Literature DB >> 29318376

Count on arousal: introducing a new method for investigating the effects of emotional valence and arousal on visual search performance.

Andras Norbert Zsido1, Laszlo Bernath2, Beatrix Labadi3, Anita Deak3.   

Abstract

There is a large body of research, indicating that threatening stimuli with evolutionary history are prioritised in visual processing. It has been proposed that all threatening stimuli are prioritised, irrespective of evolutionary age, but it was argued that the method used to produce the results was not suitable for investigating the phenomenon. We present a new visual search task and provide evidence that it is an appropriate tool for future research. In Experiment 1, we investigated how the influence of emotional stimuli on visual search performance varies with valence (negative, positive, and neutral) and arousal (medium and high). Negative valence found to have a greater impact. Furthermore, our results underscore the importance of controlling for arousal. Experiment 2 confirmed these findings and also revealed that negative valence decreases performance by diverting attention away from the task, but arousal can compensate for this by increasing attentional capacity. This mechanism does not seem to be affected by the evolutionary history of the stimulus. In Experiment 3, we reproduced these results using a touchscreen monitor and controlling for variance in low-level visual features. We claim that these results support the notion of preferential processing of threatening cues, regardless of evolutionary origin. However, the level of threat, i.e., how arousing the cue is, has to be taken into account to explain the findings.

Keywords:  Arousal; Evolutionary age; Threat; Valence; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29318376     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-018-0974-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  41 in total

Review 1.  Phobias and preparedness: the selective, automatic, and encapsulated nature of fear.

Authors:  Susan Mineka; Arne Ohman
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Snakes and cats in the flower bed: fast detection is not specific to pictures of fear-relevant animals.

Authors:  Ottmar V Lipp; Nazanin Derakshan; Allison M Waters; Sandra Logies
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2004-09

3.  Controlling low-level image properties: the SHINE toolbox.

Authors:  Verena Willenbockel; Javid Sadr; Daniel Fiset; Greg O Horne; Frédéric Gosselin; James W Tanaka
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-08

4.  Arousal-Biased Competition in Perception and Memory.

Authors:  Mara Mather; Matthew R Sutherland
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-03

5.  Display organization and the detection of horizontal line segments.

Authors:  G Moraglia
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-03

6.  Distractibility is a function of engagement, not task difficulty: Evidence from a new oculomotor capture paradigm.

Authors:  Simona Buetti; Alejandro Lleras
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-10

Review 7.  Slithering snakes, angry men and out-group members: what and whom are we evolved to fear?

Authors:  Kimberley M Mallan; Ottmar V Lipp; Benjamin Cochrane
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2013-04-05

Review 8.  The visual detection of threat: a cautionary tale.

Authors:  Philip T Quinlan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

9.  Testing the snake-detection hypothesis: larger early posterior negativity in humans to pictures of snakes than to pictures of other reptiles, spiders and slugs.

Authors:  Jan W Van Strien; Ingmar H A Franken; Jorg Huijding
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Appraising the role of visual threat in speeded detection and classification tasks.

Authors:  Yue Yue; Philip T Quinlan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-16
View more
  6 in total

1.  The effects of task-irrelevant threatening stimuli on orienting- and executive attentional processes under cognitive load.

Authors:  Andras N Zsidó; Diana T Stecina; Rebecca Cseh; Michael C Hout
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2021-11-12

2.  An incremental dual-task paradigm to investigate pain attenuation by task difficulty, affective content and threat value.

Authors:  Quoc C Vuong; Angela Owen; Kehinde Akin-Akinyosoye; Vera Araujo-Soares
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Does Threat Have an Advantage After All? - Proposing a Novel Experimental Design to Investigate the Advantages of Threat-Relevant Cues in Visual Processing.

Authors:  Andras N Zsido; Arpad Csatho; Andras Matuz; Diana Stecina; Akos Arato; Orsolya Inhof; Gergely Darnai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-27

Review 4.  Are Humans Prepared to Detect, Fear, and Avoid Snakes? The Mismatch Between Laboratory and Ecological Evidence.

Authors:  Carlos M Coelho; Panrapee Suttiwan; Abul M Faiz; Fernando Ferreira-Santos; Andras N Zsido
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-11

Review 5.  Affect-Driven Attention Biases as Animal Welfare Indicators: Review and Methods.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Gareth Arnott; Emily J Bethell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  The influence of stimuli valence, extraversion, and emotion regulation on visual search within real-world scenes.

Authors:  Robert C A Bendall; Peter Eachus; Catherine Thompson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.