| Literature DB >> 30223849 |
Adriano Wang-Leandro1,2,3, Marc K Hobert4, Sabine Kramer4, Karl Rohn5, Veronika M Stein4,6, Andrea Tipold4,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) results in sensory and motor function impairment and may cause a substantial social and economic burden. For the implementation of novel treatment strategies, parallel development of objective tools evaluating spinal cord (SC) integrity during motor function recovery (MFR) is needed. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) enables in vivo microstructural assessment of SCI.Entities:
Keywords: Canine; DTI; Follow-up studies; Hemilaminectomy; IVDH; Intervertebral disc herniation; MRI; SCI; Translational medicine
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30223849 PMCID: PMC6142343 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-018-1630-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Fig. 1Flow chart illustrating the study design. DTI Diffusion tensor imaging, MFR motor function recovery, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, SC spinal cord, SCI spinal cord injury
Fig. 2Selection of regions of interest. Sagittal and transverse T2W images and transverse colour-coded FA maps of the spinal cord of a 17.7 kg mix-breed male dog, 6.6 years-old, with acute onset of paraplegia due to an intervertebral disc herniation (IVDH) at the level of L1–2 before (a) and 12 weeks after decompressive surgery (b). The red arrow points at the epicentre of lesion in sagittal T2W images. The star in A shows the degenerated disc material compressing the SC. The white arrow in B shows the hemilaminectomy defect performed to achieve SC decompression. Colour coding of FA maps: blue depicts craniocaudal diffusion axis, green and red indicate ventrodorsal and laterolateral diffusion axis, respectively
SCI dog characteristics
| Clinical grade | At presentation (n = 17) | At follow-up examination (n = 16) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | – | 4 |
| 1 | – | – |
| 2 | – | 11 |
| 3 | – | 1 |
| 4 | 12 | – |
| 5 | 5 | – |
SCI spinal cord injury; clinical grading. 0: dog with no neurological deficits; 1: hyperaesthesia with paravertebral palpation; 2: ambulatory paraparesis; 3: non-ambulatory paraparesis; 4: paraplegia with deep pain perception; 5: paraplegia without deep pain perception
Fig. 3Distribution of FA values. Tukey boxplots depicting the distribution of fractional anisotropy (FA) values at each localization before (a) and 12 weeks after showing motor function recovery (b). Values at epicentres showed significant increases compared to controls and perilesional values measured caudal to the epicentre. No differences were found in the follow-up MRI examination
Temporal evolvement of DTI metrics after spinal cord decompression
| Diffusion metrics | SC segment | At presentation (n = 17) | Follow-up (n = 16) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA; median ± SD | Cranial | 0.725 (± 0.105) | 0.627 (± 0.075) |
|
| Epicentres | 0.781 (± 0.053) | 0.611 (± 0.092) |
| |
| Caudal | 0.678 (± 0.087) | 0.604 (± 0.074) |
| |
| ADC (10−3mm2/s); median ± SD | Cranial | 0.999 (± 0.317) | 1.224 (± 0.575) |
|
| Epicentres | 0.817 (± 0.236) | 1.134 (± 0.366) |
| |
| Caudal | 0.985 (± 0.197) | 1.198 (± 0.507) | 0.0646 |
Italic values indicate significance of p value (p < 0.05)
Epicentres: ROIs placed in spinal cord compressed by herniated nucleus pulposus material, directly above the respective intervertebral disc space. Cranially: ROIs placed in spinal cord one vertebral body cranially to epicentres. Caudally: ROIs placed in spinal cord one vertebral body caudal to epicentres
DTI diffusion tensor imaging, FA fractional anisotropy, ADC apparent diffusion coefficient, SD standard deviation, SC spinal cord
Fig. 4Distribution of ADC values. Tukey boxplots depicting the distribution of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values at each localization before decompressive surgery (a) and at follow-up scan 12 weeks after MFR (b). Before decompressive surgery, values gathered from the epicentre were significantly lower than that of controls. Epicentres displayed lower values than values cranially and caudally. At follow-up scans, ADC values from dogs with MFR did not differ from controls