Literature DB >> 24942626

Characterizing the ex vivo mechanical properties of synthetic polypropylene surgical mesh.

Xinxin Li1, Jennifer A Kruger2, Jessica W Y Jor3, Vivien Wong4, Hans P Dietz5, Martyn P Nash6, Poul M F Nielsen7.   

Abstract

The use of synthetic polypropylene mesh for hernia surgical repair and the correction of female pelvic organ prolapse have been controversial due to increasing post-operative complications, including mesh erosion, chronic pain, infection and support failure. These morbidities may be related to a mismatch of mechanical properties between soft tissues and the mesh. The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of the biomechanical behavior of Prolene polypropylene mesh (Ethicon, Sommerville, NJ, USA), which is widely used for a variety of surgical repair procedures. The stiffness and permanent deformation of Prolene mesh were compared in different directions by performing uniaxial tensile failure tests, cyclic and creep tests at simulated physiological loads in the coursewise (0°), walewise (90°) and the diagonal (45°) directions. Failure tests suggest that the mechanical properties of the mesh is anisotropic; with response at 0° being the most compliant while 90° was the stiffest. Irreversible deformation and viscoelastic behavior were observed in both cyclic and creep tests. The anisotropic property may be relevant to the placement of mesh in surgery to maximize long term mesh performance. The considerable permanent deformation may be associated with an increased risk of post-operative support failure.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anisotropy; Hernia; Mechanical properties; Polypropylene mesh; Viscoelasticity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24942626     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  8 in total

1.  Mesh implants: An overview of crucial mesh parameters.

Authors:  Lei-Ming Zhu; Philipp Schuster; Uwe Klinge
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-27

2.  Analyzing material changes consistent with degradation of explanted polymeric hernia mesh related to clinical characteristics.

Authors:  Xinyue Lu; Melinda Harman; B Todd Heniford; Vedra Augenstein; Brittney McIver; William Bridges
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  International guidelines for groin hernia management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Developing Repair Materials for Stress Urinary Incontinence to Withstand Dynamic Distension.

Authors:  Christopher J Hillary; Sabiniano Roman; Anthony J Bullock; Nicola H Green; Christopher R Chapple; Sheila MacNeil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Physical Characteristics of Medical Textile Prostheses Designed for Hernia Repair: A Comprehensive Analysis of Select Commercial Devices.

Authors:  Linli Miao; Fang Wang; Lu Wang; Ting Zou; Gaétan Brochu; Robert Guidoin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 6.  Past, Present and Future of Surgical Meshes: A Review.

Authors:  Karen Baylón; Perla Rodríguez-Camarillo; Alex Elías-Zúñiga; Jose Antonio Díaz-Elizondo; Robert Gilkerson; Karen Lozano
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-22

7.  Structural differences and architectural features of two different polypropylene slings (TVT-O and I-STOP) have no impact on biocompatibility and tissue reactions.

Authors:  Mikolaj Przydacz; Oussama El Yazami Adli; Wally Mahfouz; Oleg Loutochin; Louis R Bégin; Jacques Corcos
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-04-14

8.  3D Printing of Drug-Loaded Thermoplastic Polyurethane Meshes: A Potential Material for Soft Tissue Reinforcement in Vaginal Surgery.

Authors:  Juan Domínguez-Robles; Caterina Mancinelli; Elena Mancuso; Inmaculada García-Romero; Brendan F Gilmore; Luca Casettari; Eneko Larrañeta; Dimitrios A Lamprou
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 6.321

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.