Literature DB >> 2493540

[Nutritional status in esophageal cancer: assessment and significance for preoperative risk assessment].

W Brandmair1, L Lehr, J R Siewert.   

Abstract

In a prospective study including 60 patients with esophageal carcinoma the nutritional status was evaluated by means of anthropometric, biochemical and immunological data. As a first measure of malnutrition the diminuation of each single parameter was estimated in a 10%-scale, according to this a linear rising number of points given and the sum for all 11 parameters expressed as a score (Gofferje and Fekl). Second the nutritional status was judged by the prognostic nutritional index (Buzby and Mullen). Both score and index were correlated with serious postoperative complications (wound infection, anastomotic leakage, sepsis, organ failure, death). The results show that it was not possible to assess the risk of esophagectomy preoperatively on the ground of nutritional parameters solely. The reason could be that the nutritional status was rather normal in most cases and its risk burden therefore low. In conclusion performing preoperative nutritional therapy routinely seems not to be justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2493540     DOI: 10.1007/bf01261932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir        ISSN: 0023-8236


  19 in total

1.  Percentage of weight loss: a basic indicator of surgical risk in patients with chronic peptic ulcer. 1936.

Authors:  H O Studley
Journal:  Nutr Hosp       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.057

2.  Doubled fourth-day colorectal anastomotic strength with complete retention of intestinal mature wound collagen and accelerated deposition following immediate full enteral nutrition.

Authors:  A Greenstein; P Rogers; G Moss
Journal:  Surg Forum       Date:  1978

3.  A modified prognostic index based upon nutritional measurements.

Authors:  J M Simms; J A Smith; H F Woods
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 7.324

4.  A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds.

Authors:  P J Cruse; R Foord
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1973-08

5.  Prediction of operative morbidity and mortality by preoperative nutritional assessment.

Authors:  J L Mullen; G P Buzby; M T Waldman; M H Gertner; C L Hobbs; E F Rosato
Journal:  Surg Forum       Date:  1979

6.  Collagen metabolism in granulating wounds.

Authors:  H D Stein; H R Keiser
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  The effects of total parenteral nutrition on immunodepression due to malnutrition.

Authors:  R Dionigi; L Dominioni; F Gnes; A Ballabio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A comparison of the predictive value of nutritional assessment techniques.

Authors:  J P Baker; A S Detsky; J Whitwell; B Langer; K N Jeejeebhoy
Journal:  Hum Nutr Clin Nutr       Date:  1982

9.  Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  G P Buzby; J L Mullen; D C Matthews; C L Hobbs; E F Rosato
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Parenteral hyperalimentation and wound healing.

Authors:  F Bozzetti; G Terno; C Longoni
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1975-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  [Significance of preoperative weight loss for perioperative metabolic adaptation and surgical risk in patients with tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  A Weimann; H J Meyer; M J Müller; P Stenkhoff; J Miholic; J Jähne; O Selberg; R Pichlmayr
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1992

2.  Risk analysis in resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  S Y Law; M Fok; J Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.