Lyndsay E Somerville1, Kevin Willits2, Andrew M Johnson3, Robert Litchfield2, Marie-Eve LeBel2, Jaydeep Moro4, Dianne Bryant5. 1. Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada lyndsay.somerville@lhsc.on.ca. 2. Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. 3. School of Health Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 5. Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain and disability pose a diagnostic challenge for clinicians owing to the numerous causes that exist. Unfortunately, the evidence in support of most clinical tests is weak or absent. PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic validity of physical examination maneuvers for rotator cuff lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: Consecutive shoulder patients recruited for this study were referred to 2 tertiary orthopaedic clinics. A surgeon took a thorough history and indicated his or her certainty about each possible diagnosis. A clinician performed the physical examination for diagnoses where uncertainty remained. Arthroscopy was considered the reference standard for patients who underwent surgery, and MRI with arthrogram was considered the reference for patients who did not. The sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated to investigate whether combinations of the top tests provided stronger predictions of the presence or absence of disease. RESULTS: There were 139 participants. None of the tests were highly sensitive for diagnosing rotator cuff tears or tendinosis. Tests for subscapularis tears were all highly specific. No optimal combination of tests improved the ability to correctly diagnose rotator cuff tears. Closer analysis revealed the internal rotation and lateral rotation lag sign did not improve the ability to diagnose subscapularis or supraspinatus tears, respectively, although the lateral rotation lag sign demonstrated a discriminatory ability for tear size. CONCLUSION: No test in isolation is sufficient to diagnose a patient with rotator cuff damage. A combination of tests improves the ability to diagnose damage to the rotator cuff. It is recommended that the internal rotation and lateral rotation lag signs be removed from the gamut of physical examination tests for supraspinatus and subscapularis tears.
BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain and disability pose a diagnostic challenge for clinicians owing to the numerous causes that exist. Unfortunately, the evidence in support of most clinical tests is weak or absent. PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic validity of physical examination maneuvers for rotator cuff lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: Consecutive shoulder patients recruited for this study were referred to 2 tertiary orthopaedic clinics. A surgeon took a thorough history and indicated his or her certainty about each possible diagnosis. A clinician performed the physical examination for diagnoses where uncertainty remained. Arthroscopy was considered the reference standard for patients who underwent surgery, and MRI with arthrogram was considered the reference for patients who did not. The sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated to investigate whether combinations of the top tests provided stronger predictions of the presence or absence of disease. RESULTS: There were 139 participants. None of the tests were highly sensitive for diagnosing rotator cuff tears or tendinosis. Tests for subscapularis tears were all highly specific. No optimal combination of tests improved the ability to correctly diagnose rotator cuff tears. Closer analysis revealed the internal rotation and lateral rotation lag sign did not improve the ability to diagnose subscapularis or supraspinatus tears, respectively, although the lateral rotation lag sign demonstrated a discriminatory ability for tear size. CONCLUSION: No test in isolation is sufficient to diagnose a patient with rotator cuff damage. A combination of tests improves the ability to diagnose damage to the rotator cuff. It is recommended that the internal rotation and lateral rotation lag signs be removed from the gamut of physical examination tests for supraspinatus and subscapularis tears.
Authors: Andrew Dakkak; Michael K Krill; Matthew L Krill; Benedict Nwachukwu; Frank McCormick Journal: Sports Health Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 3.843
Authors: Lyndsay E Somerville; Kevin Willits; Andrew M Johnson; Robert Litchfield; Marie-Eve LeBel; Jaydeep Moro; Dianne Bryant Journal: Surg J (N Y) Date: 2017-04-24
Authors: Breda H Eubank; Nicholas G Mohtadi; Mark R Lafave; J Preston Wiley; Aaron J Bois; Richard S Boorman; David M Sheps Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 4.615