Literature DB >> 24933527

Finding an emotional face in a crowd: emotional and perceptual stimulus factors influence visual search efficiency.

Daniel Lundqvist1, Neil Bruce, Arne Öhman.   

Abstract

In this article, we examine how emotional and perceptual stimulus factors influence visual search efficiency. In an initial task, we run a visual search task, using a large number of target/distractor emotion combinations. In two subsequent tasks, we then assess measures of perceptual (rated and computational distances) and emotional (rated valence, arousal and potency) stimulus properties. In a series of regression analyses, we then explore the degree to which target salience (the size of target/distractor dissimilarities) on these emotional and perceptual measures predict the outcome on search efficiency measures (response times and accuracy) from the visual search task. The results show that both emotional and perceptual stimulus salience contribute to visual search efficiency. The results show that among the emotional measures, salience on arousal measures was more influential than valence salience. The importance of the arousal factor may be a contributing factor to contradictory history of results within this field.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arousal; Perceptual salience; Valence; Visual attention; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24933527     DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2014.927352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Emot        ISSN: 0269-9931


  9 in total

Review 1.  The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies?

Authors:  Rianne van Rooijen; Annemie Ploeger; Mariska E Kret
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

2.  Count on arousal: introducing a new method for investigating the effects of emotional valence and arousal on visual search performance.

Authors:  Andras Norbert Zsido; Laszlo Bernath; Beatrix Labadi; Anita Deak
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-01-09

3.  Functional neural correlates of facial affect recognition impairment following TBI.

Authors:  Arianna Rigon; Michelle W Voss; Lyn S Turkstra; Bilge Mutlu; Melissa C Duff
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.978

4.  The angry versus happy recognition advantage: the role of emotional and physical properties.

Authors:  Filipa Barros; Sandra C Soares; Marta Rocha; Pedro Bem-Haja; Samuel Silva; Daniel Lundqvist
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-02-03

5.  More than meets the heart: systolic amplification of different emotional faces is task dependent.

Authors:  Mateo Leganes-Fonteneau; Jennifer F Buckman; Keisuke Suzuki; Anthony Pawlak; Marsha E Bates
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2020-10-19

6.  Behavioral and ERP measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: poor reliability and lack of correlation with anxiety.

Authors:  Emily S Kappenman; Jaclyn L Farrens; Steven J Luck; Greg Hajcak Proudfit
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-04

7.  The Sustained Influence of an Error on Future Decision-Making.

Authors:  Björn C Schiffler; Sara L Bengtsson; Daniel Lundqvist
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-29

Review 8.  Affect-Driven Attention Biases as Animal Welfare Indicators: Review and Methods.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Gareth Arnott; Emily J Bethell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Attention and cardiac phase boost judgments of trust.

Authors:  Xinyi Li; Michelle Chiu; Khena M Swallow; Eve De Rosa; Adam K Anderson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.