Gene knockout is a widely used approach to evaluate loss-of-function phenotypes and it can be facilitated by the incorporation of a DNA cassette having a drug-selectable marker. Confirmation of the correct knockout cassette insertion is an important step in gene removal validation and has generally been performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays following a time-consuming DNA extraction step. Here, we show a rapid procedure for the identification of Trypanosoma cruzi transfectants by PCR directly from liquid culture - without prior DNA extraction. This simple approach enabled us to generate PCR amplifications from different cultures varying from 106-108 cells/mL. We also show that it is possible to combine different primer pairs in a multiplex detection reaction and even to achieve knockout confirmation with an extremely simple interpretation of a real-time PCR result. Using the "culture PCR" approach, we show for the first time that we can assess different DNA sequence combinations by PCR directly from liquid culture, saving time in several tasks for T. cruzi genotype interrogation.
Gene knockout is a widely used approach to evaluate loss-of-function phenotypes and it can be facilitated by the incorporation of a DNA cassette having a drug-selectable marker. Confirmation of the correct knockout cassette insertion is an important step in gene removal validation and has generally been performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays following a time-consuming DNA extraction step. Here, we show a rapid procedure for the identification of Trypanosoma cruzi transfectants by PCR directly from liquid culture - without prior DNA extraction. This simple approach enabled us to generate PCR amplifications from different cultures varying from 106-108 cells/mL. We also show that it is possible to combine different primer pairs in a multiplex detection reaction and even to achieve knockout confirmation with an extremely simple interpretation of a real-time PCR result. Using the "culture PCR" approach, we show for the first time that we can assess different DNA sequence combinations by PCR directly from liquid culture, saving time in several tasks for T. cruzi genotype interrogation.
The generation of null mutants for specific genes has proven invaluable for elucidating
gene function in several organisms (Bouche & Bouchez
2001, Rong & Golic 2001, Iiizumi et al. 2006, Kim et al. 2013). This approach is also known as gene knockout and can be
achieved in a relatively simple manner: insertion of a DNA cassette that has a
drug-selectable marker flanked by the coding sequence or the intergenic regions of the
target gene via homologous recombination.Gene knockout by homologous recombination is the conventional way of studying
loss-of-function phenotypes in Trypanosoma cruzi - the protozoan
parasite that causes Chagas disease - because RNA interference machinery is not
functional in this organism (da Rocha et al.
2004).Although T. cruzi homologous recombination is effective (Xu et al. 2009), it is important to verify whether
the knockout cassette is at the correct locus. Current methods for
confirmation depend on a DNA extraction step (Bernards et
al. 1981, Karlinsey et al. 1989) that
is time consuming. Although there are new, simpler alternatives to DNA extraction (Medina-Acosta & Cross 1993, Rotureau et al. 2005), a fast, easy and efficient
procedure that could enable the rapid identification of T. cruzi
transfectants directly by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis could be an
advantage for routine molecular biology studies. As described for bacteria, yeasts and
algae (Packeiser et al. 2013), colony PCR could
be the answer due to its quickness, simplicity and minimal amounts of required cells.
Likely based on this idea, dos Santos et al.
(2000) proposed a colony PCR method to screen T. cruzi
colonies that has been selected on solid medium (Mondragon et al. 1999). However, although there are some advantages to
growing transformants as colonies on agarose plates (Goldberg & Chiari 1980, Wittner et al.
1982), liquid culture and limited dilution remain the preferred method.All of this knowledge prompted us to develop a rapid approach for the genotype
identification of T. cruzi transfectants by PCR directly from liquid
culture. Thus, we describe here a method to obtain DNA samples for PCR analysis directly
from liquid culture, essentially consisting of four simple steps: aliquoting up to 50 µL
of the T. cruzi transfectant culture together with the same volume of
ultra pure water in a microtube, denaturing this mixture at 98ºC for 15 min, separating
the cellular debris in a 1-min centrifugation step at top speed and using the nucleic
acid-containing supernatant on the same day in PCR reactions.In our very first attempt, we tested for amplification of the hygromycin resistance gene
(Hyg) (1,037 bp) and an internal TcNUP-1 fragment (Nup1) (1,747 bp) in a T.
cruzi transformant culture, demonstrating that is possible to PCR amplify
DNA sequences directly from liquid cell culture (Fig.
1A). Next, we showed that it is also possible to verify the correct
recombination of both selection marker cassettes in only one reaction using multiplex
PCR (Fig. 1B).
