Literature DB >> 24947275

Role of β-lactamase residues in a common interface for binding the structurally unrelated inhibitory proteins BLIP and BLIP-II.

Bartlomiej G Fryszczyn1, Carolyn J Adamski, Nicholas G Brown, Kacie Rice, Wanzhi Huang, Timothy Palzkill.   

Abstract

The β-lactamase inhibitory proteins (BLIPs) are a model system for examining molecular recognition in protein-protein interactions. BLIP and BLIP-II are structurally unrelated proteins that bind and inhibit TEM-1 β-lactamase. Both BLIPs share a common binding interface on TEM-1 and make contacts with many of the same TEM-1 surface residues. BLIP-II, however, binds TEM-1 over 150-fold tighter than BLIP despite the fact that it has fewer contact residues and a smaller binding interface. The role of eleven TEM-1 amino acid residues that contact both BLIP and BLIP-II was examined by alanine mutagenesis and determination of the association (k on) and dissociation (k off) rate constants for binding each partner. The substitutions had little impact on association rates and resulted in a wide range of dissociation rates as previously observed for substitutions on the BLIP side of the interface. The substitutions also had less effect on binding affinity for BLIP than BLIP-II. This is consistent with the high affinity and small binding interface of the TEM-1-BLIP-II complex, which predicts per residue contributions should be higher for TEM-1 binding to BLIP-II versus BLIP. Two TEM-1 residues (E104 and M129) were found to be hotspots for binding BLIP while five (L102, Y105, P107, K111, and M129) are hotspots for binding BLIP-II with only M129 as a common hotspot for both. Thus, although the same TEM-1 surface binds to both BLIP and BLIP-II, the distribution of binding energy on the surface is different for the two target proteins, that is, different binding strategies are employed.
© 2014 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibiotic resistance; beta-lactamase; binding kinetics; molecular recognition; protein-protein interactions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24947275      PMCID: PMC4243995          DOI: 10.1002/pro.2505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  42 in total

1.  Convergent solutions to binding at a protein-protein interface.

Authors:  W L DeLano; M H Ultsch; A M de Vos; J A Wells
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Predicting the rate enhancement of protein complex formation from the electrostatic energy of interaction.

Authors:  T Selzer; G Schreiber
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-03-26       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Unraveling hot spots in binding interfaces: progress and challenges.

Authors:  Warren L DeLano
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 4.  AKAPs: from structure to function.

Authors:  M Colledge; J D Scott
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 20.808

5.  Determination of accurate KI values for tight-binding enzyme inhibitors: an in silico study of experimental error and assay design.

Authors:  Dennis J Murphy
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  The modular architecture of protein-protein binding interfaces.

Authors:  D Reichmann; O Rahat; S Albeck; R Meged; O Dym; G Schreiber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Contributions of aspartate 49 and phenylalanine 142 residues of a tight binding inhibitory protein of beta-lactamases.

Authors:  J Petrosino; G Rudgers; H Gilbert; T Palzkill
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-01-22       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Identification of the β-lactamase inhibitor protein-II (BLIP-II) interface residues essential for binding affinity and specificity for class A β-lactamases.

Authors:  Nicholas G Brown; Dar-Chone Chow; Kevin E Ruprecht; Timothy Palzkill
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Determinants of binding affinity and specificity for the interaction of TEM-1 and SME-1 beta-lactamase with beta-lactamase inhibitory protein.

Authors:  Zhen Zhang; Timothy Palzkill
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  BeAtMuSiC: Prediction of changes in protein-protein binding affinity on mutations.

Authors:  Yves Dehouck; Jean Marc Kwasigroch; Marianne Rooman; Dimitri Gilis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

1.  BLIP-II Employs Differential Hotspot Residues To Bind Structurally Similar Staphylococcus aureus PBP2a and Class A β-Lactamases.

Authors:  Carolyn J Adamski; Timothy Palzkill
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Structural basis for the hydrolytic dehalogenation of the fungicide chlorothalonil.

Authors:  Daniel S Catlin; Xinhang Yang; Brian Bennett; Richard C Holz; Dali Liu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Deep Sequencing of a Systematic Peptide Library Reveals Conformationally-Constrained Protein Interface Peptides that Disrupt a Protein-Protein Interaction.

Authors:  David M Boragine; Wanzhi Huang; Lynn H Su; Timothy Palzkill
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.164

Review 4.  Tackling the Antibiotic Resistance Caused by Class A β-Lactamases through the Use of β-Lactamase Inhibitory Protein.

Authors:  Warawan Eiamphungporn; Nalini Schaduangrat; Aijaz Ahmad Malik; Chanin Nantasenamat
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.