Literature DB >> 24935474

The diagnostic value of serum hybrid capture 2 (CH2) HPV DNA in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Duo Yin1, Yan Jiang, Ning Wang, Ling Ouyang, Yanming Lu, Yao Zhang, Heng Wei, Shulan Zhang.   

Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of cervical cancer remains a clinical challenge, and a number of studies have used the serum hybrid capture 2 (HC2) human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in the diagnosis of cervical cancer. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to determine the overall accuracy of HC2 HPV DNA in the diagnosis of cervical cancer. A systematic review of studies from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database-disc, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Technology of Chongqing (VIP), and Wan Fang database was conducted, and the data concerning the accuracy of HC2 HPV DNA in the diagnosis of cervical cancer were pooled. The methodological quality of each study was assessed by quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy (QUADAS). Statistical analysis was performed by employing Meta-DiSc (version 1.4) and Stata (version 12.0) software. The overall test performance was summarized using receiver operating characteristic curves. Finally, 12 studies, including 12,492 subjects, met the inclusion criteria and then included in this present meta-analysis. The summary estimates for serum HC2 HPV DNA in the diagnosis of cervical cancer were as follows: sensitivity 0.83 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.85), specificity 0.71 (95 % CI 0.69-0.72), positive likelihood ratio 3.65 (95 % CI 1.77-7.54), negative likelihood ratio 0.32 (95 % CI 0.21-0.48), and diagnostic odds ratio 10.54 (95 % CI 4.95-22.46), and the area under the curve was 0.8922. Our findings suggest that HC2 HPV DNA may improve the accuracy of cervical cancer diagnosis, while the results of HC2 HPV DNA assays should be interpreted in parallel with conventional test results and other clinical findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24935474     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2214-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  17 in total

1.  Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Jeroen G Lijmer; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Siem H Heisterkamp
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson; Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

3.  Meta-analysis of genetic association studies.

Authors:  Marcus R Munafò; Jonathan Flint
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance.

Authors:  Afina S Glas; Jeroen G Lijmer; Martin H Prins; Gouke J Bonsel; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Commercially available assays for multiplex detection of alpha human papillomaviruses.

Authors:  Mario Poljak; Boštjan J Kocjan
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Joël Coste; Béatrix Cochand-Priollet; Patricia de Cremoux; Catherine Le Galès; Isabelle Cartier; Vincent Molinié; Sylvain Labbé; Marie-Cécile Vacher-Lavenu; Philippe Vielh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-05

Review 7.  Management of cervical precancers: a global perspective.

Authors:  Daniel Echelman; Sarah Feldman
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.722

8.  Cross-sectional study of patient- and physician-collected cervical cytology and human papillomavirus.

Authors:  Francisco Garcia; Bel Barker; Carlos Santos; Elena Mendez Brown; Thomas Nuño; Anna Giuliano; John Davis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Assessment of cumulative evidence on genetic associations: interim guidelines.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Paolo Boffetta; Julian Little; Thomas R O'Brien; Andre G Uitterlinden; Paolo Vineis; David J Balding; Anand Chokkalingam; Siobhan M Dolan; W Dana Flanders; Julian P T Higgins; Mark I McCarthy; David H McDermott; Grier P Page; Timothy R Rebbeck; Daniela Seminara; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines.

Authors:  Walter L Devillé; Frank Buntinx; Lex M Bouter; Victor M Montori; Henrica C W de Vet; Danielle A W M van der Windt; P Dick Bezemer
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2002-07-03       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The diagnostic accuracy of HE4 in lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daye Cheng; Ying Sun; Hu He
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.434

2.  Cervical Cancer and Genital Infections: Assessment of Performance and Validation in Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Assays in Iran, its Neighbouring Countries and Persian Gulf Area.

Authors:  Amir Sohrabi; Masoud Hajia
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2017-01-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.