Literature DB >> 24947658

Myopia and level of education: results from the Gutenberg Health Study.

Alireza Mirshahi1, Katharina A Ponto2, René Hoehn2, Isabella Zwiener3, Tanja Zeller4, Karl Lackner5, Manfred E Beutel6, Norbert Pfeiffer2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the association between myopia and educational level in an adult European cohort.
DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of the Gutenberg Health Study, including 4658 eligible enrollees between 35 and 74 years of age.
METHODS: We applied a standardized protocol entailing a comprehensive questionnaire; thorough ophthalmic, general, cardiovascular, and psychological examinations; and laboratory tests, including genetic analyses. We documented achievement levels in school education and post-school professional education. The spherical equivalent (SE) was determined by noncycloplegic autorefractometry. We fitted mixed linear models including age, gender, and 45 myopia-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) as covariates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence and magnitude of myopia in association with years spent in school and level of post-school professional education.
RESULTS: Individuals who graduated from school after 13 years were more myopic (median, -0.5 diopters [D]; first quartile [Q1]/third quartile [Q3], -2.1/0.3 D) than those who graduated after 10 years (median, -0.2 D; Q1/Q3, -1.3/0.8 D), than those who graduated after 9 years (median, 0.3 D; Q1/Q3, -0.6/1.4 D), and than those who never finished secondary school (median, 0.2 D; Q1/Q3, -0.5/1.8 D; P<0.001, respectively). The same holds true for persons with a university degree (median, -0.6 D; Q1/Q3, -2.3/0.3 D) versus those who finished secondary vocational school (median, 0 D; Q1/Q3, -1.1/0.8 D) or primary vocational school (median, 0 D; Q1/Q3, -0.9/1.1 D) versus persons without any post-school professional qualification (median, 0.6 D; Q1/Q3, -0.4/1.7 D; P<0.001, respectively). Of persons who graduated from school after 13 years, 50.9% were myopic (SE, ≤-0.5 D) versus 41.6%, 27.1%, and 26.9% after 10 years, in those who graduated after 9 years, and in those who never graduated from secondary school, respectively (P<0.001). In university graduates, the proportion of myopic persons was higher (53%) than that of those who graduated from secondary (34.8%) or primary (34.7%) vocational schools and than in those without any professional training (23.9%; P<0.001, respectively). In multivariate analyses: higher school and professional levels of education were associated with a more myopic SE independent of gender. There was a small effect of age and SNPs.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of school and post-school professional education are associated with a more myopic refraction. Participants with higher educational achievements more often were myopic than individuals with less education.
Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24947658     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  50 in total

Review 1.  Stopping the rise of myopia in Asia.

Authors:  Lothar Spillmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  [Ophthalmology 2019-where do we stand? : An analysis of the treatment situation in Germany].

Authors:  Alexander K Schuster; Christian Wolfram; Norbert Pfeiffer; Robert P Finger
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Epidemiology of refractive errors].

Authors:  C Wolfram
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  [Epidemiology of myopia].

Authors:  S Hopf; N Pfeiffer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Machine learning classifiers-based prediction of normal-tension glaucoma progression in young myopic patients.

Authors:  Jinho Lee; Young Kook Kim; Jin Wook Jeoung; Ahnul Ha; Yong Woo Kim; Ki Ho Park
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Preventing Myopia.

Authors:  Wolf A Lagrèze; Frank Schaeffel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Prevalence and associated factors of myopia among primary and middle school-aged students: a school-based study in Guangzhou.

Authors:  L Guo; J Yang; J Mai; X Du; Y Guo; P Li; Y Yue; D Tang; C Lu; W-H Zhang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Prevalence and Time Trends in Myopia Among Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Alexander K Schuster; Laura Krause; Clara Kuchenbäcker; Franziska Prütz; Heike M Elflein; Norbert Pfeiffer; Michael S Urschitz
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 9.  [Current recommendations for deceleration of myopia progression].

Authors:  W A Lagrèze; L Joachimsen; F Schaeffel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  [Analysis of spectacle lens prescriptions shows no increase of myopia in Germany from 2000 to 2015].

Authors:  W Wesemann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.