PURPOSE: To explore Ghanaian pregnant women's understanding and recognition of danger signs in pregnancy, birth preparedness and complication readiness, and their understanding of newborn care. DESIGN: An exploratory, qualitative study design was used. METHODS: Data were gathered through six focus group discussions with 68 pregnant women attending antenatal care at a busy urban hospital in Ghana. Qualitative and descriptive data were analyzed using SPSS version 21. Health literacy was used as the guiding framework to analyze the qualitative data. Data were analyzed in the content domains of (a) understanding and recognition of danger signs in pregnancy, (b) preparedness for childbirth, (c) understanding and recognition of danger signs in the newborn, and (d) appropriate and timely referral. FINDINGS: Women in this study identified danger signs of pregnancy and in the newborn, but had difficulty interpreting and operationalizing information they received during antenatal care visits, indicating that health education did not translate to appropriate health behaviors. Cultural beliefs in alternative medicine, lack of understanding, and prior negative encounters with healthcare professionals may have led to underutilization of professional midwives for delivery and health services. CONCLUSIONS: Women in this study exhibited low health literacy by incorrectly interpreting and operationalizing health education received during antenatal care. With limited health literacy, pregnant women cannot fully comprehend the scope of services that a health system can provide for them and their families. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Achieving the greatest impact with limited time in antenatal care is a challenge. Since antenatal care is widely available to pregnant women in Ghana, it is vital to reexamine the way antenatal education is delivered. Pregnant women must receive health information that is accurate and easy to understand in order to make informed health choices that will improve maternal and child health.
PURPOSE: To explore Ghanaian pregnant women's understanding and recognition of danger signs in pregnancy, birth preparedness and complication readiness, and their understanding of newborn care. DESIGN: An exploratory, qualitative study design was used. METHODS: Data were gathered through six focus group discussions with 68 pregnant women attending antenatal care at a busy urban hospital in Ghana. Qualitative and descriptive data were analyzed using SPSS version 21. Health literacy was used as the guiding framework to analyze the qualitative data. Data were analyzed in the content domains of (a) understanding and recognition of danger signs in pregnancy, (b) preparedness for childbirth, (c) understanding and recognition of danger signs in the newborn, and (d) appropriate and timely referral. FINDINGS:Women in this study identified danger signs of pregnancy and in the newborn, but had difficulty interpreting and operationalizing information they received during antenatal care visits, indicating that health education did not translate to appropriate health behaviors. Cultural beliefs in alternative medicine, lack of understanding, and prior negative encounters with healthcare professionals may have led to underutilization of professional midwives for delivery and health services. CONCLUSIONS:Women in this study exhibited low health literacy by incorrectly interpreting and operationalizing health education received during antenatal care. With limited health literacy, pregnant women cannot fully comprehend the scope of services that a health system can provide for them and their families. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Achieving the greatest impact with limited time in antenatal care is a challenge. Since antenatal care is widely available to pregnant women in Ghana, it is vital to reexamine the way antenatal education is delivered. Pregnant women must receive health information that is accurate and easy to understand in order to make informed health choices that will improve maternal and child health.
Authors: J Villar; H Ba'aqeel; G Piaggio; P Lumbiganon; J Miguel Belizán; U Farnot; Y Al-Mazrou; G Carroli; A Pinol; A Donner; A Langer; G Nigenda; M Mugford; J Fox-Rushby; G Hutton; P Bergsjø; L Bakketeig; H Berendes; J Garcia Journal: Lancet Date: 2001-05-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Andrea B Pembe; Anders Carlstedt; David P Urassa; Gunilla Lindmark; Lennarth Nyström; Elisabeth Darj Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Jody R Lori; Henrietta Ofosu-Darkwah; Carol J Boyd; Tanima Banerjee; Richard M K Adanu Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: José A Tique; Leigh M Howard; Sandra Gaveta; Mohsin Sidat; Russell L Rothman; Sten H Vermund; Philip J Ciampa Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2017-03
Authors: Evans Kofi Agbeno; Joseph Osarfo; Gloria Brempomaa Owusu; Douglas Opoku Aninng; Betty Anane-Fenin; Judith Agyemang Amponsah; Joycelyn A Ashong; Anthony Ofori Amanfo; Sebastian Ken-Amoah; Harrison Tetteh Kudjonu; Mouhajer Mohammed Journal: SAGE Open Med Date: 2022-03-21