Literature DB >> 24949539

Resident participation in laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact of trainee involvement on operative times and surgical outcomes.

Elena Igwe1, Enrique Hernandez1, Stephen Rose2, Shitanshu Uppal3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of resident involvement on morbidity after total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a retrospective review of a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease that was performed with resident involvement vs attending alone between Jan. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2011. Surgical operative times and morbidity and mortality rates were compared. Binary logistic regression was used to control for covariates that were significant on univariate analysis (P < .05).
RESULTS: A total of 3441 patients were identified as having undergone a total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease. The mean age of patients was 47.4 ± 11.1 years; the mean body mass index was 30.6 ± 7.9 kg/m(2). A resident participated in 1591 of cases (46.2%); 1850 of the procedures (53.8%) were done by an attending physician alone. Cases with resident involvement had higher mean age, Charlson morbidity scoring, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification and were more likely to be inpatient cases. With resident involvement, the mean operative time was increased (179.29 vs 135.46 minutes; P < .0001). There were no differences in the rates of experiencing at least 1 complication (6.8% for resident involvement vs 5.4% for attending alone; P = .5), composite severe morbidity (1.3% resident vs 1.0% attending alone), or 30-day mortality rate (0% resident vs 0.1% attending alone). Additionally, there were no differences between groups in the infectious, wound, neurorenal, thromboembolic, septic, and cardiopulmonary complications. Cases with resident involvement had significantly increased rates of postoperative transfusion of packed red blood cells (2% vs 0.4%; P < .0001), reoperation (2.2% vs 1.3%; P = .048), and a 30-day readmission (5.5% vs 2.9%; P = .015). In models that were adjusted for factors that differed between the 2 groups, cases with resident involvement had increased odds of receiving postoperative blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR], 4.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.18-11.33), reoperation (OR, 1.7, 95% CI, 1.01-2.89) and readmission (OR, 1.93, 95% CI, 1.09-3.42).
CONCLUSION: Resident involvement in total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease was associated with clinically appreciable longer surgical time and small differences in the rates of postoperative transfusions, reoperation, and readmission. However, the rates of overall complications, severe complications, and 30-day mortality rate remain comparable.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NSQIP; laparoscopic hysterectomy; resident involvement; surgical outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24949539     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  11 in total

1.  Resident participation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of outcomes from the ACS-NSQIP database.

Authors:  Laura Doyon; Alejandro Moreno-Koehler; Rocco Ricciardi; Dmitry Nepomnayshy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The impact of a simulation-based training lab on outcomes of hysterectomy.

Authors:  Mehmet Reşit Asoğlu; Tamar Achjian; Oğuz Akbilgiç; Mostafa A Borahay; Gökhan S Kılıç
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-01-12

3.  Development of a novel simulation model for assessment of laparoscopic camera navigation.

Authors:  Melissa W Brackmann; Pamela Andreatta; Karen McLean; R Kevin Reynolds
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The impact of teaching on the duration of common urological operations.

Authors:  Blayne Welk; Jennifer Winick-Ng; Andrew McClure; Chris Vinden; Sumit Dave; Stephen Pautler
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Outcomes of minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy with resident operative involvement.

Authors:  Emily A Slopnick; Adonis K Hijaz; J Welles Henderson; Sangeeta T Mahajan; Carvell T Nguyen; Simon P Kim
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Resident participation is not associated with postoperative adverse events, reoperation, or prolonged length of stay following craniotomy for brain tumor resection.

Authors:  Nikita Lakomkin; Constantinos G Hadjipanayis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Development of an evidence-based training program for laparoscopic hysterectomy on a virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  Patrice Crochet; Rajesh Aggarwal; Sophie Knight; Stéphane Berdah; Léon Boubli; Aubert Agostini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Development of an objective assessment tool for total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A Delphi method among experts and evaluation on a virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  Sophie Knight; Rajesh Aggarwal; Aubert Agostini; Anderson Loundou; Stéphane Berdah; Patrice Crochet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Inpatient Clinical Order Patterns Machine-Learned From Teaching Versus Attending-Only Medical Services.

Authors:  Jason K Wang; Alejandro Schuler; Nigam H Shah; Michael T M Baiocchi; Jonathan H Chen
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2018-05-18

10.  Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomies and of abdominal hysterectomies: a case study of 4,895 patients in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.

Authors:  Hongying He; Zhijun Yang; Dingyuan Zeng; Jiangtao Fan; Xiaoxia Hu; Yuan Ye; Hua Bai; Yanming Jiang; Zhong Lin; Zhiying Lei; Xinlin Li; Lian Li; Jinghua Gan; Ying Lan; Xiongzhi Tang; Danxia Wang; Junsong Jiang; Xiaoyan Wu; Meiying Li; Xiaoqing Ren; Xiaomin Yang; Mei Liu; Qinmei Wang; Fuyan Jiang; Li Li
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.