Given the heterogeneous nature of cultures, tumors, and tissues, the ability to capture, contain, and analyze single cells is important for genomics, proteomics, diagnostics, therapeutics, and surgery. Moreover, for surgical applications in small conduits in the body such as in the cardiovascular system, there is a need for tiny tools that approach the size of the single red blood cells that traverse the blood vessels and capillaries. We describe the fabrication of arrayed or untethered single cell grippers composed of biocompatible and bioresorbable silicon monoxide and silicon dioxide. The energy required to actuate these grippers is derived from the release of residual stress in 3-27 nm thick films, did not require any wires, tethers, or batteries, and resulted in folding angles over 100° with folding radii as small as 765 nm. We developed and applied a finite element model to predict these folding angles. Finally, we demonstrated the capture of live mouse fibroblast cells in an array of grippers and individual red blood cells in untethered grippers which could be released from the substrate to illustrate the potential utility for in vivo operations.
Given the heterogeneous nature of cultures, tumors, and tissues, the ability to capture, contain, and analyze single cells is important for genomics, proteomics, diagnostics, therapeutics, and surgery. Moreover, for surgical applications in small conduits in the body such as in the cardiovascular system, there is a need for tiny tools that approach the size of the single red blood cells that traverse the blood vessels and capillaries. We describe the fabrication of arrayed or untethered single cell grippers composed of biocompatible and bioresorbable silicon monoxide and silicon dioxide. The energy required to actuate these grippers is derived from the release of residual stress in 3-27 nm thick films, did not require any wires, tethers, or batteries, and resulted in folding angles over 100° with folding radii as small as 765 nm. We developed and applied a finite element model to predict these folding angles. Finally, we demonstrated the capture of live mouse fibroblast cells in an array of grippers and individual red blood cells in untethered grippers which could be released from the substrate to illustrate the potential utility for in vivo operations.
Because of the large size of
tools that are typically utilized for surgical diagnostics and biological
analyses, cellular samples are often large in size. Consequently,
the data collected from tissue biopsied samples and related assays
average over a multitude of cells. However, that average may not accurately
represent the behavior of individual cells, particularly if the cells
of interest are a small fraction of the population. Further, it can
be challenging to draw conclusions about dynamic or transient behaviors
of single cells by looking at large populations.[1−3] Tumors have
long been known to be heterogeneous populations of cells with varying
phenotypes and genotypes, proliferation rate, potential for metastasis,
and drug responsiveness, yet we are only beginning to understand how
these heterogeneities affect their progression.[4−7] Single cell analyses may be necessary
to differentiate the behavior of a cell subpopulation from the bulk
sample, particularly in the fields of cancer biology, genomics, proteomics,
stem cell biology, and hematology.[3] This
work is especially important as treatments for cancer, immune diseases,
and tissue regeneration move toward personalized medicine.[8]A wide range of techniques are available
for in vitro single cell
analysis, and each has advantages and disadvantages in terms of efficiency,
cell manipulation, imaging capability, sensitivity, and ability to
mimic or actually perform in vivo.[9,10] These methods
include flow cytometry,[9] optical traps,[11−16] microfluidic traps and devices,[2,17−26] microwells,[27,28] microtubes,[29] and 2D surface patterns.[30−34] Several miniaturized robotic devices have been created
to trap and manipulate particles and cells with precise control.[35−37] For example, Chronis et al. demonstrate the manipulation of a 10
μm cell using a wired, electrothermally actuated SU-8 gripper.[35] This device can manipulate cells with high precision,
but the electrical wires that control its actuation and its large
back-end design limit throughput and in vivo utility. Another SU-8
device, by Sakar et al., provides untethered manipulation of single
cells via magnetic forces with minimal fluid disturbance due to its
micrometer size and biocompatibility.[36] However, these devices are passive, trapping cells in a recess,
and thus they may lose their grip on a cell if moved in the wrong
direction or in all three dimensions. A significant hurdle in the
creation of active single cell devices with moving parts is the challenge
