Literature DB >> 24947206

Genomic comparison of chitinolytic enzyme systems from terrestrial and aquatic bacteria.

Yani Bai1, Vincent G H Eijsink2, Anna M Kielak1, Johannes A van Veen1,3, Wietse de Boer1,4.   

Abstract

Chitin degradation ability is known for many aquatic and terrestrial bacterial species. However, differences in the composition of chitin resources between aquatic (mainly exoskeletons of crustaceans) and terrestrial (mainly fungal cell walls) habitats may have resulted in adaptation of chitinolytic enzyme systems to the prevalent resources. We screened publicly available terrestrial and aquatic chitinase-containing bacterial genomes for possible differences in the composition of their chitinolytic enzyme systems. The results show significant differences between terrestrial and aquatic bacterial genomes in the modular composition of chitinases (i.e. presence of different types of carbohydrate binding modules). Terrestrial Actinobacteria appear to be best adapted to use a wide variety of chitin resources as they have the highest number of chitinase genes, the highest diversity of associated carbohydrate-binding modules and the highest number of CBM33-type lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases. Actinobacteria do also have the highest fraction of genomes containing β-1, 3-glucanases, enzymes that may reinforce the potential for degrading fungal cell walls. The fraction of bacterial chitinase-containing genomes encoding polyketide synthases was much higher for terrestrial bacteria than for aquatic ones supporting the idea that the combined production of antibiotics and cell-wall degrading chitinases can be an important strategy in antagonistic interactions with fungi.
© 2014 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24947206     DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.12545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 1462-2912            Impact factor:   5.491


  26 in total

1.  Laterally Transferred Gene Recruited as a Venom in Parasitoid Wasps.

Authors:  Ellen O Martinson; Vincent G Martinson; Rachel Edwards; John H Werren
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 2.  Forest Soil Bacteria: Diversity, Involvement in Ecosystem Processes, and Response to Global Change.

Authors:  Salvador Lladó; Rubén López-Mondéjar; Petr Baldrian
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 3.  Physiological and Molecular Understanding of Bacterial Polysaccharide Monooxygenases.

Authors:  Marco Agostoni; John A Hangasky; Michael A Marletta
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Characterizing the oral and distal gut microbiota of the threatened southern sea otter (Enhydra lutris nereis) to enhance conservation practice.

Authors:  Natasha K Dudek; Alexandra D Switzer; Elizabeth K Costello; Michael J Murray; Joseph A Tomoleoni; Michelle M Staedler; M Tim Tinker; David A Relman
Journal:  Conserv Sci Pract       Date:  2022-01-31

5.  Natural photoredox catalysts promote light-driven lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase reactions and enzymatic turnover of biomass.

Authors:  Eirik G Kommedal; Fredrikke Sæther; Thomas Hahn; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Exploration of genomic and functional features of chitinolytic bacterium Streptomyces chilikensis RC1830, isolated from Chilika Lake, India.

Authors:  Himadri Tanaya Behera; Abhik Mojumdar; Khushbu Kumari; Sudhansu Kumar Gouda; Smrutiranjan Das; Lopamudra Ray
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 2.893

Review 7.  Oxygen Activation by Cu LPMOs in Recalcitrant Carbohydrate Polysaccharide Conversion to Monomer Sugars.

Authors:  Katlyn K Meier; Stephen M Jones; Thijs Kaper; Henrik Hansson; Martijn J Koetsier; Saeid Karkehabadi; Edward I Solomon; Mats Sandgren; Bradley Kelemen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Short-Term Nitrogen Fertilization Affects Microbial Community Composition and Nitrogen Mineralization Functions in an Agricultural Soil.

Authors:  Yang Ouyang; Jeanette M Norton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Mutualistic interaction of native Serratia marcescens UENF-22GI with Trichoderma longibrachiatum UENF-F476 boosting seedling growth of tomato and papaya.

Authors:  Régis Josué de Andrade Reis; Alice Ferreira Alves; Pedro Henrique Dias Dos Santos; Kamilla Pereira Aguiar; Letícia Oliveira da Rocha; Silvaldo Felipe da Silveira; Luciano Pasqualoto Canellas; Fabio Lopes Olivares
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Antifungal Rhizosphere Bacteria Can increase as Response to the Presence of Saprotrophic Fungi.

Authors:  Wietse de Boer; Maria P J Hundscheid; Paulien J A Klein Gunnewiek; Annelies S de Ridder-Duine; Cecile Thion; Johannes A van Veen; Annemieke van der Wal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.