Literature DB >> 24944365

Comparison of three oral rehydration strategies in the treatment of acute diarrhea in a tropical country.

Salvatore Pignatelli1, Salvatore Musumeci2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The administration of hydrating solutions and early refeeding improve recovery for infants and children with diarrhea.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a low-osmolarity (30 mEq/L Na(+)) solution administered after the standard, high-osmolarity (90 mEq/L Na(+)) solution via a nasogastric tube (NGT) and followed by early refeeding to achieve more rapid body weight recovery in infants and children with acute diarrhea.
METHODS: Infants and children aged <5 years with acute diarrhea and dehydration (body weight loss of ≥10%) observed from January to August 2001 at Saint Camille Medical Center, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, were enrolled. Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment protocols. Patients in group A received, via NGT, rehydration with a high-osmolarity solution for 3 hours, followed by a low-osmolarity solution for at least 3 additional hours. Patients in group B were given only a low-osmolarity solution via NGT. In group C, rehydration was carried out using a high-osmolarity solution via NGT.
RESULTS: Four thousand consecutively treated infants and children (2010 boys, 1990 girls; mean [SD] age, 3.5 [2.7] years) were enrolled. After the first 6 hours of infusion, 90% of the patients who had received the combined rehydration (group A) showed significant body weight recovery, versus 80% and 79% of the patients in groups B and C, respectively. Stool output significantly decreased for group A compared with groups B and C (114 vs 125 and 120 g/kg, respectively). Only 7% of the patients in group A required prolonged rehydration (>6 hours) with the low-osmolarity solution, versus 10% and 12% in groups B and C, respectively. A total of 3% of patients treated with combined rehydration required hospitalization, compared with 10% and 9% in groups B and C, respectively. At the end of infusion, 25% of the patients rehydrated only with a low-osmolarity solution showed poor body weight recovery and appeared lethargic, versus 10% in group A and 15% in group C. Patients who were rehydrated with a high-osmolarity solution showed symptoms of hypernatremia (serum Na(+) concentration >140 mEq/L). At the end of rehydration (≥6 hours), all patients recovered their previous body weight, partially or totally, and refeeding was begun. Rehydration and diet were continued at home, or in neighboring areas for those living far away.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study population, the administration of a high-osmolarity solution followed by a low-osmolarity solution and early refeeding was effective in the treatment of acute diarrhea and was well tolerated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diarrhea; low-osmolarity rehydration; refeeding

Year:  2003        PMID: 24944365      PMCID: PMC4052989          DOI: 10.1016/S0011-393X(03)00021-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp        ISSN: 0011-393X


  13 in total

1.  Recommendations for composition of oral rehydration solutions for the children of Europe. Report of an ESPGAN Working Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.839

2.  Treating diarrhoea. Rehydration should have been emphasised.

Authors:  G Parkes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-11-22

Review 3.  Enhancing clinical efficacy of oral rehydration therapy: is low osmolality the key?

Authors:  A V Thillainayagam; J B Hunt; M J Farthing
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Efficacy and safety of oral rehydration solution with reduced osmolarity in adults with cholera: a randomised double-blind clinical trial. CHOICE study group.

Authors:  N H Alam; R N Majumder; G J Fuchs
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-07-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution for treating dehydration due to diarrhoea in children: systematic review.

Authors:  S Hahn; Y Kim; P Garner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-14

6.  Estimates of morbidity and mortality rates for diarrheal diseases in American children.

Authors:  R I Glass; J F Lew; R E Gangarosa; C W LeBaron; M S Ho
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a reduced osmolarity oral rehydration salts solution in children with acute watery diarrhea.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Is a low-osmolarity ORS solution more efficacious than standard WHO ORS solution?

Authors:  M el-Mougi; N el-Akkad; A Hendawi; M Hassan; A Amer; O Fontaine; N F Pierce
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.839

9.  Clinical experience with a hypotonic oral rehydration solution in acute diarrhoea.

Authors:  T Rautanen; S el-Radhi; T Vesikari
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.299

10.  A double-blind clinical trial comparing World Health Organization oral rehydration solution with a reduced osmolarity solution containing equal amounts of sodium and glucose.

Authors:  M Santosham; I Fayad; M Abu Zikri; A Hussein; A Amponsah; C Duggan; M Hashem; N el Sady; M Abu Zikri; O Fontaine
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.