Kenan W D Stern1, Kimberlee Gauvreau2, Tal Geva2, Oscar J Benavidez3. 1. Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: kstern@montefiore.org. 2. Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Pediatric/Congenital Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infants and young children frequently have difficulty remaining still for an echocardiographic examination, potentially leading to poor study quality, increasing the likelihood of diagnostic errors. Sedation is believed to improve echocardiographic quality, but its effectiveness has not been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that sedation would improve study quality and reduce diagnostic errors. METHODS: Outpatient echocardiograms from children aged ≤36 months obtained from January 2008 to June 2009 were examined. Variables related to image quality, report completeness, and sedation use were collected. Diagnostic errors were identified and categorized. Multivariate analysis identified the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for risk factors for potentially preventable diagnostic errors and the impact of sedation on these errors. RESULTS: Among 2,003 echocardiographic examinations, sedation was used in 498 (25%). The overall diagnostic error rate was 6.5%. Most errors (66%) were potentially preventable. Multivariate analysis identified the following risk factors for potentially preventable errors: precardiac procedure (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.05-4.59; P = .04), moderate anatomic complexity (OR, 3.91; 95% CI, 2.25-6.81; P < .001), and high anatomic complexity (OR, 8.36; 95% CI, 3.57-19.6; P < .001). Sedation was independently associated with lower odds of potentially preventable diagnostic errors (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27-0.80; P = .006). Echocardiographic examinations with sedation had fewer image quality concerns (22% vs 60%) and fewer incomplete reports (3% vs 20%) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Most echocardiographic diagnostic errors among infants and young children are potentially preventable. Sedation is associated with a lower likelihood of these diagnostic errors, fewer imaging quality concerns, and fewer incomplete reports.
BACKGROUND:Infants and young children frequently have difficulty remaining still for an echocardiographic examination, potentially leading to poor study quality, increasing the likelihood of diagnostic errors. Sedation is believed to improve echocardiographic quality, but its effectiveness has not been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that sedation would improve study quality and reduce diagnostic errors. METHODS:Outpatient echocardiograms from children aged ≤36 months obtained from January 2008 to June 2009 were examined. Variables related to image quality, report completeness, and sedation use were collected. Diagnostic errors were identified and categorized. Multivariate analysis identified the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for risk factors for potentially preventable diagnostic errors and the impact of sedation on these errors. RESULTS: Among 2,003 echocardiographic examinations, sedation was used in 498 (25%). The overall diagnostic error rate was 6.5%. Most errors (66%) were potentially preventable. Multivariate analysis identified the following risk factors for potentially preventable errors: precardiac procedure (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.05-4.59; P = .04), moderate anatomic complexity (OR, 3.91; 95% CI, 2.25-6.81; P < .001), and high anatomic complexity (OR, 8.36; 95% CI, 3.57-19.6; P < .001). Sedation was independently associated with lower odds of potentially preventable diagnostic errors (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27-0.80; P = .006). Echocardiographic examinations with sedation had fewer image quality concerns (22% vs 60%) and fewer incomplete reports (3% vs 20%) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Most echocardiographic diagnostic errors among infants and young children are potentially preventable. Sedation is associated with a lower likelihood of these diagnostic errors, fewer imaging quality concerns, and fewer incomplete reports.
Authors: Luis Alesandro Larrazabal; Pedro J del Nido; Kathy J Jenkins; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Ronald Lacro; Steve D Colan; Frank Pigula; Oscar J Benavidez; Francis Fynn-Thompson; John E Mayer; Emile A Bacha Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Ali S Saber Tehrani; HeeWon Lee; Simon C Mathews; Andrew Shore; Martin A Makary; Peter J Pronovost; David E Newman-Toker Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Lisa C Heistein; Claudio Ramaciotti; William A Scott; Melanie Coursey; Paul W Sheeran; Matthew S Lemler Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2006-02-15 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Heike E Daldrup-Link; Christina Sammet; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Katherine A Barsness; Anne Marie Cahill; Ellen Chung; Andrea S Doria; Kassa Darge; Rajesh Krishnamurthy; Matthew P Lungren; Sheila Moore; Laura Olivieri; Ashok Panigrahy; Alexander J Towbin; Andrew Trout; Stephan Voss Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2016-02-02 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Jason L Williams; Muhammad Aanish Raees; Sudeep Sunthankar; Stacy A S Killen; David Bichell; David A Parra; Jonathan H Soslow Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2020-04-04 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Kenan W D Stern; Chen Chen; Hillel W Cohen; Joseph Mahgerefteh; Sarah A Chambers; Leo Lopez Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 1.655