Literature DB >> 24933517

Action video games do not improve the speed of information processing in simple perceptual tasks.

Don van Ravenzwaaij1, Wouter Boekel2, Birte U Forstmann2, Roger Ratcliff3, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers2.   

Abstract

Previous research suggests that playing action video games improves performance on sensory, perceptual, and attentional tasks. For instance, Green, Pouget, and Bavelier (2010) used the diffusion model to decompose data from a motion detection task and estimate the contribution of several underlying psychological processes. Their analysis indicated that playing action video games leads to faster information processing, reduced response caution, and no difference in motor responding. Because perceptual learning is generally thought to be highly context-specific, this transfer from gaming is surprising and warrants corroborative evidence from a large-scale training study. We conducted 2 experiments in which participants practiced either an action video game or a cognitive game in 5 separate, supervised sessions. Prior to each session and following the last session, participants performed a perceptual discrimination task. In the second experiment, we included a third condition in which no video games were played at all. Behavioral data and diffusion model parameters showed similar practice effects for the action gamers, the cognitive gamers, and the nongamers and suggest that, in contrast to earlier reports, playing action video games does not improve the speed of information processing in simple perceptual tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24933517      PMCID: PMC4447196          DOI: 10.1037/a0036923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  40 in total

1.  Mechanisms of generalization in perceptual learning.

Authors:  Z Liu; D Weinshall
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Francis Tuerlinckx
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

3.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance.

Authors:  K H Britten; M N Shadlen; W T Newsome; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Enumeration versus multiple object tracking: the case of action video game players.

Authors:  C S Green; D Bavelier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-12-15

5.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

Review 6.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  A diffusion model decomposition of the practice effect.

Authors:  Gilles Dutilh; Joachim Vandekerckhove; Francis Tuerlinckx; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

8.  Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders.

Authors:  Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff; Michael W Vasey; Gail McKoon
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.223

9.  Modeling the effects of hypoglycemia on a two-choice task in adult humans.

Authors:  Jacqueline Geddes; Roger Ratcliff; Michael Allerhand; Russ Childers; Rohana J Wright; Brian M Frier; Ian J Deary
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Do action video games improve perception and cognition?

Authors:  Walter R Boot; Daniel P Blakely; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-09-13
View more
  15 in total

1.  How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list.

Authors:  Alexander Etz; Quentin F Gronau; Fabian Dablander; Peter A Edelsbrunner; Beth Baribault
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

Review 2.  Effects of cognitive training on the structure of intelligence.

Authors:  John Protzko
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

3.  Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness Against Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  The brain-games conundrum: does cognitive training really sharpen the mind?

Authors:  Walter R Boot; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Cerebrum       Date:  2014-11-03

5.  The challenges of developing a contrast-based video game for treatment of amblyopia.

Authors:  Zahra Hussain; Andrew T Astle; Ben S Webb; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-03

6.  A large scale test of the gaming-enhancement hypothesis.

Authors:  Andrew K Przybylski; John C Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Action video gaming and the brain: fMRI effects without behavioral effects in visual and verbal cognitive tasks.

Authors:  Fabio Richlan; Juliane Schubert; Rebecca Mayer; Florian Hutzler; Martin Kronbichler
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 2.708

8.  The EZ diffusion model provides a powerful test of simple empirical effects.

Authors:  Don van Ravenzwaaij; Chris Donkin; Joachim Vandekerckhove
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

9.  How we see electronic games.

Authors:  Andrew K Przybylski; Netta Weinstein
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Model Complexity in Diffusion Modeling: Benefits of Making the Model More Parsimonious.

Authors:  Veronika Lerche; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.