Literature DB >> 24946390

A social values analysis of parental decision making.

Rebecca A Dore, Eric R Stone, Christy M Buchanan.   

Abstract

Social values theory was used to examine how parents make decisions for their adolescent children. Social values theory states that decision making for others is based on the social value of an action, leading to a norm for how to decide for others, whereas self decisions are influenced by a number of additional factors. Consistent with a risk-aversion norm, in hypothetical health and safety scenarios parents made more risk and inconvenience affected self decisions more risk-averse decisions for their adolescent children than for themselves. Further, the level of riske than decisions for one's child. A second study showed that the norm was stronger for decisions for one's child than for oneself and more related to parents' decisions for their child than for themselves. In sum, parents' decisions for their children seem to be largely determined by a norm stating how they are supposed to decide, at least in the domain of health and safety. Implications for both the judgment and decision making and parenting literatures are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24946390     DOI: 10.1080/00223980.2013.808603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3980


  6 in total

1.  Why Do Parents Grant or Deny Consent for Adolescent Participation in Sexuality Research?

Authors:  Kristin L Moilanen
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2016-02-24

2.  Using classification and regression tree analysis to explore parental influenza vaccine decisions.

Authors:  Yuki Lama; Gregory R Hancock; Vicki S Freimuth; Amelia M Jamison; Sandra Crouse Quinn
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Perceived Social Norms Guide Health Care Decisions for Oneself and Others: A Cross-Sectional Experiment in a US Online Panel.

Authors:  JoNell Strough; Eric R Stone; Andrew M Parker; Wändi Bruine de Bruin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Payments and freedoms: Effects of monetary and legal incentives on COVID-19 vaccination intentions in Germany.

Authors:  Philipp Sprengholz; Luca Henkel; Cornelia Betsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  On the Likelihood of Surrogates Conforming to the Substituted Judgment Standard When Making End-of-Life Decisions for Their Partner.

Authors:  Eleonore Batteux; Eamonn Ferguson; Richard J Tunney
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  A mixed methods investigation of end-of-life surrogate decisions among older adults.

Authors:  Eleonore Batteux; Eamonn Ferguson; Richard J Tunney
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.234

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.