Literature DB >> 24931074

Do natural methods count? underreporting of natural contraception in urban Burkina Faso.

Clémentine Rossier1, Leigh Senderowicz, Abdramane Soura.   

Abstract

Natural methods of contraception were widely used in developed countries until the late 1960s to space and limit childbirth. In France, when the first contraceptive surveys were conducted, researchers noticed that the use of natural methods was underreported, and questions to correct for this bias were subsequently added. The Demographic and Health Surveys do not currently include questions specific to natural methods. We added such questions to the standard DHS question regarding current contraceptive use when we conducted the Health and Demographic Surveillance System of Ouagadougou (2010 Ouaga HDSS) health survey in Burkina Faso among 758 women aged 15-49. Doing so enabled us to find a notable increase in the proportion of women in union who reported practicing contraception: 58 percent, compared with 38 percent in Ouagadougou in the 2010 Burkina Faso DHS. Thirty-two percent of women reported using modern medical methods or condoms in both surveys, but use of natural methods was much greater in the 2010 Ouaga HDSS health survey (26 percent) than in the 2010 Burkina Faso DHS (5 percent). Many women classified as having unmet need for family planning in Ouagadougou by the DHS data are in fact users of natural methods. Additional questions that would measure use of natural methods more completely should be tested in different settings.
© 2013 The Population Council, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24931074     DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00383.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Fam Plann        ISSN: 0039-3665


  10 in total

1.  Contemporary Use of Traditional Contraception in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Clémentine Rossier; Jamaica Corker
Journal:  Popul Dev Rev       Date:  2017-01-20

2.  Fear, opposition, ambivalence, and omission: Results from a follow-up study on unmet need for family planning in Ghana.

Authors:  Sarah Staveteig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Estimating infertility prevalence in low-to-middle-income countries: an application of a current duration approach to Demographic and Health Survey data.

Authors:  Chelsea B Polis; Carie M Cox; Özge Tunçalp; Alexander C McLain; Marie E Thoma
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Design and methodology of a mixed methods follow-up study to the 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey.

Authors:  Sarah Staveteig; Richmond Aryeetey; Michael Anie-Ansah; Clement Ahiadeke; Ladys Ortiz
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  Reporting sterilization as a current contraceptive method among sterilized women: lessons learned from a population with high sterilization rates, Rajasthan, India.

Authors:  Yoonjoung Choi; Anoop Khanna; Linnea Zimmerman; Scott Radloff; Blake Zachary; Danish Ahmad
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Correlates of use of withdrawal for contraception among women in Vietnam.

Authors:  Nghia Nguyen; Linh Nguyen; Hoai Nguyen; Maria F Gallo
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Pathways to Modern Family Planning: A Longitudinal Study on Social Influence among Men and Women in Benin.

Authors:  Susan Igras; Sarah Burgess; Heather Chantelois-Kashal; Mariam Diakité; Monica Giuffrida; Rebecka Lundgren
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2021-02-08

8.  Contraceptive Method Mix: Updates and Implications.

Authors:  Jane T Bertrand; John Ross; Tara M Sullivan; Karen Hardee; James D Shelton
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2020-12-23

9.  Let's Talk About Sex: Improving Measurement of Contraceptive Use in Cross-Sectional Surveys by Accounting for Sexual Activity Recency.

Authors:  Suzanne O Bell; Elizabeth Larson; Shannon N Wood
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2022-04-29

10.  A practical alternative to calculating unmet need for family planning.

Authors:  Irit Sinai; Susan Igras; Rebecka Lundgren
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2017-07-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.