drug is expected. It is suggested that the ability of drug-associated contexts to modulate the expression of neural sensitization via occasion-setting may combine with the ability of a drug-associated context to produce conditioned responses, together providing powerful associative control over not only behavioral sensitization, but in addicts, over craving and relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12007741     DOI: 10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00402-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  51 in total

1.  A cocaine cue is more preferred and evokes more frequency-modulated 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to a food cue.

Authors:  Paul J Meyer; Sean T Ma; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  In vivo imaging identifies temporal signature of D1 and D2 medium spiny neurons in cocaine reward.

Authors:  Erin S Calipari; Rosemary C Bagot; Immanuel Purushothaman; Thomas J Davidson; Jordan T Yorgason; Catherine J Peña; Deena M Walker; Stephen T Pirpinias; Kevin G Guise; Charu Ramakrishnan; Karl Deisseroth; Eric J Nestler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Electrophysiological and structural alterations in striatum associated with behavioral sensitization to (±)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (Ecstasy) in rats: role of drug context.

Authors:  K T Ball; C L Wellman; B R Miller; G V Rebec
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Persistence of one-trial cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in young rats: regional differences in Fos immunoreactivity.

Authors:  Sanders A McDougall; Sergios Charntikov; Anthony M Cortez; Dionisio A Amodeo; Cynthia E Martinez; Cynthia A Crawford
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Review. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues.

Authors:  Terry E Robinson; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 5.250

7.  Cocaine deprivation effect: cue abstinence over weekends boosts anticipatory 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in rats.

Authors:  Esther Y Maier; Allison M Ahrens; Sean T Ma; Timothy Schallert; Christine L Duvauchelle
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Environmental and behavioral controls of the expression of clozapine tolerance: evidence from a novel across-model transfer paradigm.

Authors:  Min Feng; Nan Sui; Ming Li
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors modulates the induction and expression of amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization partially through an associated learning of the environment in mice.

Authors:  Anti Kalda; Lenne-Triin Heidmets; Hai-Ying Shen; Alexander Zharkovsky; Jiang-Fan Chen
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Locomotor conditioning by amphetamine requires cyclin-dependent kinase 5 signaling in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Bryan F Singer; Nichole M Neugebauer; Justin Forneris; Kelli R Rodvelt; Dongdong Li; Nancy Bubula; Paul Vezina
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.