BACKGROUND: Better knowledge of patient and cancer treatment factors associated with nausea/vomiting (NV) in pediatric oncology patients could enhance prophylaxis. We aimed to describe such factors in children receiving treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: Retrospective longitudinal cohort study of 1,668 hospitalized children undergoing treatment for AML from the Pediatric Health Information System database (39 hospitals, 1999-2010). Antiemetic alteration, which included switch (a change in prescribed 5-HT₃ receptor antagonists) and rescue (receipt of an adjunct antiemetic), were first validated and then used as surrogates of problematic NV. Logistic and negative binomial regression modeling were used to test whether patient characteristics were associated with problematic NV. RESULTS: Increasing age is associated with greater odds of experiencing antiemetic switch and higher relative rate of antiemetic rescue. Within a treatment cycle, each consecutive inpatient chemotherapy day decreased the likelihood of requiring antiemetic alteration. Each consecutive inpatient-day post-chemotherapy was associated with decreased need for switch, but increased need for rescue. Subsequent cycles of AML therapy were associated with lower odds of antiemetic switch on both chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy days, a lower rate of antiemetic rescue on chemotherapy days, and an increased rate of rescue on non-chemotherapy days. CONCLUSION: In pediatric patients with AML, increasing age is strongly associated with greater antiemetic alteration. Antiemetic alteration occurs early in treatment overall, and early within each admission. While additional cycles of therapy are associated with less alteration overall, there is persistent rescue in the days after chemotherapy, suggesting additional etiologies of NV in pediatric cancer patients.
BACKGROUND: Better knowledge of patient and cancer treatment factors associated with nausea/vomiting (NV) in pediatric oncology patients could enhance prophylaxis. We aimed to describe such factors in children receiving treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: Retrospective longitudinal cohort study of 1,668 hospitalized children undergoing treatment for AML from the Pediatric Health Information System database (39 hospitals, 1999-2010). Antiemetic alteration, which included switch (a change in prescribed 5-HT₃ receptor antagonists) and rescue (receipt of an adjunct antiemetic), were first validated and then used as surrogates of problematic NV. Logistic and negative binomial regression modeling were used to test whether patient characteristics were associated with problematic NV. RESULTS: Increasing age is associated with greater odds of experiencing antiemetic switch and higher relative rate of antiemetic rescue. Within a treatment cycle, each consecutive inpatient chemotherapy day decreased the likelihood of requiring antiemetic alteration. Each consecutive inpatient-day post-chemotherapy was associated with decreased need for switch, but increased need for rescue. Subsequent cycles of AML therapy were associated with lower odds of antiemetic switch on both chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy days, a lower rate of antiemetic rescue on chemotherapy days, and an increased rate of rescue on non-chemotherapy days. CONCLUSION: In pediatric patients with AML, increasing age is strongly associated with greater antiemetic alteration. Antiemetic alteration occurs early in treatment overall, and early within each admission. While additional cycles of therapy are associated with less alteration overall, there is persistent rescue in the days after chemotherapy, suggesting additional etiologies of NV in pediatric cancerpatients.
Authors: Carmen R Green; Karen O Anderson; Tamara A Baker; Lisa C Campbell; Sheila Decker; Roger B Fillingim; Donna A Kalauokalani; Donna A Kaloukalani; Kathyrn E Lasch; Cynthia Myers; Raymond C Tait; Knox H Todd; April H Vallerand Journal: Pain Med Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Brian T Fisher; Sonia Singh; Yuan-Shung Huang; Yimei Li; John Gregory; Dana Walker; Alix E Seif; Marko Kavcic; Richard Aplenc Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: L Lee Dupuis; Sabrina Boodhan; Mark Holdsworth; Paula D Robinson; Richard Hain; Carol Portwine; Erin O'Shaughnessy; Lillian Sung Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Shana S Jacobs; Jeffrey S Dome; Jiaxiang Gai; Andrea M Gross; Elena Postell; Pamela S Hinds; Lionel Davenport; John N van den Anker; Catriona Mowbray Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Helen Vol; Jacqueline Flank; Sara R Lavoratore; Paul C Nathan; Tracey Taylor; Elyse Zelunka; Anne Marie Maloney; L Lee Dupuis Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: L Lee Dupuis; Xiaomin Lu; Hannah-Rose Mitchell; Lillian Sung; Meenakshi Devidas; Leonard A Mattano; William L Carroll; Naomi Winick; Stephen P Hunger; Kelly W Maloney; Nina S Kadan-Lottick Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Joseph E Rower; Amber D King; Diana Wilkins; Jacob Wilkes; Venkata Yellepeddi; Luke Maese; Richard S Lemons; Jonathan E Constance Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Yimei Li; Matt Hall; Brian T Fisher; Alix E Seif; Yuan-Shung Huang; Rochelle Bagatell; Kelly D Getz; Todd A Alonzo; Robert B Gerbing; Lillian Sung; Peter C Adamson; Alan Gamis; Richard Aplenc Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Antonio Ruggiero; Daniela Rizzo; Martina Catalano; Paola Coccia; Silvia Triarico; Giorgio Attiná Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 1.671