Literature DB >> 24928890

Sparking connections: toward better linkages between research and human health policy-an example with multiwalled carbon nanotubes.

Christina M Powers1, Jeff Gift1, Geniece M Lehmann2.   

Abstract

Risk assessment and subsequent risk management of environmental contaminants can benefit from early collaboration among researchers, risk assessors, and risk managers. The benefits of collaboration in research planning are particularly evident in light of (1) increasing calls to expand upon the risk assessment paradigm to include a greater focus on problem formulation and consideration of potential tradeoffs between risk management options, and (2) decreasing research budgets. Strategically connecting research planning to future decision making may be most critical in areas of emerging science for which data are often insufficient to clearly direct targeted research to support future risk assessment and management efforts. This article illustrates an application of the comprehensive environmental assessment approach to inform research planning for future risk assessment and management of one emerging material, multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). High-priority research areas identified for MWCNTs in flame-retardant coatings applied to upholstery textiles included the following: release across the product life cycle; environmental transport, transformation and fate in air, wastewater and sediment; exposure in human occupational and consumer groups; kinetics in the human body; impacts on human health and aquatic populations; and impacts on economic, social, and environmental resources. This article focuses on specific research questions related to human health and how these may connect to future risk assessments and risk management efforts. Such connections will support more effective collaborations across the scientific community and may inform the prioritization of research funding opportunities for emerging materials like MWCNTs. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Toxicological Sciences 2014. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comprehensive environmental assessment; engineered nanomaterials; multiwalled carbon nanotubes; research planning; risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24928890      PMCID: PMC4833105          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  29 in total

1.  How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers?

Authors:  John N Lavis; Dave Robertson; Jennifer M Woodside; Christopher B McLeod; Julia Abelson
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 2.  Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; Richard S Bennett; Russell J Erickson; Dale J Hoff; Michael W Hornung; Rodney D Johnson; David R Mount; John W Nichols; Christine L Russom; Patricia K Schmieder; Jose A Serrrano; Joseph E Tietge; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  A web-based tool to engage stakeholders in informing research planning for future decisions on emerging materials.

Authors:  Christina M Powers; Khara D Grieger; Christine Ogilvie Hendren; Connie A Meacham; Gerald Gurevich; Meredith Gooding Lassiter; Eric S Money; Jennifer M Lloyd; Stephen M Beaulieu
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 4.  Translating research findings into health policy.

Authors:  P Davis; P Howden-Chapman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Focusing the research efforts.

Authors:  Françoise Schrurs; Dominique Lison
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 39.213

6.  Toxicity of multiwalled carbon nanotubes with end defects critically depends on their functionalization density.

Authors:  Sanyog Jain; Vivek S Thakare; Manasmita Das; Chandraiah Godugu; Amit K Jain; Rashi Mathur; Krishna Chuttani; Anil K Mishra
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 7.  Nanomaterial toxicity testing in the 21st century: use of a predictive toxicological approach and high-throughput screening.

Authors:  Andre Nel; Tian Xia; Huan Meng; Xiang Wang; Sijie Lin; Zhaoxia Ji; Haiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 22.384

8.  Mouse pulmonary dose- and time course-responses induced by exposure to multi-walled carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Dale W Porter; Ann F Hubbs; Robert R Mercer; Nianqiang Wu; Michael G Wolfarth; Krishnan Sriram; Stephen Leonard; Lori Battelli; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Sherry Friend; Michael Andrew; Bean T Chen; Shuji Tsuruoka; Morinobu Endo; Vincent Castranova
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 4.221

9.  Inhalation toxicity of multiwall carbon nanotubes in rats exposed for 3 months.

Authors:  Lan Ma-Hock; Silke Treumann; Volker Strauss; Sandra Brill; Frederic Luizi; Michael Mertler; Karin Wiench; Armin O Gamer; Bennard van Ravenzwaay; Robert Landsiedel
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Inhaled carbon nanotubes reach the subpleural tissue in mice.

Authors:  Jessica P Ryman-Rasmussen; Mark F Cesta; Arnold R Brody; Jeanette K Shipley-Phillips; Jeffrey I Everitt; Earl W Tewksbury; Owen R Moss; Brian A Wong; Darol E Dodd; Melvin E Andersen; James C Bonner
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 39.213

View more
  1 in total

1.  Carbon Nanotubes Exposure Risk Assessment: From Toxicology to Epidemiologic Studies (Overview of the Current Problem).

Authors:  L M Fatkhutdinova; T O Khaliullin; A A Shvedova
Journal:  Nanotechnol Russ       Date:  2015-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.