Nicholas J Slater1, Harry van Goor2, Robert P Bleichrodt2. 1. Department of Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: n.slater.md@gmail.com. 2. Department of Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recurrence rates after component separation technique (CST) are low in the literature but may be underestimated because of inadequate follow-up methods. METHODS: Prospective patient follow-up was performed of consecutive patients who underwent repair of large and complex ventral hernias using CST without mesh utilization. Primary outcome was recurrent hernia determined by clinical examination at least 1 year after surgery in all living patients. Current literature underwent meta-analysis regarding outcomes and mode of follow-up. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were included with a mean age of 52.2 years and a mean defect size of 214.9 cm(2), respectively. Twenty-nine patients (38.7%) had a recurrent hernia after a mean of 40.9-month follow-up, and this was significantly higher than in the literature (14.0%, P < .01). Sixty-four percent of studies in the literature were unclear about the method of determining recurrent hernia or included telephone follow-up and questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: CST coincides with a high recurrence rate when clinical follow-up is longer than a year. Reported recurrence rates are probably underestimated because the method and duration of follow-up are inadequate.
BACKGROUND: Recurrence rates after component separation technique (CST) are low in the literature but may be underestimated because of inadequate follow-up methods. METHODS: Prospective patient follow-up was performed of consecutive patients who underwent repair of large and complex ventral hernias using CST without mesh utilization. Primary outcome was recurrent hernia determined by clinical examination at least 1 year after surgery in all living patients. Current literature underwent meta-analysis regarding outcomes and mode of follow-up. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were included with a mean age of 52.2 years and a mean defect size of 214.9 cm(2), respectively. Twenty-nine patients (38.7%) had a recurrent hernia after a mean of 40.9-month follow-up, and this was significantly higher than in the literature (14.0%, P < .01). Sixty-four percent of studies in the literature were unclear about the method of determining recurrent hernia or included telephone follow-up and questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: CST coincides with a high recurrence rate when clinical follow-up is longer than a year. Reported recurrence rates are probably underestimated because the method and duration of follow-up are inadequate.
Authors: A Torregrosa-Gallud; J Sancho Muriel; J Bueno-Lledó; P García Pastor; J Iserte-Hernandez; S Bonafé-Diana; O Carreño-Sáenz; F Carbonell-Tatay Journal: Hernia Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: Arianna Birindelli; Massimo Sartelli; Salomone Di Saverio; Federico Coccolini; Luca Ansaloni; Gabrielle H van Ramshorst; Giampiero Campanelli; Vladimir Khokha; Ernest E Moore; Andrew Peitzman; George Velmahos; Frederick Alan Moore; Ari Leppaniemi; Clay Cothren Burlew; Walter L Biffl; Kaoru Koike; Yoram Kluger; Gustavo P Fraga; Carlos A Ordonez; Matteo Novello; Ferdinando Agresta; Boris Sakakushev; Igor Gerych; Imtiaz Wani; Michael D Kelly; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Mario Paulo Faro; Antonio Tarasconi; Zaza Demetrashvili; Jae Gil Lee; Nereo Vettoretto; Gianluca Guercioni; Roberto Persiani; Cristian Tranà; Yunfeng Cui; Kenneth Y Y Kok; Wagih M Ghnnam; Ashraf El-Sayed Abbas; Norio Sato; Sanjay Marwah; Muthukumaran Rangarajan; Offir Ben-Ishay; Abdul Rashid K Adesunkanmi; Helmut Alfredo Segovia Lohse; Jakub Kenig; Stefano Mandalà; Raul Coimbra; Aneel Bhangu; Nigel Suggett; Antonio Biondi; Nazario Portolani; Gianluca Baiocchi; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Rodolfo Scibé; Michael Sugrue; Osvaldo Chiara; Fausto Catena Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 5.469