Literature DB >> 24938394

Cost of practice in a tertiary/quaternary referral center: is it sustainable?

K G Cologne1, G S Hwang, A J Senagore.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Third-party payers are moving toward a bundled care payment system. This means that there will need to be a warranty cost of care-where the cost of complexity and complication rates is built into the bundled payment. The theoretical benefit of this system is that providers with lower complication rates will be able to provide care with lower warranty costs and lower overall costs. This may also result in referring riskier patients to tertiary or quaternary referral centers. Unless the payment model truly covers the higher cost of managing such referred cases, the economic risk may be unsustainable for these centers.
METHODS: We took the last seven patients that were referred by other surgeons as "too high risk" for colectomy at other centers. A contribution margin was calculated using standard Medicare reimbursement rates at our institution and cost of care based on our administrative database. We then recalculated a contribution margin assuming a 3 % reduction in payment for a higher than average readmission rate, like that which will take effect in 2014. Finally, we took into account the cost of any readmissions.
RESULTS: Seven patients with diagnosis related group (DRG) 330 were reviewed with an average age of 66.8 ± 16 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists score 2.3 ± 1.0, body mass index 31.6 ± 9.8 kg/m(2) (range 22-51 kg/m(2)). There was a 57 % readmission rate, 29 % reoperation rate, 10.8 ± 7.7 day average initial length of stay with 14 ± 8.6 day average readmission length of stay. Forty-two percent were discharged to a location other than home. Seventy-one percent of these patients had Medicare insurance. The case mix index was 2.45. Average reimbursement for DRG 330 was $17,084 (based on Medicare data) for our facility in 2012, with the national average being $12,520. The total contribution margin among all cases collectively was -$19,122 ± 13,285 (average per patient -$2,731, range -$21,905-$12,029). Assuming a 3 % reimbursement reduction made the overall contribution margin -$22,122 ± 13,285 (average -$3,244). Including the cost of readmission in the variable cost made the contribution margin -$115,741 ± 16,023 (average -$16,534).
CONCLUSIONS: Care of high-risk patients at tertiary and quaternary referral centers is a very expensive proposition and can lead to financial ruin under the current reimbursement system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24938394     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-014-1175-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  24 in total

1.  Can reoperative surgery be profitable? Maximizing reimbursement.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11

Review 2.  The impact of obesity on surgical outcomes: a review.

Authors:  P S Choban; L Flancbaum
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Who pays for poor surgical quality? Building a business case for quality improvement.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; William B Weeks; Raj J Karia; Smita Das; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Enhanced recovery protocol: implementation at a county institution with limited resources.

Authors:  Kais Rona; J Choi; G Sigle; S Kidd; G Ault; A J Senagore
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Obesity: is there an increase in perioperative complications in those undergoing elective colon and rectal resection for carcinoma?

Authors:  Thomas H Blee; G Eric Belzer; Pamela J Lambert
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  'Fast track' postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  C P Delaney; V W Fazio; A J Senagore; B Robinson; A L Halverson; F H Remzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Medicare payments for common inpatient procedures: implications for episode-based payment bundling.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Cathryn Gust; Onur Baser; Justin B Dimick; Jason M Sutherland; Jonathan S Skinner
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Anticipating the effects of accountable care organizations for inpatient surgery.

Authors:  David C Miller; Zaojun Ye; Cathryn Gust; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Relationship between occurrence of surgical complications and hospital finances.

Authors:  Sunil Eappen; Bennett H Lane; Barry Rosenberg; Stuart A Lipsitz; David Sadoff; Dave Matheson; William R Berry; Mark Lester; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Complications and costs after high-risk surgery: where should we focus quality improvement initiatives?

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Peter J Pronovost; John A Cowan; Pamela A Lipsett
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  2 in total

1.  Rates and predictors of readmission after minor lower extremity amputations.

Authors:  Robert J Beaulieu; Joshua C Grimm; Heather Lyu; Christopher J Abularrage; Bruce A Perler
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Structured exercise program prior to major cancer surgery improves cardiopulmonary fitness: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Grace H Huang; Hilmy Ismail; Andrew Murnane; Pascal Kim; Bernhard Riedel
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 3.359

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.