Literature DB >> 24176714

A web-based tool to engage stakeholders in informing research planning for future decisions on emerging materials.

Christina M Powers1, Khara D Grieger2, Christine Ogilvie Hendren3, Connie A Meacham4, Gerald Gurevich5, Meredith Gooding Lassiter6, Eric S Money7, Jennifer M Lloyd8, Stephen M Beaulieu9.   

Abstract

Prioritizing and assessing risks associated with chemicals, industrial materials, or emerging technologies is a complex problem that benefits from the involvement of multiple stakeholder groups. For example, in the case of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs), scientific uncertainties exist that hamper environmental, health, and safety (EHS) assessments. Therefore, alternative approaches to standard EHS assessment methods have gained increased attention. The objective of this paper is to describe the application of a web-based, interactive decision support tool developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) in a pilot study on ENMs. The piloted tool implements U.S. EPA's comprehensive environmental assessment (CEA) approach to prioritize research gaps. When pursued, such research priorities can result in data that subsequently improve the scientific robustness of risk assessments and inform future risk management decisions. Pilot results suggest that the tool was useful in facilitating multi-stakeholder prioritization of research gaps. Results also provide potential improvements for subsequent applications. The outcomes of future CEAWeb applications with larger stakeholder groups may inform the development of funding opportunities for emerging materials across the scientific community (e.g., National Science Foundation Science to Achieve Results [STAR] grants, National Institutes of Health Requests for Proposals).
© 2013.

Keywords:  CEA; CEA spreadsheet tool; CEA web interface; CEAPrioritize; CEAWeb; Comprehensive environmental assessment; ENM; Engineered nanomaterials; E–RRF; HERO; Health and Environment Research Online; MCDA; MWCNTs; Research planning; Risk assessment; Stakeholder engagement; comprehensive environmental assessment; element–risk relevance factor pair; engineered nanomaterials; multi-criteria decision analysis; multiwalled carbon nanotubes

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24176714     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Sparking connections: toward better linkages between research and human health policy-an example with multiwalled carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Christina M Powers; Jeff Gift; Geniece M Lehmann
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Stakeholder Engagement in HIV Cure Research: Lessons Learned from Other HIV Interventions and the Way Forward.

Authors:  Ying-Ru Lo; Carissa Chu; Jintanat Ananworanich; Jean-Louis Excler; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 5.078

Review 3.  Needs and challenges for assessing the environmental impacts of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs).

Authors:  Michelle Romero-Franco; Hilary A Godwin; Muhammad Bilal; Yoram Cohen
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Risk Assessment of Nano-Flame Retardants Coating in the Selected Construction Industry of Iran by Control Banding Approach.

Authors:  Zahra Mohammadi; Masoume Vahabi; Seyed Mohammad Sadat; Rezvan Zendehdel
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2021-07-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.