in harnessing energy at small size scales and in a highly parallel
and untethered manner.An ideal in vitro device would combine
the high throughput efficiency
of flow cytometry, the incorporation of patterned microfeatures for
biomolecular analyses, and the 3D manipulation precision of optical
tweezers. An ideal in vivo device should be composed of biocompatible
and possibly bioresorbable materials while facilitating tissue excision
or targeted capture, robust gripping, and retrieval in an autonomous
manner.[38] Here, we describe an important
step toward achieving tools that combine both of these in vitro and
in vivo capabilities for single cell studies and to potentially access
tiny conduits in the body. Our approach is inspired by previous studies
on the stress-based roll-up and self-folding of thin films and the
energy required to enable gripper motion is derived from the differential
residual stress in nanoscale bilayers.[39−64] The approach utilizes photolithography, which is a high throughput
technique capable of fabricating 500 000 to 10 million single
grippers on a 3 in. wafer or potentially over 100 million on a 12
in. wafer which is the size of wafers used currently in CMOS fabrication
facilities. Additionally, the grippers can be actuated to close around
single cells en masse, creating devices with patterns in all three
dimensions. The thickness of the films can be varied to control the
fold angle, while the sharpness of the tips could aid with the capture
and containment of cells. As compared to previously described stimuli
responsive “μ-grippers” that were used to biopsy
cell samples and porcine organs under in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo
conditions,[54,65−67] these grippers
are 30 times smaller, requiring significantly thinner hinges and different
materials to achieve a tight radius of curvature. While we previously
utilized the larger μ-grippers only in the gastrointestinal
(GI) tract, we envision that these single cell sized grippers could
be used in tighter spaces such as within the circulatory, urinogenital,
or central nervous system. In these regions, however, there are more
stringent requirements on biocompatibility and biodegradability for
these applications.[38]In light of
the more stringent biodegradability requirements and
the need for small devices, considerable thought was given to the
materials chosen for these single cell grippers. Silicon (Si) and
silicon dioxide (SiO2) react with water via hydrolysis
to form Si(OH)4[68,69] and thus dissolve into
DI water and various biofluids[68,70] as previously reported
by Hwang et al. in their work on transient electronics.[70] Additionally, electronic devices made from Si,
SiO2, and other metals were implanted subdermally into
mice with no significant inflammatory reactions and almost complete
dissolution in 3 weeks. Silicon monoxide (SiO) is a two-phase, nonhomogenous
mixture of amorphous Si and SiO2 and has been previously
paired with SiO2 to form tightly rolled tubes with microscale
radii of curvature when deposited by electron beam (e-beam) evaporation
in nanometer-scale thicknesses.[29,52,59,60,76,77] Thus, we selected these two silicon-based
oxides for our single cell grippers for their biocompatibility, bioresorbability,
and self-curling properties. We independently verified the dissolution
of SiO and SiO2 in phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS)
over a 20 day period at 37 °C. Thirty nanometer films of SiO2 dissolved at a rate of 2 nm/day at 37 °C, while SiO
dissolved more slowly at less than 1 nm/day (Figure
S1).Grippers were fabricated
with flexible, prestressed bilayer hinges,
connected to rigid segments (Figure 1a). The
prestressed bilayer was constructed from e-beam evaporated thin films
of SiO and SiO2. The rigid segments were formed from thicker
films of e-beam evaporated SiO. A stimuli-responsive hinge trigger
could be patterned or molded atop the grippers to control actuation.[54,65−67,71] These devices can either
be arrayed on a substrate for use as a single cell in vitro analytical
assay device or completely released to be used as free-floating or
untethered tools (Figure 1b–c). Detailed
thicknesses and evaporation conditions are in the Suppporting Information (Table S1).
Figure 1
Illustration of single
cell gripper fabrication and use on substrates
or as untethered tools. (a) Fabrication scheme for creating single
cell grippers. The prestressed actuator hinge is a SiO/SiO2 bilayer, while the rigid segments are made of SiO. Upon dissolution
of the sacrificial layer, the arms are released and self-actuate to
close around cells. An optional thermoresponsive trigger layer can
be molded atop the grippers. (b) Illustration of cells captured by
single cell microgrippers arrays. (c) Illustration of untethered single
cell grippers and red blood cell capture.
