Literature DB >> 24935873

Do nurses have worse pregnancy outcomes than non-nurses?

Hui-Ju Yang1, Feng-Yu Kao, Yiing-Jeng Chou, Nicole Huang, Kuang-Yi Chang, Li-Yin Chien.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nurses encounter multiple occupational exposures at work which may harm their reproductive health. The purpose of the study was to compare pregnancy complications and outcomes including cesarean deliveries, tocolysis, miscarriage, and preterm labor between female nurses and comparable women who were not nurses in Taiwan.
METHODS: This nationwide population-based study was performed using the National Health Insurance Research Database from 1997 to 2008. We identified 3,656 pregnancies among 2,326 nurses and 111,889 pregnancies among 74,919 non-nurses. A generalized estimating equation was used to compare risks between the two groups.
RESULTS: The rates of tocolysis (28.6 vs 22.3%), miscarriage (6.0 vs 5.3%), and preterm labor (8.1 vs 4.4%) were significantly higher among nurses than non-nurses. After adjustment for background differences, nurses had significantly higher risks for cesarean section (adjusted OR 1.12 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.22]), tocolysis (OR 1.18 [95% CI 1.09-1.29]), and preterm labor (OR 1.46 [95% CI 1.28-1.67]) than non-nurses.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurses are at higher risk for cesarean section, tocolysis, and preterm labor than non-nurses. Occupational exposure related to these adverse pregnancy outcomes should be examined. Strategies to decrease the risks should be developed to improve reproductive health among nurses.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean section; nurse; occupational health; pregnancy complications; pregnancy outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24935873     DOI: 10.1111/birt.12118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  7 in total

1.  Adverse pregnancy outcomes in healthcare workers: a Korean nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Chulyong Park; Mo-Yeol Kang; Dohyung Kim; Jaechan Park; Huisu Eom; Eun-A Kim
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Occupation and maternal mortality in Brazil.

Authors:  Ana Isabela Feitosa-Assis; Vilma Sousa Santana
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.106

3.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Nurses' Clinical Work Experience during Pregnancy.

Authors:  Hyunjung Lee; Hyoung Eun Chang; Jiyeon Ha
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-24

Review 5.  Ergonomic Stressors Among Pregnant Healthcare Workers: Impact on pregnancy outcomes and recommended safety practices.

Authors:  Frincy Francis; Sheeba E Johnsunderraj; K Y Divya; Divya Raghavan; Atiya Al-Furgani; Lily P Bera; Aniamma Abraham
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2021-06-21

6.  Prevalence of abortion and adverse pregnancy outcomes among working women in Korea: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Chulyong Park; Mo-Yeol Kang; Dohyung Kim; Jaechan Park; Huisu Eom; Eun-A Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of long working hours and shift work during pregnancy on obstetric and perinatal outcomes: A large prospective cohort study-Japan Environment and Children's Study.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Suzumori; Takeshi Ebara; Taro Matsuki; Yasuyuki Yamada; Sayaka Kato; Toyonori Omori; Shinji Saitoh; Michihiro Kamijima; Mayumi Sugiura-Ogasawara
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.689

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.