Literature DB >> 24929181

A domain analysis model for eIRB systems: addressing the weak link in clinical research informatics.

Shan He1, Scott P Narus2, Julio C Facelli3, Lee Min Lau4, Jefferey R Botkin3, John F Hurdle3.   

Abstract

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are a critical component of clinical research and can become a significant bottleneck due to the dramatic increase, in both volume and complexity of clinical research. Despite the interest in developing clinical research informatics (CRI) systems and supporting data standards to increase clinical research efficiency and interoperability, informatics research in the IRB domain has not attracted much attention in the scientific community. The lack of standardized and structured application forms across different IRBs causes inefficient and inconsistent proposal reviews and cumbersome workflows. These issues are even more prominent in multi-institutional clinical research that is rapidly becoming the norm. This paper proposes and evaluates a domain analysis model for electronic IRB (eIRB) systems, paving the way for streamlined clinical research workflow via integration with other CRI systems and improved IRB application throughput via computer-assisted decision support.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical research informatics; Domain analysis model; Electronic IRB; Electronic data processing; IRB

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24929181      PMCID: PMC4384433          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  16 in total

Review 1.  Institutional review boards and multisite studies in health services research: is there a better way?

Authors:  Jennifer L Gold; Carolyn S Dewa
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Financial anatomy of biomedical research.

Authors:  Hamilton Moses; E Ray Dorsey; David H M Matheson; Samuel O Thier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  A review finds that multicenter studies face substantial challenges but strategies exist to achieve Institutional Review Board approval.

Authors:  Sarah M Greene; Ann M Geiger
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Ethics. Identifiability in genomic research.

Authors:  William W Lowrance; Francis S Collins
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The BRIDG project: a technical report.

Authors:  Douglas B Fridsma; Julie Evans; Smita Hastak; Charles N Mead
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Data standards in clinical research: gaps, overlaps, challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Rachel L Richesson; Jeffrey Krischer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: the state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform.

Authors:  George Silberman; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Breaking the camel's back: multicenter clinical trials and local institutional review boards.

Authors:  W J Burman; R R Reves; D L Cohn; R T Schooley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-01-16       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Survey of u.s. Human research protection organizations: workload and membership.

Authors:  Joseph A Catania; Bernard Lo; Leslie E Wolf; M Margaret Dolcini; Lance M Pollack; Judith C Barker; Stacey Wertlieb; Jeff Henne
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Principal investigator views of the IRB system.

Authors:  Simon N Whitney; Kirsten Alcser; Carl Schneider; Laurence B McCullough; Amy L McGuire; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  4 in total

1.  Information Technology for Clinical, Translational and Comparative Effectiveness Research. Findings from the Yearbook 2015 Section on Clinical Research Informatics.

Authors:  C Daniel; R Choquet
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2015-08-13

2.  IRB reliance: An informatics approach.

Authors:  Jihad S Obeid; Randall W Alexander; Stephanie M Gentilin; Brigette White; Christine B Turley; Kathleen T Brady; Leslie A Lenert
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Reducing the Single IRB Burden: Streamlining Electronic IRB Systems.

Authors:  Alexandra Murray; Ekaterina Pivovarova; Robert Klitzman; Deborah F Stiles; Paul Appelbaum; Charles W Lidz
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2020-09-25

Review 4.  The development of large-scale de-identified biomedical databases in the age of genomics-principles and challenges.

Authors:  Fida K Dankar; Andrey Ptitsyn; Samar K Dankar
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 4.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.