Illustration of single
cell gripper fabrication and use on substrates
or as untethered tools. (a) Fabrication scheme for creating single
cell grippers. The prestressed actuator hinge is a SiO/SiO2 bilayer, while the rigid segments are made of SiO. Upon dissolution
of the sacrificial layer, the arms are released and self-actuate to
close around cells. An optional thermoresponsive trigger layer can
be molded atop the grippers. (b) Illustration of cells captured by
single cell microgrippers arrays. (c) Illustration of untethered single
cell grippers and red blood cell capture.We developed several gripper variants with three or four
arms,
varying in size from 10 to 70 μm in length (tip-to-tip when
open), which is an appropriate size range to grasp a variety of individual
cells (Figure 2a). The alternating rigid frames
and flexible hinges are evident in the open grippers (Figure 2b, d). Grippers folded at angles ranging from 90°
to 115° depending on the bilayer film thickness, corresponding
to folding radii ranging from to 765 nm to 5 μm. The film thickness
could be adjusted to assemble tightly folded grippers in a range of
sizes. For example, 9 nm of SiO and 27 nm of SiO2 were
deposited to assemble the 50 μm grippers shown in Figure 2b and c, while a bilayer of 3 nm of SiO and 3 nm
of SiO2 was used to assemble the 10 μm grippers in
Figure 2d and e. Despite their small sizes,
these grippers were fabricated using photolithography on a projection
mask aligner with 500 nm resolution. Photolithography and registry
of multiple film layers became increasingly difficult as the size
of the grippers decreased for the specific tools used, leading to
a lower limit for an open tip to tip gripper size of about 10 μm.
In principle, smaller grippers could be fabricated using serial e-beam
lithography, but quantities would be limited due to the serial nature
of that technique, and the sizes would be smaller than those of single
cells thereby limiting use.
Figure 2
Optical images of single cell grippers before
and after closing.
(a) Optical image of grippers released from the substrate with open
arms prior to closing, in sizes ranging from 10 to 50 μm. (b–c)
Zoomed optical images of 50 μm grippers (b) prior to release
from the substrate and (c) closed tightly after release. (d–e)
Optical images of 10 μm grippers (d) open and (e) closed. Scale
bars are (a, b, c) 25 μm and (d, e) 10 μm. (f–g)
SEM images at different magnifications of closed single cell grippers
attached to the substrate. Scale bars are (f) 10 μm and (g)
5 μm.
Optical images of single cell grippers before
and after closing.
(a) Optical image of grippers released from the substrate with open
arms prior to closing, in sizes ranging from 10 to 50 μm. (b–c)
Zoomed optical images of 50 μm grippers (b) prior to release
from the substrate and (c) closed tightly after release. (d–e)
Optical images of 10 μm grippers (d) open and (e) closed. Scale
bars are (a, b, c) 25 μm and (d, e) 10 μm. (f–g)
SEM images at different magnifications of closed single cell grippers
attached to the substrate. Scale bars are (f) 10 μm and (g)
5 μm.The radius of curvature
of each gripper hinge is related to the
film thickness, mechanical properties of the materials, and residual
stress of each layer within the prestressed bilayer. It is noteworthy
that previous designs of μ-grippers were made from either a
chromium/copper (Cr/Cu) bilayer or a chromium/gold (Cr/Au) bilayer.[54,66,67] In those designs, the Cr layer
had significant tensile stress (∼1 GPa), while the Cu or Au
layer was relatively neutral in stress. This stress differential caused
the grippers to fold due to the shared boundary between the two layers.