Fig. 1
: validating the “culture-polymerase chain reaction” (PCR) approach. A:
hygromycin resistance gene (Hyg) (1,037 bp) and a fragment of the TcNUP-1
gene (Nup1) (1,747 bp) were successfully amplified by PCR from a
transformant Trypanosoma cruzi culture; B: correct knockout
cassette insertion was confirmed in a transformant T. cruzi
culture by a multiplex PCR (ResF-ExtR) (1,990 and 1,758 bp) using both gene
resistance forward primers (HygF and NeoF) and a reverse primer external to
the cassette insertion (extR). PCR reactions were performed according
standard protocols using 1 µL of DNA sample obtained as described earlier.
M: 1 kb Plus DNA Ladder (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA).
Then, to verify whether our proposed method works despite the cell concentration of
T. cruzi cultures, we tested seven concentrations, ranging from
106-108 cells/mL, of the knocked out cultures for hygromycin
and neomycin amplification (Fig. 2). Of note, we
also obtained good amplifications from three-10-day-old cultures as well as from
cultures that had been stored at 4ºC for a week (data not shown).
Fig. 2
: obtaining DNA amplification from 106-108 cells/mL cultures. A:
hygromycin resistance gene (1,037 bp) was successfully amplified from 1.2 x
108 (1), 6 x 107 (2), 3 x 107 (3), 1.5 x 107 (4), 7.5 x 106 (5), 3.8 x 106
(6) and 1.9 x 106 (7) cells/mL transformant Trypanosoma
cruzi cultures; B: neomycin resistance gene (805 bp) was
successfully amplified from 6 x 107 (1), 3 x 107 (2), 1.5 x 107 (3), 7.5 x
106 (4), 3.8 x 106 (5), 1.9 x 106 (6) and 9 x 105 (7) cells/mL transformant
T. cruzi cultures. No template control (NTC) (water
instead sample DNA) was included as negative control to confirm that primers
had no DNA contaminations. Polymerase chain reactions were performed
according standard protocols using 1 µl of DNA sample obtained as described
earlier. M: 1 kb Plus DNA Ladder (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY,
USA).
Although the proposed approach for knockout confirmation is better than what is available
to date, gel electrophoresis results are required for visualisation. As an alternative
method to investigate a large number of cultures with no gel needed, we propose a simple
analysis using real-time PCR.In the first test, we did not observe good amplification signals using samples prepared
as if they were to be used for conventional PCR (data not shown). Assuming that this
test failed because PCR inhibitors are present in the liver infusion tryptose culture
medium and real-time PCR is more sensitive to them, we decided to evaluate whether
dilutions of the samples could reduce inhibitors, enabling correct amplifications.
Indeed, compared with the results obtained for genomic DNA, we conclude that the samples
must be diluted to avoid reaction inhibition by the culture medium components.
Furthermore, we propose that a 1:200 dilution should be used for real-time PCR reactions
(instead of the 1:1 dilution for conventional PCR) because it was the best result, with
a smaller cycle threshold (Ct) deviation (Supplementary data). Thus,
requiring no standard curve and using only the Ct information, we were able to
corroborate the use of real-time PCR results for the determination of knockout cassette
insertion in the cultures of different transformants (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
: confirming knockout cassette insertion at the right
locus by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Graphic representation of cycle threshold (Ct) number obtained after
real-time PCR reaction allowing genotype comparison since all tested samples
were obtained from roughly 2 x 107 cells/mL cultures. As expected,
amplification of 40S ribosomal protein S4 (S4 control), triosephosphate
isomerase (TI control) and histone H2AZ (H2AZ control) genes was about the
same in wild type (WT) and all seven different transformant
Trypanosoma cruzi cultures. Hygromycin knockout
cassette was inserted at the right locus since samples from
transformant population cultures were positives when amplified using a
forward primer internal to the construction (IR2intF) and a reverse primer
external to the cassette insertion (extR). No template control (data not
shown) was included as negative control. Real-time PCR reactions were
performed according standard protocols using 2 µL of DNA sample obtained as
described earlier.
We describe herein a powerful approach because it can be utilised in the confirmation of
plasmid presence for ectopic expression assays in addition to being used in cassette
insertion verification for knockout assays. Moreover, this method could be used to
quickly distinguish between T. cruzi cultures of different genotypes or
even between different strains (Liarte et al.
2009).In fact, the major advance proposed here is a very simple method that enables one to
obtain - quickly and precisely - answers to questions regarding DNA directly from liquid
cultures, without the need for previously extracted DNA. That is, we demonstrate the
feasibility of a valuable tool that saves bench time for several T.
cruzi genotype investigations.
Authors: Bruno A A Romagnoli; Fabiola B Holetz; Lysangela R Alves; Samuel Goldenberg Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 5.293