OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the efficacy of the Marriage Checkup (MC) for improving relationship health and intimacy. METHOD:Cohabiting married couples (N = 215, Mage women = 44.5 years, men = 47 years, 93.1% Caucasian) recruited from a northeastern U.S. metropolitan area through print and electronic media were randomly assigned to MC treatment or wait-list control. Treatment but not control couples participated in assessment and feedback visits, at the beginning of the study and again 1 year later. All couples completed 9 sets of questionnaires over 2 years. Outcome measures included the Quality of Marriage Index, the Global Distress subscale of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory-Revised, the Intimate Safety Questionnaire, and the Relational Acceptance Questionnaire. RESULTS: A latent growth curve model indicated significant between-group differences in intimacy at every measurement point after baseline (d ranged from .20 to .55, Md = .37), significant between-group differences in women's felt acceptance for every measurement point after baseline (d ranged from .17 to .47, Md = .34), significant between-group differences in men's felt acceptance through the 1-year 2-week follow-up (d across follow-up ranged from .11 to .40, Md = .25), and significant between-group differences in relationship distress through 1-year 6-month follow-up (d across follow-up ranged from .11 to .39, Md = .23). CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal analysis of the MC supports the hypothesis that the MC significantly improves intimacy, acceptance, and satisfaction. Implications for dissemination are discussed. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the efficacy of the Marriage Checkup (MC) for improving relationship health and intimacy. METHOD: Cohabiting married couples (N = 215, Mage women = 44.5 years, men = 47 years, 93.1% Caucasian) recruited from a northeastern U.S. metropolitan area through print and electronic media were randomly assigned to MC treatment or wait-list control. Treatment but not control couples participated in assessment and feedback visits, at the beginning of the study and again 1 year later. All couples completed 9 sets of questionnaires over 2 years. Outcome measures included the Quality of Marriage Index, the Global Distress subscale of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory-Revised, the Intimate Safety Questionnaire, and the Relational Acceptance Questionnaire. RESULTS: A latent growth curve model indicated significant between-group differences in intimacy at every measurement point after baseline (d ranged from .20 to .55, Md = .37), significant between-group differences in women's felt acceptance for every measurement point after baseline (d ranged from .17 to .47, Md = .34), significant between-group differences in men's felt acceptance through the 1-year 2-week follow-up (d across follow-up ranged from .11 to .40, Md = .25), and significant between-group differences in relationship distress through 1-year 6-month follow-up (d across follow-up ranged from .11 to .39, Md = .23). CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal analysis of the MC supports the hypothesis that the MC significantly improves intimacy, acceptance, and satisfaction. Implications for dissemination are discussed. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.
Authors: Melinda Ippolito Morrill; Cj Eubanks-Fleming; Amanda G Harp; Julia W Sollenberger; Ellen V Darling; James V Cördova Journal: Fam Process Date: 2011-12
Authors: James V Cordova; Jeffrey A Cigrang; Tatiana D Gray; Elizabeth Najera; Matt Havrilenko; Crystal Pinkley; Matthew Nielsen; JoLyn Tatum; Kristen Redd Journal: J Clin Psychol Med Settings Date: 2017-12
Authors: Brian D Doss; Larisa N Cicila; Emily J Georgia; McKenzie K Roddy; Kathryn M Nowlan; Lisa A Benson; Andrew Christensen Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2016-01-25