These previously utilized metallic combinations, however, were unable
to curl with a radius of curvature less than about 30 μm, limiting
a multisegmented gripper device to larger than 200 μm in tip
to tip size when open. However, as we describe in this work, the SiO/SiO2 combination provided a sufficiently small radius of curvature
for single cell grippers, with radii as small as 765 nm.We
characterized the residual stress within the SiO and SiO2 films. We found the stress in both SiO and SiO2 to be
compressive, with less compressive stress as thicknesses increased
from 10 to 100 nm (Figure S2a). These stress
values varied significantly with thicknesses below 100 nm but were
consistent with the expected range of compressive stress for the deposition
conditions used.[72,73] However, a more important parameter
for SiO2 film stress was the time of exposure to room air
following deposition in an evaporation chamber. We observed an increasing
tensile component in SiO2 films over time (Figure S2b), while the stress in SiO films remained
generally constant. We attribute the change in SiO2 stress
to the absorption of water by SiO2, and the subsequent
reaction between water and dangling Si bonds that leads to a tensile
stress component that grows linearly with the logarithm of aging time.[74] By using SiO2 films to form the inside
of each concave folded hinge, we ensured that the growth of this tensile
stress component helped each hinge fold with a sufficiently small
radius of curvature.We examined the effect of preload strain
and film thickness on
the folding angle using an analytical curvature model[75] and a computational finite element analysis (FEA) simulation
(Figure 3 and Figures S3–S5). Details of the models are given in the Supporting
Information. We modeled the effect of strain on folding angle
for a 70 μm and a 10 μm gripper (Figure 3) and found that as the strain increased the folding angle
also increased which is expected. Larger mismatch strain allows the
gripper to fold more tightly. One can tune the strain by choosing
different materials and adjusting thin film deposition condition.
Film thickness is also a tunable property in gripper fabrication and
greatly affects the folding angle. We performed a thickness sensitivity
analysis by modeling the folding angle versus SiO and SiO2 film thickness for a 70 μm and a 10 μm gripper. In general,
due to larger bending stiffness, the folding angle decreases as film
thickness increases; thus for the smallest grippers, films on the
order of 3–5 nm were required. However, grippers with films
that are too thin may be too fragile for use in real biological applications.
These plots, and other detailed plots given in the Supporting Information, serve as design guides for determining
the necessary thicknesses for each layer within the prestressed bilayer
to achieve a desired folding angle.
Figure 3
Characterization of thin film stress and
gripper folding angle.
(a) Graphs depicting the effect of mismatch strain (left panel) and
SiO/SiO2 thickness (right panel) on folding angle for the
70 μm gripper. (b) Graphs depicting the effect of mismatch strain
(left panel) and SiO/SiO2 thickness (right panel) on folding
angle for the 10 μm gripper. The inset images of a folded gripper
with angle measurement in the left panels are optical microscopy images
of actual folded grippers for comparison to the modeled gripper folding.
The red star on these graphs indicates the experimentally observed
folding angle for these experimentally observed grippers. More details
of the parameters used to generate the models and graphs are in the Supporting Information.
Characterization of thin film stress and
gripper folding angle.
(a) Graphs depicting the effect of mismatch strain (left panel) and
SiO/SiO2 thickness (right panel) on folding angle for the
70 μm gripper. (b) Graphs depicting the effect of mismatch strain
(left panel) and SiO/SiO2 thickness (right panel) on folding
angle for the 10 μm gripper. The inset images of a folded gripper
with angle measurement in the left panels are optical microscopy images
of actual folded grippers for comparison to the modeled gripper folding.
The red star on these graphs indicates the experimentally observed
folding angle for these experimentally observed grippers. More details
of the parameters used to generate the models and graphs are in the Supporting Information.One application we envision for these devices is an in vitro
arrayed
analytical device that could be used to entrap many single cells for
biological assays. As these devices can be patterned in all three
dimensions and grip en masse, many individual cells can be trapped,
assayed, and imaged with a high yield. To demonstrate this application,
we fabricated 50 μm grippers that remain attached to the substrate
upon release of the arms. The arms were patterned on a Cu sacrificial
layer and were thus able to fold. The center or “base”
of the gripper was patterned directly onto the Si wafer so that it
remained attached during the release and folding process. We pipetted
live L-929mouse fibroblasts in media on top of the open grippers.
The grippers closed around individual cells after 2–6 h in
warm culture media due to the slow etching action of the ions in the
media (Figure 4). Thus, in this application,
no hinge trigger is required as cells are captured during the release
of the gripper arms from the substrate. The gripper arms closed around
each cell, and the cells remained viable as evidenced by the green
fluorescence of the cell bodies from the calcein stain of the live/dead
assay. Some grippers were empty, but when occupied, each of the grippers
contained only one cell. Our best observed yield for successfully
filled grippers was 48% for an area of approximately 75 grippers.
