Literature DB >> 24935195

Geographic variation in sex-chromosome differentiation in the common frog (Rana temporaria).

Nicolas Rodrigues1, Juha Merilä, Cécile Patrelle, Nicolas Perrin.   

Abstract

In sharp contrast with birds and mammals, sex-determination systems in ectothermic vertebrates are often highly dynamic and sometimes multifactorial. Both environmental and genetic effects have been documented in common frogs (Rana temporaria). One genetic linkage group, mapping to the largest pair of chromosomes and harbouring the candidate sex-determining gene Dmrt1, associates with sex in several populations throughout Europe, but association varies both within and among populations. Here, we show that sex association at this linkage group differs among populations along a 1500-km transect across Sweden. Genetic differentiation between sexes is strongest (FST  = 0.152) in a northern-boreal population, where male-specific alleles and heterozygote excesses (FIS  = -0.418 in males, +0.025 in females) testify to a male-heterogametic system and lack of X-Y recombination. In the southernmost population (nemoral climate), in contrast, sexes share the same alleles at the same frequencies (FST  = 0.007 between sexes), suggesting unrestricted recombination. Other populations show intermediate levels of sex differentiation, with males falling in two categories: some cluster with females, while others display male-specific Y haplotypes. This polymorphism may result from differences between populations in the patterns of X-Y recombination, co-option of an alternative sex-chromosome pair, or a mixed sex-determination system where maleness is controlled either by genes or by environment depending on populations or families. We propose approaches to test among these alternative models, to disentangle the effects of climate and phylogeography on the latitudinal trend, and to sort out how this polymorphism relates to the 'sexual races' described in common frogs in the 1930s.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ESD-GSD continuum; X-Y recombination; amphibian; sex determination; sex reversal

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24935195     DOI: 10.1111/mec.12829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  14 in total

1.  Sex-chromosome differentiation and 'sex races' in the common frog (Rana temporaria).

Authors:  Nicolas Rodrigues; Yvan Vuille; Jon Loman; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The genetic contribution to sex determination and number of sex chromosomes vary among populations of common frogs (Rana temporaria).

Authors:  N Rodrigues; Y Vuille; A Brelsford; J Merilä; N Perrin
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  High elevation increases the risk of Y chromosome loss in Alpine skink populations with sex reversal.

Authors:  Duminda S B Dissanayake; Clare E Holleley; Janine E Deakin; Arthur Georges
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Dmrt1 polymorphism covaries with sex-determination patterns in Rana temporaria.

Authors:  Wen-Juan Ma; Nicolas Rodrigues; Roberto Sermier; Alan Brelsford; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Sex-linked markers in the North American green frog (Rana clamitans) developed using DArTseq provide early insight into sex chromosome evolution.

Authors:  Max R Lambert; David K Skelly; Tariq Ezaz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Using conventional F-statistics to study unconventional sex-chromosome differentiation.

Authors:  Nicolas Rodrigues; Christophe Dufresnes
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Comparative High-Density Linkage Mapping Reveals Conserved Genome Structure but Variation in Levels of Heterochiasmy and Location of Recombination Cold Spots in the Common Frog.

Authors:  Gemma Palomar; Freed Ahmad; Anti Vasemägi; Chikako Matsuba; Alfredo G Nicieza; José Manuel Cano
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 8.  Sex Chromosome Evolution: So Many Exceptions to the Rules.

Authors:  Benjamin L S Furman; David C H Metzger; Iulia Darolti; Alison E Wright; Benjamin A Sandkam; Pedro Almeida; Jacelyn J Shu; Judith E Mank
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Suppressed Recombination of Sex Chromosomes Is Not Caused by Chromosomal Reciprocal Translocation in Spiny Frog (Quasipaa boulengeri).

Authors:  Xiuyun Yuan; Yun Xia; Xiaomao Zeng
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Male heterogametic sex determination in Rana dybowskii based on sex-linked molecular markers.

Authors:  Yuan Xu; Zhiheng DU; Jiayu Liu; Hang Su; Fangyong Ning; Shiquan Cui; Lijuan Wang; Jianming Liu; Chuanshuai Ren; Shengwei DI; Xiujuan Bai
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 2.083

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.