Literature DB >> 24935784

The estimation of calibration equations for variables with heteroscedastic measurement errors.

Lu Tian1, Ramón A Durazo-Arvizu, Gary Myers, Steve Brooks, Kurtis Sarafin, Christopher T Sempos.   

Abstract

In clinical chemistry and medical research, there is often a need to calibrate the values obtained from an old or discontinued laboratory procedure to the values obtained from a new or currently used laboratory method. The objective of the calibration study is to identify a transformation that can be used to convert the test values of one laboratory measurement procedure into the values that would be obtained using another measurement procedure. However, in the presence of heteroscedastic measurement error, there is no good statistical method available for estimating the transformation. In this paper, we propose a set of statistical methods for a calibration study when the magnitude of the measurement error is proportional to the underlying true level. The corresponding sample size estimation method for conducting a calibration study is discussed as well. The proposed new method is theoretically justified and evaluated for its finite sample properties via an extensive numerical study. Two examples based on real data are used to illustrate the procedure.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  calibration study; coefficient of variation (CV); heteroscedastic measurement error and estimating equations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24935784     DOI: 10.1002/sim.6235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  8 in total

1.  Standardizing 25-hydroxyvitamin D values from the Canadian Health Measures Survey.

Authors:  Kurtis Sarafin; Ramón Durazo-Arvizu; Lu Tian; Karen W Phinney; Susan Tai; Johanna E Camara; Joyce Merkel; Evan Green; Christopher T Sempos; Stephen P J Brooks
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Evaluation of Vitamin D Standardization Program protocols for standardizing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D data: a case study of the program's potential for national nutrition and health surveys.

Authors:  Kevin D Cashman; Mairead Kiely; Michael Kinsella; Ramón A Durazo-Arvizu; Lu Tian; Yue Zhang; Alice Lucey; Albert Flynn; Michael J Gibney; Hubert W Vesper; Karen W Phinney; Paul M Coates; Mary F Picciano; Christopher T Sempos
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Multiple imputation to evaluate the impact of an assay change in national surveys.

Authors:  Maya Sternberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-04-16       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Vitamin D deficiency in Europe: pandemic?

Authors:  Kevin D Cashman; Kirsten G Dowling; Zuzana Škrabáková; Marcela Gonzalez-Gross; Jara Valtueña; Stefaan De Henauw; Luis Moreno; Camilla T Damsgaard; Kim F Michaelsen; Christian Mølgaard; Rolf Jorde; Guri Grimnes; George Moschonis; Christina Mavrogianni; Yannis Manios; Michael Thamm; Gert Bm Mensink; Martina Rabenberg; Markus A Busch; Lorna Cox; Sarah Meadows; Gail Goldberg; Ann Prentice; Jacqueline M Dekker; Giel Nijpels; Stefan Pilz; Karin M Swart; Natasja M van Schoor; Paul Lips; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Vilmundur Gudnason; Mary Frances Cotch; Seppo Koskinen; Christel Lamberg-Allardt; Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu; Christopher T Sempos; Mairead Kiely
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Implications of standardization of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D data for the evaluation of vitamin D status in Germany, including a temporal analysis.

Authors:  Martina Rabenberg; Christa Scheidt-Nave; Markus A Busch; Michael Thamm; Nina Rieckmann; Ramón A Durazo-Arvizu; Kirsten G Dowling; Zuzana Škrabáková; Kevin D Cashman; Christopher T Sempos; Gert B M Mensink
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Adjusting Coronavirus Prevalence Estimates for Laboratory Test Kit Error.

Authors:  Christopher T Sempos; Lu Tian
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 7.  Vitamin D: Current Challenges between the Laboratory and Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ludmila Máčová; Marie Bičíková
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Reflection on modern methods: five myths about measurement error in epidemiological research.

Authors:  Maarten van Smeden; Timothy L Lash; Rolf H H Groenwold
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 7.196

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.