| Literature DB >> 24928416 |
Hong-Xia Bao, Le Tang, Lu Yu, Xu-Yao Wang, Yang Li, Xia Deng, Yong-Guo Li, Ang Li, Da-Ling Zhu, Randal N Johnston, Gui-Rong Liu1, Ye Feng, Shu-Lin Liu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acquisition of exogenous genetic material is a key event in bacterial speciation. It seems reasonable to assume that recombination of the incoming DNA into genome would be more efficient with higher levels of relatedness between the DNA donor and recipient. If so, bacterial speciation would be a smooth process, leading to a continuous spectrum of genomic divergence of bacteria, which, however, is not the case as shown by recent findings. The goal of this study was todetermine if DNA transfer efficiency is correlated with the levels of sequence identity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24928416 PMCID: PMC4094785 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Bacterial strains used in this study*
| AE006468.1 | -- | [ | |
| CP001363.1 | Same serovar (1,4,[5],12:i:1,2) | | |
| AE014613.1 | Same subgroup (I) | [ | |
| CP000026.1 | Same subgroup (I) | | |
| CP000886.1 | Same serogroup (04) | | |
| CP000857.1 | Same subgroup (I) | | |
| CP001138.1 | Same serogroup (04) | | |
| N/A | Same serogroup (04) | | |
| CP001144.1 | Same subgroup (I) | | |
| N/A | Same subgroup (I) | | |
| AM933172.1 | Same subgroup (I) | | |
| N/A | Same subgroup (I) | | |
| CP003047.1 | Same subgroup (I) | [ | |
| AM933173.1 | Same subgroup (I) | [ | |
| CP000880.1 | Closely related subgroup (IIIa) | | |
| N/A | Closely related subgroup (IIIa) | | |
| FR877557.1 | Distantly related subgroup (V) | | |
| CP006692 | Distantly related subgroup (V) |
*See more detailed information on these bacterial strains at http://www.ucalgary.ca/~kesander.
Figure 1Phylogenetic trees of strains involved in transduction frequency comparison (see main text). A, Phylogenetic tree based on core genes of the whole genome; B, phylogenetic tree based on the five genes.
Sequence divergence of the five genes between LT2 and the recipient strains
| -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| 0 | 0.0006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0001 | 0.0003 | |
| 0.0094 | 0.0093 | 0.0136 | 0.0088 | 0.0103 | 0.0103 | 0.0019 | |
| 0.0105 | 0.0146 | 0.0163 | 0.0202 | 0.0085 | 0.014 | 0.0047 | |
| 0.0084 | 0.0088 | 0.0081 | 0.0088 | 0.0082 | 0.0085 | 0.0003 | |
| 0.0126 | 0.0088 | 0.0122 | 0.0202 | 0.0082 | 0.0124 | 0.0048 | |
| 0.0063 | 0.0128 | 0.0108 | 0.0202 | 0.0113 | 0.0123 | 0.0051 | |
| 0.0073 | 0.0123 | 0.0136 | 0.0053 | 0.0116 | 0.01 | 0.0035 | |
| 0.0073 | 0.0169 | 0.0136 | 0.0053 | 0.0111 | 0.0108 | 0.0047 | |
| 0.0692 | 0.0736 | 0.0637 | 0.0325 | 0.0598 | 0.0598 | 0.0161 | |
| 0.1143 | 0.0362 | 0.061 | 0.0554 | 0.0769 | 0.0688 | 0.0293 |
Relative transduction frequency of Salmonella strains for the five genes
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1.17 × 10-1 | 0.60 × 10-1 | 0.92 × 10-1 | 0.79 × 10-1 | 0.73 × 10-1 | (8.42 | |
| 0.42 × 10-2 | 0.24 × 10-2 | 1.03 × 10-2 | 1.36 × 10-2 | 1.68 × 10-3 | (9.46 | |
| 0.66 × 10-3 | 0.11 × 10-3 | 0.61 × 10-3 | 1.45 × 10-3 | 0.15 × 10-3 | (5.94 | |
| 4.30 × 10-3 | 1.92 × 10-3 | 3.64 × 10-3 | 3.50 × 10-3 | 3.29 × 10-3 | (3.33 | |
| 2.20 × 10-5 | 0.88 × 10-5 | 0.00 × 10-5 | 1.80 × 10-5 | 1.05 × 10-5 | (1.19 | |
| 0.93 × 10-3 | 0.76 × 10-3 | 1.22 × 10-3 | 0.13 × 10-3 | 0.48 × 10-3 | (7.02 | |
| 1.54 × 10-4 | 2.37 × 10-4 | 1.04 × 10-4 | 0.63 × 10-4 | 1.15 × 10-4 | (1.35 | |
| <1.00 × 10-6 | <1.00 × 10-6 | <1.00 × 10-6 | <1.00 × 10-6 | <1.00 × 10-5 | <1.00 × 10-6 | |
| 8.15 × 10-4 | 3.08 × 10-4 | 5.53 × 10-4 | 1.17 × 10-4 | 3.46 × 10-4 | (4.28 | |
| <1.00 × 10-6 | <1.00 × 10-6 | <1.00 × 10-6 | <1.00 × 10-6 | <1.00 × 10-6 | <1.00 × 10-6 |
Note: The relative transduction frequency listed in the table refers to relative transduction rate compared to LT2.
Figure 2Transduction frequencies against levels of relatedness among the strains.
Figure 3Comparisons of recombination efficiency reflected by transduction frequencies, with the points representing the numbers of transductants. A, Transduction of ompD159 between S. gallinarum and S. pullorum (see text for more details). Groups: 1, S. pullorum recipients and S. pullorum DNA; 2, S. pullorum recipients and S. gallinarum DNA; 3, S. gallinarum recipients and S. gallinarum DNA; 4, S. gallinarum recipients and S. pullorum DNA. Note that group 3 has the largest numbers of recipients (groups 2 vs 3, p = 0.007; groups 3 vs 4, p = 0.000), reflecting significantly higher recombination efficiency of S. gallinarum DNA into the S. gallinarum genome (group 3) than S. gallinarum DNA to the S. pullorum genome (group 2) or than S. pullorum DNA to the S. gallinarum genome (group 4). Group 1 had a similar tendency as group 3, although the differences were not statistically significant (groups 1 vs 2, p = 0.079; groups 1 vs 4, p = 0.071). B, Transduction with S. pullorumas the recipient and S. pullorum or S. gallinarumas the donor. Groups: 1, S. pullorum recipients with DNA fromS. gallinarum 287/91; 2, S. pullorum recipients with DNA from S. pullorum RKS5078 (groups 1 vs 2, p = 0.009). C, Transduction with S. pullorum or S. gallinarumstrains as the recipient and donor DNA from S. gallinarum. Groups: 1, S. pullorum recipients with DNA from S. gallinarum strain 287/91; 2, S. gallinarum recipients with DNA from S. gallinarum strain 287/91 (groups 1 vs 2, p = 0.000).
Frequencies of transformation among the recipient strains for the same donor DNA
| (4.30 | |
| (5.08 | |
| (4.10 | |
| (2.25 | |
| (2.46 | |
| (8.33 | |
| (1.44 | |
| (2.93 | |
| (8.15 | |
| (1.32 | |
| (1.58 |