Literature DB >> 24935284

Glaucoma diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography parameters in early glaucoma with different types of optic disc damage.

Hye-Young Shin1, Hae-Young Lopilly Park2, Younhea Jung2, Jin-A Choi3, Chan Kee Park4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the initial visual field (VF) defect pattern and the spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters and investigate the effects of distinct types of optic disc damage on the diagnostic performance of these OCT parameters in early glaucoma.
DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 138 control eyes and 160 eyes with early glaucoma were enrolled. The glaucomatous eyes were subdivided into 4 groups according to the type of optic disc damage: focal ischemic (FI) group, myopic (MY) group, senile sclerotic (SS) group, and generalized enlargement (GE) group.
METHODS: The values of total deviation (TD) maps were analyzed, and superior-inferior (S-I) differences of TD were calculated. The optic nerve head (ONH) parameters, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL), and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thicknesses were measured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of diagnostic ability using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs).
RESULTS: The S-I and central S-I difference of the FI group were larger than those of the GE group. The rim area of the SS group was larger than those of the 3 other groups, and the vertical cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) of the GE group was larger than that of the MY group. In addition, the minimum and inferotemporal GCIPL thicknesses of the FI group were smaller than those of the GE group. The AUC of the rim area (0.89) was lower than that of the minimum GCIPL (0.99) in the SS group, and the AUC of the vertical CDR (0.90) was lower than that of the minimum GCIPL (0.99) in the MY group. Furthermore, the AUCs of the minimum GCIPL thicknesses of the FI and MY group were greater than those of the average pRNFL thickness for detecting glaucoma, as opposed to the SS and GE.
CONCLUSIONS: The OCT parameters differed among the 4 groups on the basis of the distinct optic disc appearance and initial glaucomatous damage pattern. Clinicians should be aware that the diagnostic capability of OCT parameters could differ according to the type of optic disc damage in early glaucoma.
Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24935284     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  14 in total

1.  Characteristic correlations of the structure-function relationship in different glaucomatous disc types.

Authors:  Kazuko Omodaka; Naoko Takada; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Hidetoshi Takahashi; Makoto Araie; Toru Nakazawa
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Comparison of the current and a new RTVue OCT software version for detection of ganglion cell complex changes due to cataract surgery.

Authors:  Gábor Holló; Farzaneh Naghizadeh; Sofia Hsu; Tamás Filkorn; Mária Bausz
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Optical Coherence Tomography Segmentation Errors of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Persist Over Time.

Authors:  Nisha Nagarkatti-Gude; Stuart K Gardiner; Brad Fortune; Shaban Demirel; Steven L Mansberger
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  The relationship between contrast sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Sarah Amanullah; Joseph Okudolo; Kamran Rahmatnejad; Shuai-Chun Lin; Sheryl S Wizov; Remy S Manzi Muhire; Lisa A Hark; Cindy X Zheng; Tingting Zhan; George L Spaeth
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Automated Segmentation Errors When Using Optical Coherence Tomography to Measure Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Steven L Mansberger; Shivali A Menda; Brad A Fortune; Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Ocular characteristics associated with the location of focal lamina cribrosa defects in open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  H-Yl Park; Y S Hwang; C K Park
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Structural and Functional Evaluations for the Early Detection of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Katie A Lucy; Gadi Wollstein
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-14

8.  Differential Effects of Aging in the Macular Retinal Layers, Neuroretinal Rim, and Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer.

Authors:  Balwantray C Chauhan; Jayme R Vianna; Glen P Sharpe; Shaban Demirel; Christopher A Girkin; Christian Y Mardin; Alexander F Scheuerle; Claude F Burgoyne
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Rates of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thinning in Distinct Glaucomatous Optic Disc Phenotypes in Early Glaucoma.

Authors:  Ryan Caezar C David; Sasan Moghimi; Eren Ekici; Jiun L Do; Huiyuan Hou; James A Proudfoot; Alireza Kamalipour; Takashi Nishida; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 5.488

10.  Clinical Factors Associated with Lamina Cribrosa Thickness in Patients with Glaucoma, as Measured with Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Kazuko Omodaka; Seri Takahashi; Akiko Matsumoto; Shigeto Maekawa; Tsutomu Kikawa; Noriko Himori; Hidetoshi Takahashi; Kazuichi Maruyama; Hiroshi Kunikata; Masahiro Akiba; Toru Nakazawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.