Literature DB >> 24942596

Adherence to enhanced recovery after surgery protocols across a high-volume gastrointestinal surgical service.

John S Hammond1, Sarah Humphries, Nick Simson, Helen Scrimshaw, James Catton, Christopher Gornall, Charles Maxwell-Armstrong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been shown to improve outcomes for patients following gastrointestinal surgery. Data on protocol adherence and how this impacts on outcome are limited. This study examines how protocol adherence changes over time and determines how this impacts on outcome across a large-volume gastrointestinal surgical service.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective review of patients eligible for colorectal, liver and oesophagogastric ERAS over two 3-month periods in 2010 and 2011 was performed. End points included: length of stay (LOS), overall protocol adherence, individual modality adherence, reason for pathway deviation and patient outcomes.
RESULTS: 172 patients (110 colorectal, 31 liver and 31 oesophagogastric) were evaluated. For each sub-speciality, the introduction of ERAS led to significant reductions in LOS that were sustained for the duration of the study. Adherence was achieved across 60% (colorectal), 75% (liver) and 88% (oesophagogastric) of individual pathway modalities. The major causes of pathway deviation were: post-operative nausea and vomiting (colorectal), pain (liver) and pulmonary complications (oesophagogastric).
CONCLUSIONS: Large-scale implementation of ERAS at a high-volume centre is feasible and offers many of the benefits demonstrated in controlled trials, but adherence may diminish over time.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24942596     DOI: 10.1159/000362097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  10 in total

1.  Ongoing evolution of practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: 2014 report from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Continuing Education Committee.

Authors:  Elisabeth C McLemore; John T Paige; Simon Bergman; Yumi Hori; Erin Schwarz; Timothy M Farrell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Donald E Low; William Allum; Giovanni De Manzoni; Lorenzo Ferri; Arul Immanuel; MadhanKumar Kuppusamy; Simon Law; Mats Lindblad; Nick Maynard; Joseph Neal; C S Pramesh; Mike Scott; B Mark Smithers; Valérie Addor; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  An investigation into the nutritional status of patients receiving an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol versus standard care following Oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Katie Benton; Iain Thomson; Elisabeth Isenring; B Mark Smithers; Ekta Agarwal
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  The effect of enhanced recovery after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yaxing Shen; Xiaosang Chen; Junyi Hou; Youwen Chen; Yong Fang; Zhanggang Xue; Xavier Benoit D'Journo; Robert J Cerfolio; Hiran C Fernando; Alfonso Fiorelli; Alessandro Brunelli; Jing Cang; Lijie Tan; Hao Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Implementation of Enhanced Recovery (ERAS) in Colorectal Surgery Has a Positive Impact on Non-ERAS Liver Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Ismail Labgaa; Ghada Jarrar; Gaëtan-Romain Joliat; Pierre Allemann; Sylvain Gander; Catherine Blanc; Martin Hübner; Nicolas Demartines
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  An enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery is associated with decreased organ level rates of complications: a difference-in-differences analysis.

Authors:  Alexander T Hawkins; Timothy M Geiger; Adam B King; Jonathan P Wanderer; Vikram Tiwari; Roberta L Muldoon; Molly M Ford; Roger R Dmochowski; Warren S Sandberg; Barbara Martin; M Benjamin Hopkins; Matthew D McEvoy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  ERAS in laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Aditya J Nanavati
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 8.  Fast track program in liver resection: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emad Ali Ahmed; Roberto Montalti; Daniele Nicolini; Paolo Vincenzi; Martina Coletta; Andrea Vecchi; Federico Mocchegiani; Marco Vivarelli
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  A perioperative consult service results in reduction in cost and length of stay for colorectal surgical patients: evidence from a healthcare redesign project.

Authors:  Matthew D McEvoy; Jonathan P Wanderer; Adam B King; Timothy M Geiger; Vikram Tiwari; Maxim Terekhov; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; William R Furman; Lorri A Lee; Warren S Sandberg
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-05

10.  Development of a telehealth monitoring service after colorectal surgery: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Damian D Bragg; Helena Edis; Sian Clark; Simon L Parsons; Binoy Perumpalath; Dileep N Lobo; Charles A Maxwell-Armstrong
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-09-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.