Literature DB >> 24940618

Local signaling from a retinal prosthetic in a rodent retinitis pigmentosa model in vivo.

James W Fransen1, Gobinda Pangeni, Machelle T Pardue, Maureen A McCall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In clinical trials, retinitis pigmentosa patients implanted with a retinal prosthetic device show enhanced spatial vision, including the ability to read large text and navigate. New prosthetics aim to increase spatial resolution by decreasing pixel/electrode size and limiting current spread. To examine spatial resolution of a new prosthetic design, we characterized and compared two photovoltaic array (PVA) designs and their interaction with the retina after subretinal implantation in transgenic S334ter line 3 rats (Tg S334ter-3). APPROACH: PVAs were implanted subretinally at two stages of degeneration and assessed in vivo using extracellular recordings in the superior colliculus (SC). Several aspects of this interaction were evaluated by varying duration, irradiance and position of a near infrared laser focused on the PVA. These characteristics included: activation threshold, response linearity, SC signal topography and spatial localization. The major design difference between the two PVA designs is the inclusion of local current returns in the newer design. MAIN
RESULTS: When tested in vivo, PVA-evoked response thresholds were independent of pixel/electrode size, but differ between the new and old PVA designs. Response thresholds were independent of implantation age and duration (⩽7.5 months). For both prosthesis designs, threshold intensities were within established safety limits. PVA-evoked responses require inner retina synaptic transmission and do not directly activate retinal ganglion cells. The new PVA design evokes local retinal activation, which is not found with the older PVA design that lacks local current returns. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study provides in vivo evidence that prosthetics make functional contacts with the inner nuclear layer at several stages of degeneration. The new PVA design enhances local activation within the retina and SC. Together these results predict that the new design can potentially harness the inherent processing within the retina and is likely to produce higher spatial resolution in patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24940618      PMCID: PMC4128185          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/4/046012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  49 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation in isolated rabbit retina.

Authors:  Jeng-Shyong Shyu; Mauricio Maia; James D Weiland; Thomas Ohearn; Shih-Jen Chen; Eyal Margalit; Satoshi Suzuki; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Optoelectronic retinal prosthesis: system design and performance.

Authors:  J D Loudin; D M Simanovskii; K Vijayraghavan; C K Sramek; A F Butterwick; P Huie; G Y McLean; D V Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 3.  Neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.590

4.  Mechanisms of rhodopsin inactivation in vivo as revealed by a COOH-terminal truncation mutant.

Authors:  J Chen; C L Makino; N S Peachey; D A Baylor; M I Simon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Discordant anatomical, electrophysiological, and visual behavioral profiles of retinal degeneration in rat models of retinal degenerative disease.

Authors:  Trevor J McGill; Glen T Prusky; Robert M Douglas; Douglas Yasumura; Michael T Matthes; Robert J Lowe; Jacque L Duncan; Haidong Yang; Kelly Ahern; Kate M Daniello; Byron Silver; Matthew M LaVail
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Neuroprotective effect of subretinal implants in the RCS rat.

Authors:  Machelle T Pardue; Michael J Phillips; Hang Yin; Brian D Sippy; Sarah Webb-Wood; Alan Y Chow; Sherry L Ball
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Topography of visual and somatosensory projections to mouse superior colliculus.

Authors:  U C Dräger; D H Hubel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Activation of retinal ganglion cells in wild-type and rd1 mice through electrical stimulation of the retinal neural network.

Authors:  Ralph J Jensen; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words.

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Heval Benav; Dorothea Besch; Anna Bruckmann; Veit-Peter Gabel; Florian Gekeler; Udo Greppmaier; Alex Harscher; Steffen Kibbel; Johannes Koch; Akos Kusnyerik; Tobias Peters; Katarina Stingl; Helmut Sachs; Alfred Stett; Peter Szurman; Barbara Wilhelm; Robert Wilke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Subretinal electrical stimulation preserves inner retinal function in RCS rat retina.

Authors:  Vincent T Ciavatta; Julie A Mocko; Moon K Kim; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.367

View more
  7 in total

1.  Integration of Perforated Subretinal Prostheses With Retinal Tissue.

Authors:  Adewumi N Adekunle; Alice Adkins; Wei Wang; Henry J Kaplan; Juan Fernandez de Castro; Sang Joon Lee; Philip Huie; Daniel Palanker; Maureen McCall; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.283

2.  Phenotypic characterization of P23H and S334ter rhodopsin transgenic rat models of inherited retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Matthew M LaVail; Shimpei Nishikawa; Roy H Steinberg; Muna I Naash; Jacque L Duncan; Nikolaus Trautmann; Michael T Matthes; Douglas Yasumura; Cathy Lau-Villacorta; Jeannie Chen; Ward M Peterson; Haidong Yang; John G Flannery
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  Improving the spatial resolution of epiretinal implants by increasing stimulus pulse duration.

Authors:  Andrew C Weitz; Devyani Nanduri; Matthew R Behrend; Alejandra Gonzalez-Calle; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Inner retinal preservation in rat models of retinal degeneration implanted with subretinal photovoltaic arrays.

Authors:  Jacob G Light; James W Fransen; Adewumi N Adekunle; Alice Adkins; Gobinda Pangeni; James Loudin; Keith Mathieson; Daniel V Palanker; Maureen A McCall; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Functional changes in Tg P23H-1 rat retinal responses: differences between ON and OFF pathway transmission to the superior colliculus.

Authors:  James W Fransen; Gobinda Pangeni; Ian S Pyle; Maureen A McCall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Probing the functional impact of sub-retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Sébastien Roux; Frédéric Matonti; Florent Dupont; Louis Hoffart; Sylvain Takerkart; Serge Picaud; Pascale Pham; Frédéric Chavane
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Photovoltaic restoration of sight with high visual acuity.

Authors:  Henri Lorach; Georges Goetz; Richard Smith; Xin Lei; Yossi Mandel; Theodore Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Philip Huie; James Harris; Alexander Sher; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 53.440

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.