The concentration of cells used in the suspension significantly impacted
the yield of capture. The optimal concentration created a single layer
of well-distributed cells, wherein each gripper was touching at least
one cell. This optimal concentration varied with the size of the grippers.
The SiO/SiO2 grippers also are optically transparent and
thus are ideal for imaging the entrapped cells using optical microscopy
techniques. These grippers have slit openings at the intersection
of the arms, and consequently, nutrients, waste, and other biochemicals
can flow easily to and from the cells, yet we observed that the grippers
held all cells in place during staining and imaging. We performed
a live/dead assay by staining with calcein AM and ethidium homodimer
after the cells were captured (Figure 4a–c).
The cells fluoresced green, demonstrating that they are alive, and
that the assay chemicals successfully diffused between the grippers
arms. Thus, the grippers did not kill the cells, and they allow the
cells access to any chemicals within the media.
Figure 4
Single cell microgripper
arrays. (a–c) Individual cells
captured within the arms of grippers. Since the films are optically
transparent, cells captured by the grippers can be readily visualized
using optical microscopy. (c, inset) The cell shown is entrapped by
a gripper, as evidenced by the square appearance of the cell when
viewed from the top, which matches the square shape of the base of
the gripper. (d) SEM image of a cell trapped within the arms of a
gripper, surrounded by untrapped cells. Scale bars are 10 μm.
Single cell microgripper
arrays. (a–c) Individual cells
captured within the arms of grippers. Since the films are optically
transparent, cells captured by the grippers can be readily visualized
using optical microscopy. (c, inset) The cell shown is entrapped by
a gripper, as evidenced by the square appearance of the cell when
viewed from the top, which matches the square shape of the base of
the gripper. (d) SEM image of a cell trapped within the arms of a
gripper, surrounded by untrapped cells. Scale bars are 10 μm.To verify that the cells were
in fact contained inside the grippers,
we fixed the cells and performed scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
on an array of grippers with isolated fixed cells (Figure 4d). This image confirms that the cell was contained
within the arms of the gripper, as opposed to floating on top of the
gripper. It is noteworthy that the cells conformed to the shape of
the gripper, as evidenced both in the SEM and by the square shape
of the green fluorescing cells (Figure 4c inset, 4d), highlighting potential interactions with the
faces of the gripper.We also investigated applicability of
grippers to capture red blood
cells from a beagle blood sample (Figure 5).
While the previous experiment captured L-929 fibroblasts and remained
anchored to the substrate for further analysis, here we release the
grippers from the substrate to show the potential for cells to be
captured and moved in solution. We chose a 35 μm open gripper
size which is about 4–5 times the size of the red blood cells
(6–8 μm in size). The central palm of these grippers
is matched to the size of the red blood cells ensuring that the cells
could be entrapped within the gripper in a snug fit. Initially, red
blood cells were pipetted onto partially released grippers. Many grippers
were able to trap single blood cells within their arms. Optical profilometry
and microscopy of the grippers confirmed that the cells were trapped
within the grippers. This experiment highlights the potential for
these devices as in vivo cell capture tools. This application would
require a biocompatible, thermo- or chemo-responsive hinge trigger,
as previously demonstrated on larger grippers.[54,65−67,71] Whereas these larger
grippers were able to capture large clumps of tissue in vivo, the
single cell grippers could potentially enable the capture of individual
cells.
Figure 5
Capture of single red blood cells and untethered single cell grippers.
(a–c) Optical images of red blood cells trapped in 35 μm
SiO/SiO2 grippers. (a) Grippers with red blood cells prior
to folding and release from the substrate. Scale bar is 35 μm.
(b–c) Red blood cells captured by the grippers. Scale bars
are 10 μm.
Capture of single red blood cells and untethered single cell grippers.
(a–c) Optical images of red blood cells trapped in 35 μm
SiO/SiO2 grippers. (a) Grippers with red blood cells prior
to folding and release from the substrate. Scale bar is 35 μm.
