Literature DB >> 24933676

Patients surviving six months in hospice care: who are they?

Lindsay R Rothenberg1, Danielle Doberman, Lin E Simon, Jan Gryczynski, Grace Cordts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: On January 1, 2011, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) began requiring U.S. hospices to conduct a "face-to-face" (F2F) assessment of eligibility for continued hospice care with patients entering their third certification period (180 days after initial enrollment). Understanding which patient populations require F2F assessment is important for evaluating the impact of the CMS regulation and gauging the appropriateness of the 6-month prognosis criteria for different patient groups.
METHODS: Retrospective program records were obtained for patients enrolled in a large hospice 6 months prior to implementation of the CMS regulation (N=375). Patients who remained in hospice and received a F2F (n=140) were compared to patients who were no longer in hospice (n=235) on demographics, terminal condition (categorized as debility/dementia, cancer, or other), presence of serious comorbidity, length of stay, setting of care prior to admission, and hospice outcome using bivariate statistics. Predictors of F2F recertification were examined using a multivariable logistic regression model controlling for demographics, setting of care prior to admission, comorbidity, and primary terminal diagnosis.
RESULTS: At the bivariate level, patients who received an F2F were older (p<0.001), and more likely to have lived in a facility care setting prior to hospice admission (p<0.001) than their non-F2F counterparts. Findings from the logistic regression analysis indicate that initial setting of care (odds ratio [OR] for inpatient versus home=0.20; p=0.01), presence of serious comorbidity (OR=2.84; p<0.001), and primary diagnosis (OR for debility/dementia versus cancer=3.35; p<0.001) were significant predictors of F2F recertification.
CONCLUSIONS: Unlike hospice patients with cancer, patients with a primary diagnosis of dementia or debility are more likely to remain in hospice care beyond 6 months and require F2F recertification. Still, these patients need the services provided by hospice care and may be limited by the 6-month recertification criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24933676     DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  5 in total

1.  Geographic Variation of Hospice Use Patterns at the End of Life.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Melissa D Aldridge; Cary P Gross; Maureen Canavan; Emily Cherlin; Rosemary Johnson-Hurzeler; Elizabeth Bradley
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Is It the Difference a Day Makes? Bereaved Caregivers' Perceptions of Short Hospice Enrollment.

Authors:  Deborah P Waldrop; Mary Ann Meeker; Jean S Kutner
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Trends in Hospice Discharge and Relative Outcomes Among Medicare Patients in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry.

Authors:  Haider J Warraich; Haolin Xu; Adam D DeVore; Roland Matsouaka; Paul A Heidenreich; Deepak L Bhatt; Adrian F Hernandez; Clyde W Yancy; Gregg C Fonarow; Larry A Allen
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

4.  Cachexia & debility diagnoses in hospitalized children and adolescents with complex chronic conditions: evidence from the Kids' Inpatient Database.

Authors:  Bryce A Van Doren; Debosree Roy; Joshua M Noone; Christopher M Blanchette; Susan T Arthur
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2015-02-27

5.  Palliative care for nursing home patients with dementia: service evaluation and risk factors of mortality.

Authors:  Chih-Pang Chu; Cho-Yin Huang; Chian-Jue Kuo; Ying-Yeh Chen; Chun-Tse Chen; Tien-Wei Yang; Hsing-Cheng Liu
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.234

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.