Literature DB >> 27826776

Development of a novel simulation model for assessment of laparoscopic camera navigation.

Melissa W Brackmann1, Pamela Andreatta2, Karen McLean3, R Kevin Reynolds3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic camera navigation is vital to laparoscopic surgery, yet often falls to the most junior member of the surgical team who has limited laparoscopic operating experience. Previously published reports on simulation models fail to address qualitative scoring of movement, method of communication and correct physician location with respect to patient position. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a novel laparoscopic camera navigation simulation model that addresses these deficiencies.
METHODS: A novel, low-cost laparoscopic camera navigational maze was constructed from pliable foam for use in a standard laparoscopic surgery box trainer. Participants (n = 37) completed a camera navigation exercise by following a pre-recorded set of verbal instructions using correct anatomic terminology that is used in the operating room, to simulate an actual operating room experience of receiving verbal cues from senior surgeons. The sample group consisted of participants at various levels of Obstetrics and Gynecology training, representing novice to expert laparoscopists. Each trial was recorded with a multi-channel video camera. Performances were scored by a blinded evaluator for excess gross and fine camera movements as well as overt errors, including camera collisions and failure to follow directions.
RESULTS: Our model demonstrated evidence of validity by discriminating performance by level of laparoscopic experience with a statistically significant decrease in number of movements and errors in experts compared to novices. A trend emerged toward improvement with each additional year of training, with reduced variability among performances in more experienced participants.
CONCLUSIONS: This novel, low-cost box-trainer simulation model for laparoscopic camera navigation offers a mechanism for assessment of laparoscopic camera operation skills. Moreover, this model closely replicates operating room logistics and communication. Given the necessity for improved laparoscopic camera operation education, our model represents a unique, complementary tool to other laparoscopic simulation curricula.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic camera navigation; Simulation; Surgical education

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27826776     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5323-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  A comparison of operative times in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between orthopaedic faculty and residents: the financial impact of orthopaedic surgical training in the operating room.

Authors:  L R Farnworth; D E Lemay; T Wooldridge; J D Mabrey; M J Blaschak; T A DeCoster; D C Wascher; R C Schenck
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2001

2.  A virtual reality surgical trainer for navigation in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R S Haluck; R W Webster; A J Snyder; M G Melkonian; B J Mohler; M L Dise; A Lefever
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2001

3.  Simulation-based training improves applied clinical placement of ultrasound-guided PICCs.

Authors:  Pamela Andreatta; Yifang Chen; Michael Marsh; Kyung Cho
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Validation of a simple camera navigation trainer.

Authors:  Kimberly A Yee; Shahzeer Karmali; Vadim Sherman
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  A M Derossis; G M Fried; M Abrahamowicz; H H Sigman; J S Barkun; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.

Authors:  Diana L Diesen; Loretta Erhunmwunsee; Kyla M Bennett; Kfir Ben-David; Basil Yurcisin; Eugene P Ceppa; Philip A Omotosho; Alexander Perez; Aurora Pryor
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Prospective randomized controlled trial of simulator-based versus traditional in-surgery laparoscopic camera navigation training.

Authors:  Florian M Franzeck; Rachel Rosenthal; Markus K Muller; Antonio Nocito; Frauke Wittich; Christine Maurus; Daniel Dindo; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Benefits of laparoscopy: does the disease condition that indicated colectomy matter?

Authors:  Luiz Felipe de Campos-Lobato; Patricia Cristina Alves-Ferreira; Daniel P Geisler; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Impact of resident surgeons on procedure length based on common pediatric otolaryngology cases.

Authors:  Sidharth V Puram; Elliott D Kozin; Rosh Sethi; Blake Alkire; Daniel J Lee; Stacey T Gray; Mark G Shrime; Michael Cohen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Low-hanging fruit: a clementine as a simulation model for advanced laparoscopy.

Authors:  Pamela Andreatta; David A Marzano; Diana S Curran; Jessica J Klotz; Charlotte R Gamble; R Kevin Reynolds
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.929

View more
  4 in total

1.  Computerized model for objectively evaluating cutting performance using a laparoscopic box trainer simulator.

Authors:  Amir Handelman; Shani Schnaider; Adva Schwartz-Ossad; Refael Barkan; Ronnie Tepper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Impact of visual-spatial ability on laparoscopic camera navigation training.

Authors:  Paul J Roch; Henriette M Rangnick; Julia A Brzoska; Laura Benner; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Philip C Müller; Hannes G Kenngott; Beat-Peter Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The Future in Standards of Care for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery to Improve Training and Education.

Authors:  Vlad I Tica; Andrei A Tica; Rudy L De Wilde
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Rating of camera navigation skills in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  F Huettl; H Lang; M Paschold; F Watzka; N Wachter; B Hensel; W Kneist; Tobias Huber
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 2.571

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.