The mainstay of comparative research for epilepsy has been rodent models of induced epilepsy. This rodent basic science is essential, but it does not always translate to similar results in people, likely because induced epilepsy is not always similar enough to naturally occurring epilepsy. A good large animal, intermediate model would be very helpful to potentially bridge this translational gap. Epilepsy is the most common medical neurologic disease of dogs. It has been proposed since the 1970s that dogs with naturally occurring epilepsy could potentially be used as a comparative model for people of the underlying basis and therapy of epilepsy. There have been sporadic studies in the decades since then, with a relative surge in the last 10 years. These canine studies in the areas of genetics, drug therapy, dietary therapy, electroencelphalogram research, and devices for epilepsy show proof of concept that canine epilepsy can be a very good model for comparative research for many, but not all, facets of epilepsy. Results of research in canine epilepsy can and have benefited the improvement of treatment for both people and dogs.
The mainstay of comparative research for epilepsy has been rodent models of induced epilepsy. This rodent basic science is essential, but it does not always translate to similar results in people, likely because induced epilepsy is not always similar enough to naturally occurring epilepsy. A good large animal, intermediate model would be very helpful to potentially bridge this translational gap. Epilepsy is the most common medical neurologic disease of dogs. It has been proposed since the 1970s that dogs with naturally occurring epilepsy could potentially be used as a comparative model for people of the underlying basis and therapy of epilepsy. There have been sporadic studies in the decades since then, with a relative surge in the last 10 years. These canine studies in the areas of genetics, drug therapy, dietary therapy, electroencelphalogram research, and devices for epilepsy show proof of concept that canineepilepsy can be a very good model for comparative research for many, but not all, facets of epilepsy. Results of research in canineepilepsy can and have benefited the improvement of treatment for both people and dogs.
Authors: Edward E Patterson; Ilo E Leppik; Lisa D Coles; Michael Podell; Charles H Vite; William Bush; James C Cloyd Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Han-Tai Shiao; Vladimir Cherkassky; Jieun Lee; Brandon Veber; Edward E Patterson; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Gregory A Worrell Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Mario Van Poucke; Kimberley Stee; Sofie F M Bhatti; An Vanhaesebrouck; Leslie Bosseler; Luc J Peelman; Luc Van Ham Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2016-12-14 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Francisco Javier Muñoz-Almaraz; Francisco Zamora-Martínez; Paloma Botella-Rocamora; Juan Pardo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Benjamin H Brinkmann; Edward E Patterson; Charles Vite; Vincent M Vasoli; Daniel Crepeau; Matt Stead; J Jeffry Howbert; Vladimir Cherkassky; Joost B Wagenaar; Brian Litt; Gregory A Worrell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Adriano Wang-Leandro; Marc K Hobert; Sabine Kramer; Karl Rohn; Veronika M Stein; Andrea Tipold Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Benjamin H Brinkmann; Joost Wagenaar; Drew Abbot; Phillip Adkins; Simone C Bosshard; Min Chen; Quang M Tieng; Jialune He; F J Muñoz-Almaraz; Paloma Botella-Rocamora; Juan Pardo; Francisco Zamora-Martinez; Michael Hills; Wei Wu; Iryna Korshunova; Will Cukierski; Charles Vite; Edward E Patterson; Brian Litt; Gregory A Worrell Journal: Brain Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 15.255