AIM: To determine if diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with increased risk of colorectal adenomas in younger subjects. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 375 patients undergoing index colonoscopy at a single tertiary care center in the United States. Three cohorts of patients matched for exam date and gender were compared: (1) ages 40-49 years with DM; (2) ages 40-49 years without DM; and (3) ages 50-59 years without DM. Data collected included demographics, co-morbidities, colonoscopy and pathology results. Adenoma detection rates (ADR) were calculated and compared. Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between each cohort and ADR. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-five patients ages 40-49 with DM met study eligibility criteria. Patients in the other two cohorts were randomly selected, matching for date of exam and gender. ADR was 14.4% in those ages 40-49 years without DM, 30.4% in those ages 40-49 years with DM, and 32.0% in those ages 50-59 years without DM. Compared to those ages 40-49 years without DM, ADR was higher in those ages 40-49 years with DM (OR = 3.1; 95%CI: 1.5-6.4; P = 0.002) and those ages 50-59 years without DM (OR = 2.9; 95%CI: 1.5-5.6; P = 0.002). There was no difference between the ADR in those ages 40-49 years with DM and those ages 50-59 years without DM (P = 0.83). CONCLUSION: DM was associated with higher risk of colorectal adenomas in patients ages 40-49 years. These subjects harbored as many adenomas as those at the standard screening age of 50-59 years without DM.
AIM: To determine if diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with increased risk of colorectal adenomas in younger subjects. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 375 patients undergoing index colonoscopy at a single tertiary care center in the United States. Three cohorts of patients matched for exam date and gender were compared: (1) ages 40-49 years with DM; (2) ages 40-49 years without DM; and (3) ages 50-59 years without DM. Data collected included demographics, co-morbidities, colonoscopy and pathology results. Adenoma detection rates (ADR) were calculated and compared. Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between each cohort and ADR. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-five patients ages 40-49 with DM met study eligibility criteria. Patients in the other two cohorts were randomly selected, matching for date of exam and gender. ADR was 14.4% in those ages 40-49 years without DM, 30.4% in those ages 40-49 years with DM, and 32.0% in those ages 50-59 years without DM. Compared to those ages 40-49 years without DM, ADR was higher in those ages 40-49 years with DM (OR = 3.1; 95%CI: 1.5-6.4; P = 0.002) and those ages 50-59 years without DM (OR = 2.9; 95%CI: 1.5-5.6; P = 0.002). There was no difference between the ADR in those ages 40-49 years with DM and those ages 50-59 years without DM (P = 0.83). CONCLUSION:DM was associated with higher risk of colorectal adenomas in patients ages 40-49 years. These subjects harbored as many adenomas as those at the standard screening age of 50-59 years without DM.
Authors: Douglas K Rex; John H Bond; Sidney Winawer; Theodore R Levin; Randall W Burt; David A Johnson; Lynne M Kirk; Scott Litlin; David A Lieberman; Jerome D Waye; James Church; John B Marshall; Robert H Riddell Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Robert E Schoen; Joel L Weissfeld; Lewis H Kuller; F Leland Thaete; Rhobert W Evans; Richard B Hayes; Clifford J Rosen Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: F B Hu; J E Manson; S Liu; D Hunter; G A Colditz; K B Michels; F E Speizer; E Giovannucci Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1999-03-17 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Andrew G Renehan; Marcel Zwahlen; Christoph Minder; Sarah T O'Dwyer; Stephen M Shalet; Matthias Egger Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-04-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kay-Tee Khaw; Nicholas Wareham; Sheila Bingham; Robert Luben; Ailsa Welch; Nicholas Day Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Mehulkumar K Kanadiya; Tushar D Gohel; Madhusudhan R Sanaka; Prashanthi N Thota; Jay H Shubrook Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Daniel Restifo; Joni S Williams; Emma Garacci; Rebekah J Walker; Mukoso N Ozieh; Leonard E Egede Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Lorne J Hofseth; James R Hebert; Anindya Chanda; Hexin Chen; Bryan L Love; Maria M Pena; E Angela Murphy; Mathew Sajish; Amit Sheth; Phillip J Buckhaults; Franklin G Berger Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Celina N Santiago; Samara Rifkin; Julia Drewes; Gerard Mullin; Emma Spence; Linda M Hylind; Joell J Gills; David Kafonek; David M Cromwell; Louis La Luna; Francis Giardello; Cynthia L Sears Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2021-05-04