Literature DB >> 24928774

A kinetic model of Escherichia coli core metabolism satisfying multiple sets of mutant flux data.

Ali Khodayari1, Ali R Zomorrodi1, James C Liao2, Costas D Maranas3.   

Abstract

In contrast to stoichiometric-based models, the development of large-scale kinetic models of metabolism has been hindered by the challenge of identifying kinetic parameter values and kinetic rate laws applicable to a wide range of environmental and/or genetic perturbations. The recently introduced ensemble modeling (EM) procedure provides a promising remedy to address these challenges by decomposing metabolic reactions into elementary reaction steps and incorporating all phenotypic observations, upon perturbation, in its model parameterization scheme. Here, we present a kinetic model of Escherichia coli core metabolism that satisfies the fluxomic data for wild-type and seven mutant strains by making use of the EM concepts. This model encompasses 138 reactions, 93 metabolites and 60 substrate-level regulatory interactions accounting for glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, pentose phosphate pathway, TCA cycle, major pyruvate metabolism, anaplerotic reactions and a number of reactions in other parts of the metabolism. Parameterization is performed using a formal optimization approach that minimizes the discrepancies between model predictions and flux measurements. The predicted fluxes by the model are within the uncertainty range of experimental flux data for 78% of the reactions (with measured fluxes) for both the wild-type and seven mutant strains. The remaining flux predictions are mostly within three standard deviations of reported ranges. Converting the EM-based parameters into a Michaelis-Menten equivalent formalism revealed that 35% of Km and 77% of kcat parameters are within uncertainty range of the literature-reported values. The predicted metabolite concentrations by the model are also within uncertainty ranges of metabolomic data for 68% of the metabolites. A leave-one-out cross-validation test to evaluate the flux prediction performance of the model showed that metabolic fluxes for the mutants located in the proximity of mutations used for training the model can be predicted more accurately. The constructed model and the parameterization procedure presented in this study pave the way for the construction of larger-scale kinetic models with more narrowly distributed parameter values as new metabolomic/fluxomic data sets are becoming available for E. coli and other organisms.
Copyright © 2014 International Metabolic Engineering Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ensemble modeling; Kinetic modeling; Metabolic network

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24928774     DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2014.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metab Eng        ISSN: 1096-7176            Impact factor:   9.783


  44 in total

1.  Fast growth phenotype of E. coli K-12 from adaptive laboratory evolution does not require intracellular flux rewiring.

Authors:  Christopher P Long; Jacqueline E Gonzalez; Adam M Feist; Bernhard O Palsson; Maciek R Antoniewicz
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 9.783

2.  Autocatalytic networks in biology: structural theory and algorithms.

Authors:  Mike Steel; Wim Hordijk; Joana C Xavier
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Acceleration Strategies to Enhance Metabolic Ensemble Modeling Performance.

Authors:  Jennifer L Greene; Andreas Wäechter; Keith E J Tyo; Linda J Broadbelt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Dissecting the genetic and metabolic mechanisms of adaptation to the knockout of a major metabolic enzyme in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Christopher P Long; Jacqueline E Gonzalez; Adam M Feist; Bernhard O Palsson; Maciek R Antoniewicz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Computing the functional proteome: recent progress and future prospects for genome-scale models.

Authors:  Edward J O'Brien; Bernhard O Palsson
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 9.740

6.  Synthetic Biology Meets Machine Learning.

Authors:  Brendan Fu-Long Sieow; Ryan De Sotto; Zhi Ren Darren Seet; In Young Hwang; Matthew Wook Chang
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2023

7.  Computational design and engineering of an Escherichia coli strain producing the nonstandard amino acid para-aminophenylalanine.

Authors:  Ali R Zomorrodi; Colin Hemez; Pol Arranz-Gibert; Terrence Wu; Farren J Isaacs; Daniel Segrè
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 8.  Genome-scale modelling of microbial metabolism with temporal and spatial resolution.

Authors:  Michael A Henson
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.407

9.  Characterization of physiological responses to 22 gene knockouts in Escherichia coli central carbon metabolism.

Authors:  Christopher P Long; Jacqueline E Gonzalez; Nicholas R Sandoval; Maciek R Antoniewicz
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 9.783

Review 10.  Shikimic Acid Production in Escherichia coli: From Classical Metabolic Engineering Strategies to Omics Applied to Improve Its Production.

Authors:  Juan Andrés Martínez; Francisco Bolívar; Adelfo Escalante
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.