(b–c) Red blood cells captured by the grippers. Scale bars
are 10 μm.We noted previously that
both SiO and SiO2 dissolve
over time in biological fluids; therefore, grippers composed of such
materials have significant potential for both in vitro and in vivo
applications. Since the dissolution rate of these materials in bodily
fluids is known to be dependent on a number of parameters such as
method of thin film deposition, thickness, pH, and volume of fluid,
further studies will be needed to design and optimize bioresorbability
and safety for specific surgical applications in different biological
environments in vivo.[78,79] For example, given the faster
rate of dissolution of SiO2 in PBS, grippers designed for
in vivo use could be fabricated with SiO2 rigid segments
for rapid elimination from the body. Grippers fabricated with SiO
rigid segments, like those shown in these figures, are best suited
to in vitro applications for biocompatibility and slow degradation.
If needed, such tools could also be created with magnetic elements
using highly stressed bilayers of nickel (Ni) with rigid Ni panels
for guidance through narrow conduits using magnetic fields (Figure S6). As an additional form of motion control,
patterned biomarkers on the grippers could enable targeting of specific
diseased cells in vivo.In summary, we have designed and fabricated
grippers capable of
capturing and isolating single cells. These single cell grippers,
made from biocompatible, optically transparent materials, can be arrayed
for high throughput in vitro assays and imaging or released for use
as untethered tools. We employed varying sizes of these grippers to
capture individual fibroblasts and red blood cells. These cells were
alive and could be assayed or fixed for imaging. Because these devices
are fabricated in 2D and subsequently folded into 3D, future studies
could explore patterned topography such as spikes, holes, nanoscale
roughness, and biochemical surface functionalizations in specific
designs onto one or more device walls. This approach could enable
multiple assays to be run at one time on a single cell. Additionally,
our group has previously demonstrated the fabrication of many differently
shaped polyhedra.[51,80] Future studies could utilize
pyramidal grippers and other regular polyhedra to study the effect
of 3D confinement on cell growth and morphology. Our process is amenable
to other lithographic approaches such as e-beam or nanoimprint lithography
for subcellular gripping capabilities. Finally, this work highlights
the potential for the creation of untethered active single cell capture
devices. When doped with magnetic elements or made from magnetic materials
such as nickel, these devices could be guided using magnetic fields[36,54,65−67,81] and consequently used as in vitro single cell capture
devices as an alternative to laser microdissection of tissue samples.
Due to their small size, they could also be utilized as bioresorbable
surgical tools and in vivo single cell capture devices that are able
to traverse conduits within the circulatory, central nervous, and
urogenital systems.
Authors: Aaron R Wheeler; William R Throndset; Rebecca J Whelan; Andrew M Leach; Richard N Zare; Yish Hann Liao; Kevin Farrell; Ian D Manger; Antoine Daridon Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2003-07-15 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Shivendra Pandey; Margaret Ewing; Andrew Kunas; Nghi Nguyen; David H Gracias; Govind Menon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Evin Gultepe; Jatinder S Randhawa; Sachin Kadam; Sumitaka Yamanaka; Florin M Selaru; Eun J Shin; Anthony N Kalloo; David H Gracias Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Evin Gultepe; Sumitaka Yamanaka; Kate E Laflin; Sachin Kadam; Yoosun Shim; Alexandru V Olaru; Berkeley Limketkai; Mouen A Khashab; Anthony N Kalloo; David H Gracias; Florin M Selaru Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Julien E Gautrot; Britta Trappmann; Fabian Oceguera-Yanez; John Connelly; Ximin He; Fiona M Watt; Wilhelm T S Huck Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: C Pacchierotti; F Ongaro; F van den Brink; C Yoon; D Prattichizzo; D H Gracias; S Misra Journal: IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 5.083
Authors: Yimin Huang; Vincent Fitzpatrick; Nan Zheng; Ran Cheng; Heyu Huang; Chiara Ghezzi; David L Kaplan; Chen Yang Journal: Adv Healthc Mater Date: 2020-08-31 Impact factor: 9.933
Authors: Joselle M McCracken; Sheng Xu; Adina Badea; Kyung-In Jang; Zheng Yan; David J Wetzel; Kewang Nan; Qing Lin; Mengdi Han; Mikayla A Anderson; Jung Woo Lee; Zijun Wei; Matt Pharr; Renhan Wang; Jessica Su; Stanislav S Rubakhin; Jonathan V Sweedler; John A Rogers; Ralph G Nuzzo Journal: Adv Biosyst Date: 2017-07-31