Literature DB >> 27334966

Biologic mesh for repair of ventral hernias in contaminated fields: long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Amin Madani1,2, Petru Niculiseanu3, Wanda Marini3, Pepa A Kaneva3, Benjamin Mappin-Kasirer3, Melina C Vassiliou4,3, Kosar Khwaja4,3, Paola Fata4, Gerald M Fried4,3, Liane S Feldman4,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend biologic prosthetics for ventral hernia repair (VHR) in contaminated fields, yet long-term and patient-reported data are limited. We aimed to determine the long-term rate of hernia recurrence, and other clinical and patient-reported outcomes following the use of porcine small intestine submucosa (PSIS) for VHR in a contaminated field.
METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing open VHR with PSIS mesh in a contaminated field from 2004 to 2014 were prospectively evaluated for hernia recurrence and other post-operative complications. Multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses identified predictors of hernia recurrence and surgical site infection. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using SF-36, Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey (HerQLes) and Body Image Questionnaire instruments.
RESULTS: Forty-six hernias were repaired in clean-contaminated [16 (35 %)], contaminated [11 (24 %)] and dirty [19 (41 %)] fields. Median follow-up was 47 months [interquartile range: 31-79] and all patients had greater than 12-month follow-up. Sixteen patients (35 %) were not re-examined. Incidence of surgical site events and surgical site infection were 43 % (n = 20) and 56 % (n = 25), respectively. American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3 or greater was an independent predictor of surgical site infection (odds ratio 5.34 [95 % confidence interval 1.01-41.80], p = 0.04). Hernia recurrence occurred in 61 % (n = 28) with a median time to diagnosis of 16 months [interquartile range 8-26]. After bridged repair, 16 of 18 patients (89 %) recurred, compared to 12 of 28 (43 %) when fascia was approximated (p < 0.01). Bridged repair was an independent predictor of recurrence (odds ratio 10.67 [95 % confidence interval 2.42-76.08], p < 0.01). Patients with recurrences had significantly worse scores on the SF-36 mental health component and self-perceived body image, whereas HerQLes scores were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: Hernia recurrences and wound infections are high with the use of biologic PSIS mesh in contaminated surgical fields. Careful consideration is warranted using this approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biologics; Hernia; Recurrence; Surgical site infection; Surgisis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27334966     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5044-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  35 in total

1.  Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Justin H Booth; Patrick B Garvey; Donald P Baumann; Jesse C Selber; Alexander T Nguyen; Mark W Clemens; Jun Liu; Charles E Butler
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Polypropylene mesh closure of infected abdominal wounds.

Authors:  J W Jones; G J Jurkovich
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Functional abdominal wall reconstruction improves core physiology and quality-of-life.

Authors:  Cory N Criss; Clayton C Petro; David M Krpata; Christina M Seafler; Nicola Lai; Justin Fiutem; Yuri W Novitsky; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  Outcomes research in surgery.

Authors:  F D Brenneman; J G Wright; E D Kennedy; R S McLeod
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Quality of Life and Surgical Outcome 1 Year After Open and Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair: PROLOVE: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Peder Rogmark; Ulf Petersson; Sven Bringman; Emmanuel Ezra; Johanna Österberg; Agneta Montgomery
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  A patient-centered appraisal of outcomes following abdominal wall reconstruction: a systematic review of the current literature.

Authors:  Michael Sosin; Ketan M Patel; Frank P Albino; Maurice Y Nahabedian; Parag Bhanot
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.

Authors:  Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh.

Authors:  Michael J Rosen; David M Krpata; Bridget Ermlich; Jeffrey A Blatnik
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.

Authors:  M S Dunker; A M Stiggelbout; R A van Hogezand; J Ringers; G Griffioen; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Design and initial implementation of HerQLes: a hernia-related quality-of-life survey to assess abdominal wall function.

Authors:  David M Krpata; Brian J Schmotzer; Susan Flocke; Judy Jin; Jeffrey A Blatnik; Bridget Ermlich; Yuri W Novitsky; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Rare cause of right-sided lower abdominal pain].

Authors:  J Niclas; T Machemehl; M Melullis; R Goller; N Huschitt; T Hauer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Prevention of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure with different reinforcing mesh types: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roberto Peltrini; Nicola Imperatore; Gaia Altieri; Simone Castiglioni; Maria Michela Di Nuzzo; Luciano Grimaldi; Michele D'Ambra; Ruggero Lionetti; Umberto Bracale; Francesco Corcione
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Systematic review of the stage of innovation of biological mesh for complex or contaminated abdominal wall closure.

Authors:  S K Kamarajah; S J Chapman; J Glasbey; D Morton; N Smart; T Pinkney; A Bhangu
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-06-14

4.  Retromuscular Mesh Repair Using Fibrin Glue: Early Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness of an Evolving Technique.

Authors:  Irfan A Rhemtulla; Michael G Tecce; Robyn B Broach; Charles A Messa; Jaclyn T Mauch; John P Fischer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-04-11

Review 5.  What is the evidence for the use of biologic or biosynthetic meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction?

Authors:  F Köckerling; N N Alam; S A Antoniou; I R Daniels; F Famiglietti; R H Fortelny; M M Heiss; F Kallinowski; I Kyle-Leinhase; F Mayer; M Miserez; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; F Muysoms; S K Narang; A Petter-Puchner; W Reinpold; H Scheuerlein; M Smietanski; B Stechemesser; C Strey; G Woeste; N J Smart
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.739

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.